Mini 1783: GTA 2 Mafia (GaME OVAH)
-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 55, Polar Vortex wrote:Guys, guys, guys, we have an announcment. We are an ascetic. Had to claim so people wouldn't lose time using powers on us in the night
Bearbert D-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 57, BlackStar wrote:In post 55, Polar Vortex wrote:Guys, guys, guys, we have an announcment. We are an ascetic. Had to claim so people wouldn't lose time using powers on us in the night
Did you tell us this because you thought that not hiding it would make you seem more like town?
Did you read the post? Because the answer is very explicitly in there.
-Snow-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
Why did you think this was scummy and what made you change your mind on Blackstar?
In post 53, Dragon Knight wrote:In post 47, The Banterlords wrote:UNVOTE: blackstar
VOTE: Dragonknight
ok I think you're town. But for future reference getting out of RVS is good because then discussion is generated. Like now I have a town read on you and a scum read on ds / fire.
Is it because hydra dissonance? Jeez, Dwlee, I knew you sucked at scum hunting but this is ridiculous.
-THEDiamond Sentinel
Do you think the Banterlords are town?-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 60, BlackStar wrote:In post 59, Polar Vortex wrote:In post 57, BlackStar wrote:In post 55, Polar Vortex wrote:Guys, guys, guys, we have an announcment. We are an ascetic. Had to claim so people wouldn't lose time using powers on us in the night
Did you tell us this because you thought that not hiding it would make you seem more like town?
Did you read the post? Because the answer is very explicitly in there.
-Snow
This is Mafia. Saying things doesn't necessarily make it true.
Makes sense.
-Snow (previous post is mine too)-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 63, A Real Scourge wrote:In post 62, Polar Vortex wrote:In post 60, BlackStar wrote:In post 59, Polar Vortex wrote:In post 57, BlackStar wrote:In post 55, Polar Vortex wrote:Guys, guys, guys, we have an announcment. We are an ascetic. Had to claim so people wouldn't lose time using powers on us in the night
Did you tell us this because you thought that not hiding it would make you seem more like town?
Did you read the post? Because the answer is very explicitly in there.
-Snow
This is Mafia. Saying things doesn't necessarily make it true.
Makes sense.
-Snow (previous post is mine too)
...really?
-Snow-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 90, FA_Q2 wrote:
It is extremely early to be calling for a policy lynch. Why have you done so? What is so bad that you want to PL on page 3 12 days from deadline?
While I don't agree there's enough reason for a policy lynch(and I'm not voting Dragonknight for a policy lynch), isn't it extremly obvious what BBT found worthy of it?-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 92, Polar Vortex wrote:In post 90, FA_Q2 wrote:
It is extremely early to be calling for a policy lynch. Why have you done so? What is so bad that you want to PL on page 3 12 days from deadline?
While I don't agree there's enough reason for a policy lynch(and I'm not voting Dragonknight for a policy lynch), isn't it extremly obvious what BBT found worthy of it?
Bearbert D-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 105, A Real Scourge wrote:In post 74, Polar Vortex wrote:VOTE: Dragonknight
They're going for hydra dissonance way too early and it looks fake as shit. I don't believe for a moment those last posts weren't completly discussed before making them.
^Bearbert D
consdering hydra dissonance is considered a scumtell.. why would they purposely try to fake it? (really badly)
To be extremly hard to read.
Bearbert D-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 138, Dragon Knight wrote:You guys threw out a terrible vote on BlackStar, simply because he doesn't like RVS. Then you guys voted us because you don't agree with what we say.
That's the single most terrible play I have ever seen.
Prove this. Where did people vote Blackstar for not liking RVS(actually the reverse is true, he commented onhow people wanted to get out of RVS too fast, doesn't look like something somebody who doesn't like RVS would say). And everybody voted you two not because they don't agree with you but because you are being hard to read intentionally(I did that) and because you straight up lied(like you did with this post)
Bearbert D-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 145, BlackStar wrote:There are 6 people voting him. At least 2 of them have to be scum
Have to? I'm pretty sure no statistics will tell you this. I'd expect one scum on the wagon personally.
Bearbert D-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 155, TheDominator37 wrote:In post 134, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:When you do scummy shit, you get lynched.
Dropping truth bombs up in here.
So we should lynch you?
VOTE: BBT
VOTE: banta
^good place to look for a DK partner if they flip scum
Bearbert D-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 158, TheDominator37 wrote:In post 156, Polar Vortex wrote:In post 155, TheDominator37 wrote:In post 134, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:When you do scummy shit, you get lynched.
Dropping truth bombs up in here.
So we should lynch you?
VOTE: BBT
VOTE: banta
^good place to look for a DK partner if they flip scum
Bearbert D
Pls explain
You changed the vote from the wagon for no apparent reason.-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 161, Polar Vortex wrote:In post 158, TheDominator37 wrote:In post 156, Polar Vortex wrote:In post 155, TheDominator37 wrote:In post 134, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:When you do scummy shit, you get lynched.
Dropping truth bombs up in here.
So we should lynch you?
VOTE: BBT
VOTE: banta
^good place to look for a DK partner if they flip scum
Bearbert D
Pls explain
You changed the vote from the wagon for no apparent reason.
Bearbert D-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 165, BlackStar wrote:In post 154, MagnaofIllusion wrote:In post 46, BlackStar wrote:I also don't like how you've been trying to rush us out of RVS. Especially on a flimsy reason like this.
In post 126, BlackStar wrote:Nah. It's not stalling progression.Because I unvoted, we moved out of RVS and people started asking serious questions.And it's not like I did it with the purpose of "stalling progression". Town and scum both do that, accidentally and on purpose, so it's weird how you were immediately like "yeah, we definitely need to lynch him". You have literally no reason to feel so strongly about lynching me. It feels forced
Hey Blackstar - if you could explain why you didn't like someone rushing us out of RVS while then explaining how your unvote did just that it would be great!
I didn't want us to rush out of RVS. But it happened anyway because you guys find everything scummy. It's pretty straight forward
Why do you think DK thought you hated RVS?
Also, for the others, how likely is it that Blackstar mentioned pregame in the scum forum he hates RVS and that's where DK go that idea. Because that's just wrong either way. The problem with this theory is that DK has made extremly many mistakes so far(outright lies actually). Also, DK, start answering questions. You've been asked multiple questions and ignored all of them. And after that you think we're horrible players for suspecting you. You're not going to AtE yourself out of this hole, you'll have to use good old logic. Even if you flip town, I won't shed a tear as nothing you've done makes me consider that you could be anything othrr than useless to town
Bearbert D-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
But this isn't even close to what I asked?
Bearbert D-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 178, Dragon Knight wrote:In post 177, MagnaofIllusion wrote:In post 172, Dragon Knight wrote:
Ah, I misread as why I hated RVS, not why I thought he did. My apologies.
Yup. Apologies for mis-reading. Doesn't bother to actually answer the asked question.
Scum. Hang it. Party.
ITS OBVIOUS THE QUESTION WASNT ADDRESSED TO ME, DUMBASS.
But I had previously asked that question to you?
Bearbert D-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 153, MagnaofIllusion wrote:I think the most damning part of Blackstar's unvote was the fact that Dom was self-voting on his own wagon. Clearly the person whose game was at risk didn't have any fear of that wagon going to lynch so it doesn't stand to reason Blackstar should have more concerns than Dom.
Right, the unvoting didn't make much sense. I think it's more likely to come from town though, scum had no motivation to unvote or get scared, unless they're partners, and even then it'd be a weird reaction.
We've only just started the game and you're already on full defense mode and excusing your play with meta. We don't care about your meta. Your whole play's been anti town. So if you are town, stop shitting on people and start actually trying to figure things out.
In post 184, Dragon Knight wrote:I am pretty sure we are still at L-1, so before someone does something stupid.
I guess we should claim.
We are a cop.
So yeah, you guys put a cop at L-1, congrats.
GOOD PLAYS!
-Fire
You put yourself at L-1.
-Snow-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 190, Dragon Knight wrote:In post 189, The Banterlords wrote:In post 188, Dragon Knight wrote:Do go on how you think we're "cop-like", sorta like how in Red Neighborhood, you thought he was "cop-like"...
i said you weren't cop-like here. I don't understand any of your posts cause they make 0 sense in response to other people's posts.
~Dwlee
Not*
My point is, stop relying on your own crappy intuition because it will lose town this game as well.
I guess this is a town read.
-Snow-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 192, Dragon Knight wrote:In post 191, Polar Vortex wrote:In post 190, Dragon Knight wrote:In post 189, The Banterlords wrote:In post 188, Dragon Knight wrote:Do go on how you think we're "cop-like", sorta like how in Red Neighborhood, you thought he was "cop-like"...
i said you weren't cop-like here. I don't understand any of your posts cause they make 0 sense in response to other people's posts.
~Dwlee
Not*
My point is, stop relying on your own crappy intuition because it will lose town this game as well.
I guess this is a town read.
-Snow
On Dwlee? No. This is a "I will only address the possibility that you are town because it's useless to address anything else"
And why is it useless to address the possibility of Banta being scum?
-Snow-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 239, Polar Vortex wrote:This game goes sooooo slow-.-. Has I Dannyboy posted? I don't remember absolutely anything...
VOTE: Jeanne
Bearbert-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 282, BlackStar wrote:@masquerade I don't have a read on him. That's why I voted him. To see if I could get a better read. That's not gonna happen now though.
UNVOTE:
What reaction would you have liked?-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 289, Polar Vortex wrote:In post 282, BlackStar wrote:@masquerade I don't have a read on him. That's why I voted him. To see if I could get a better read. That's not gonna happen now though.
UNVOTE:
What reaction would you have liked?
Bearbert-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 292, Code of Honor wrote:In post 291, BlackStar wrote:In post 289, Polar Vortex wrote:In post 282, BlackStar wrote:@masquerade I don't have a read on him. That's why I voted him. To see if I could get a better read. That's not gonna happen now though.
UNVOTE:
What reaction would you have liked?
Any reaction
Since I find it highly unlikely that they completely missed you voting for them, it was a conscious decision on their part to not respond to it. Therefore, their reaction to your vote was to not react to it.
Does that affect your read on them at all? If so, how?
-Xk
There's nothing you can react to a completly random vote? Like the only thing I thought was that the vote was stupid
Bearbert D-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 308, Dragon Knight wrote:In post 305, Jeanne11 wrote:I am a PR that is close to DK's claim. Oh, and for emphasis, I saidclose to itnotsame as it
Yep. That's scum alright. "It's enough to throw shade but enough that when they flip town I don't want to be held responsible"
Fry it.
Why would she even be responsible for your lynch? She's completely absent from the game.
I also don't understand this reaction to her pseudo-claim when I think it adds more credibility to your own.
So, seeing as you both have similar roles and you're fine with lynching her, why should we not lynch you instead? Because if it wasn't for your claim you'd still be at L-2/L-1 or already dead.
-Snow-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 294, MagnaofIllusion wrote:In post 288, BlackStar wrote:@magns I'm just going to completely disregard you now.
To anyone Town-reading Blackstar - can you elucidate why you are giving him a Town read?
Phantom Cobalt said it. Blackstar's posts seem genuine. I just don't see scum motivation in them or any hidden agenda. He reads like an individual with his own thoughts and his own way of playing. The unvote, the theory that there were 2 scum in DK's wagon and even his vote on us; those are things that tell me he's trying to figure things out and playing to a town wincon. I also like his tone. He's been under some pressure but he always keeps his calm, like he has nothing to be afraid of and nothing to hide.
In post 295, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Because I'm just not seeing it.
I mean he previously decried the Dragon Sentinel wagon has having 2 scum on it. He does nothing with that stance. He doesn't make any pro-active move to figure out who he thinks are the most likely scum on the wagon and pressure them.
Then he votes Polar Vortex. One of the votes on the DS wagon. His claimed reason - he didn't have a read on the slot. Shouldn't he already have suspicions about Polar if he truly believed the DS wagon was scum driven?
I just can't shake the feeling that Blackstar is scum who saw a flash wagon on Town and took the stance that it was scum driven for Town-cred from DS. He's already established he's too tentative and careful to make that play when a wagon flew on a partner so I'm dismissing DS + Blackstar Mafia at this point.
BTW - this theory means that Blackstar ever flips scum and I think DS is pretty clear.
I think you're reading too much into his posts when they're pretty simple. For example, you point out how he did nothing with the theory that there were two scum in DK's wagon (though I think voting us counts as something, since it shows he pursued the theory's direction), when the real worrisome thing would be if he had done something scummy with it, like pushing for a lynch on someone just because they voted DK. I don't think his lack of pro-action on a faulty assumption is something that should be held against him.
-Snow-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 310, Jeanne11 wrote:Very well, since all you do is throw shade on me yourself, I'll stop you by claiming fully. I am a town watcher.
Why did you claim now and when are you planning on actually playing?-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
-
-
Polar Vortex
-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
Why?
In post 340, The Banterlords wrote:
VOTE: Jeanne11
idk if we already have the vote on or not but she is sucm
~KT
Why?
-Snow-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 351, The Banterlords wrote:
Under no pressure for a claim.
Decides to put pressure on DK by claiming a "Similar" role but leaves enough room for when (this is where I'm assuming DK is town) dk flips cop that jeanne can say "oh well I said close to it not the same". There was 0 reason to softclaim at all as town right there. I believe the reason they claimed is as scourge pointed out in 307 we talked about lynching her for lurking and then she fully claims 3 posts later as watcher. (That's not even that similar to a cop)
Why is being under no pressure a scum sign? Where's the motivation in that, what does she win with this claim as scum? Nothing. She's cornering herself with this claim for no reason. I don't see a clear town motivation for the claim either, but it's much easier to believe and makes more sense with the rest of her play so far.
Notice how she didn't counter claim or even use her own role as a reason to push for DK's lynch. If she's not doing it with a DK lynch in mind why would she even need to leave room to defend herself upon a DK town flip. It just doesn't make any sense, we don't even know if DK is telling the truth. Besides, if she is telling the truth her ability could be as useful or even more so than DK's.
I can see her claiming as a defense, to stop further discussion of her lynch, which isn't really alignment telling but makes sense with her previous statement that she'd oppose her lynch vehemently. And as I said, it makes no sense for scum to commit themselves to a claim this early in a role madness game without being in real danger.-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 356, A Real Scourge wrote:polar vortex i don't get why you need much more of an explanation as to why jeanne is scummy? she's done no hunting, her claim was bad, she's been lurking, she only popped up after we started taking an interest in lynching her, blah blah blah.
your treatment of this wagon is really strange.
I'm not asking why people think she's scummy. I'm asking specifically asking Dom why he thinks she might be watcher and why banta are sure she is scum. Because I just don't see any evidence to back up those accusations and votes.
She's done no hunting, neither have more than half of the players in this game, players who didn't claim a PR. she's been lurking, so have more than half the players in this game, players who didn't claim a PR... Get it?
We've collectively decided to give a pass to a scummier player, one who's scummy because of things he has actually done and said, who claimed after being put at L-1, which gave him an actual motive to claim. A player who claimed cop with an implicit twist, which gives him room to wiggle tomorrow. But, ok, everyone is willing to take this risk, and so are we. Now why aren't you willing to take the same risk (I'd even say, a smaller risk) with a player whose biggest faults are basically not playing and only showing up to defend herself and claim unprompted?
How am I the only one who sees the issue here?
-Snow (previous one was mine too)-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 360, BlackStar wrote:Because as a member of the town, claiming for no reason on day 1 doesn't help anyone. It makes you an easy target for scum. If Jeanne really has a pr, the why would she put herself at risk so early on before she could even get a result? And it's suspicious that Jeanne only showed up after people started talking about lynching them.
The worst about claiming on day one is that the scum get free information. You're right that claiming makes her a target, she'd be a waste of a NK though, so the only option scum would have to get rid of her would be through lynching her.
I don't think she wanted to put herself at risk, not at lynch risk. I think if there's a reason for her to have claimed was to achieve the opposite; claim early, stop the discussion on her slot and prevent her wagon from taking off. It obviously didn't work out like that.
-Snow-
-
Polar Vortex
-
-
Polar Vortex
-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 367, The Banterlords wrote:In post 366, Polar Vortex wrote:
Ok Polar so you don't want a Jeanne lynch so what do YOU suggest we do today? I want your thought on who we should lynch.
~KTthecreeper
I'm still figuring. This game has stalled, it's always the same people posting. Right now I'm mostly waiting for the rest of the players to show up and post anything so I can get a read on them. Like,
Vote: Dominator.-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 416, Polar Vortex wrote:I really think we should look at Dom hard. He's done absolutely nothing towny. Neither has Jeanne, but at least she's replaced and maybe the replacement will be better. Also, DK could be helpful with the role
Bearbert-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 488, Dragon Knight wrote:Let's go with we lynch Ranger, and then on the off-chance she flips town, then we take her read lists and use them.
-Bringer of the Fire
Genius.
We were not lynching Jeanne and we're most definitely not lynching Ranger.
-Snow.-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
I'm 100% with my other head here. Ranger seems like a competent player. This town lacks those. We're certainly not going to vote one on D1.
Ranger, talk to me about A Real Scrouge. I'm getting very bad feelings on her. For the same reasons as you appear to do, the fact that she looks distanced from the game. Also, after our claim she threw dirt at us for the claim. Somebody said that was suspicious, she never went deeper with that accusation and then had us as town in a later post. The progression just seems too convenient. All her stances are very convenient and middle of the road. I'd still prefer Dom(as a policy if you want, but more for the fact that I don't want to lynch competent players like Scrouge before useless ones)
Bearbert D-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 482, TheDominator37 wrote:In post 479, Masquerade wrote:I don't know anymore. I'm not used to Ranger giving that huge elaborations on reads unprompted.. I also have an issue with her comparing magna to another player, I want to see magna's response. Other than that, her readslists seem good enough to me, I don't agree with everything but I'm also not under the impression my reads are 100% correct at this point.
I want BBT to come in and read and share thoughts, most of all I want him to throw some questions my way. My reads on clumsy and Faq have changed to null in the last couple of pages and currently I don't know where I stand on anyone else. I'll do some rereads later.
I I kind of thought the same thing. She is trying too hard to be town.
You can't try to be town. You either are or you don't. If you mean trying to look town, yeah, that's what town is supposed to do. And you aren't doing that-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 492, Polar Vortex wrote:In post 482, TheDominator37 wrote:In post 479, Masquerade wrote:I don't know anymore. I'm not used to Ranger giving that huge elaborations on reads unprompted.. I also have an issue with her comparing magna to another player, I want to see magna's response. Other than that, her readslists seem good enough to me, I don't agree with everything but I'm also not under the impression my reads are 100% correct at this point.
I want BBT to come in and read and share thoughts, most of all I want him to throw some questions my way. My reads on clumsy and Faq have changed to null in the last couple of pages and currently I don't know where I stand on anyone else. I'll do some rereads later.
I I kind of thought the same thing. She is trying too hard to be town.
You can't try to be town. You either are or you don't. If you mean trying to look town, yeah, that's what town is supposed to do. And you aren't doing that
Bear-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 494, Dragon Knight wrote:In post 491, Polar Vortex wrote:I'm 100% with my other head here. Ranger seems like a competent player. This town lacks those. We're certainly not going to vote one on D1.
Ranger, talk to me about A Real Scrouge. I'm getting very bad feelings on her. For the same reasons as you appear to do, the fact that she looks distanced from the game. Also, after our claim she threw dirt at us for the claim. Somebody said that was suspicious, she never went deeper with that accusation and then had us as town in a later post. The progression just seems too convenient. All her stances are very convenient and middle of the road. I'd still prefer Dom(as a policy if you want, but more for the fact that I don't want to lynch competent players like Scrouge before useless ones)
Bearbert D
This is AWFUL logic. It doesn't matter how good a player is, if they are scum, NEVER keep them around. Ranger is scum. End of story.
Obviously if you proved she's scum, I'd vote for her. But you haven't even gave us a reason for that read. So no, I'm not going to trust you on this one. Especially not with how horrible your play has been
Bearbert-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 506, Dragon Knight wrote:In post 504, Code of Honor wrote:In post 494, Dragon Knight wrote:In post 491, Polar Vortex wrote:I'm 100% with my other head here. Ranger seems like a competent player. This town lacks those. We're certainly not going to vote one on D1.
Ranger, talk to me about A Real Scrouge. I'm getting very bad feelings on her. For the same reasons as you appear to do, the fact that she looks distanced from the game. Also, after our claim she threw dirt at us for the claim. Somebody said that was suspicious, she never went deeper with that accusation and then had us as town in a later post. The progression just seems too convenient. All her stances are very convenient and middle of the road. I'd still prefer Dom(as a policy if you want, but more for the fact that I don't want to lynch competent players like Scrouge before useless ones)
Bearbert D
This is AWFUL logic. It doesn't matter how good a player is, if they are scum, NEVER keep them around. Ranger is scum. End of story.
Sorry. I just don't see it. You are going to have to give me something better than a bunch of meta to convince me that the jeanne/Ranger slot is scum.
BOTH OF THEM HAVE DONE FUCK-ALL, WHICH IS A SCUM TELL FOR BOTH. I CAN LITERALLY SAY NOTHING ELSE THAN THEY ARE FUCKING SCUM. IF YOU DONT WANT ME TO WASTE AN INVESTIGATION ON THEM, THEN LYNCH THEM. OTHERWISE I WILL BE FORCED TO WASTE AN INVESTIGATION ON SOMEONE WHO IS 100% CONFIRMED SCUM.
Ranger has replaced in for less that 48 hours. Since she's replaced in, she's done a lot more than you have in the whole game.-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 507, Polar Vortex wrote:In post 506, Dragon Knight wrote:In post 504, Code of Honor wrote:In post 494, Dragon Knight wrote:In post 491, Polar Vortex wrote:I'm 100% with my other head here. Ranger seems like a competent player. This town lacks those. We're certainly not going to vote one on D1.
Ranger, talk to me about A Real Scrouge. I'm getting very bad feelings on her. For the same reasons as you appear to do, the fact that she looks distanced from the game. Also, after our claim she threw dirt at us for the claim. Somebody said that was suspicious, she never went deeper with that accusation and then had us as town in a later post. The progression just seems too convenient. All her stances are very convenient and middle of the road. I'd still prefer Dom(as a policy if you want, but more for the fact that I don't want to lynch competent players like Scrouge before useless ones)
Bearbert D
This is AWFUL logic. It doesn't matter how good a player is, if they are scum, NEVER keep them around. Ranger is scum. End of story.
Sorry. I just don't see it. You are going to have to give me something better than a bunch of meta to convince me that the jeanne/Ranger slot is scum.
BOTH OF THEM HAVE DONE FUCK-ALL, WHICH IS A SCUM TELL FOR BOTH. I CAN LITERALLY SAY NOTHING ELSE THAN THEY ARE FUCKING SCUM. IF YOU DONT WANT ME TO WASTE AN INVESTIGATION ON THEM, THEN LYNCH THEM. OTHERWISE I WILL BE FORCED TO WASTE AN INVESTIGATION ON SOMEONE WHO IS 100% CONFIRMED SCUM.
Ranger has replaced in for less that 48 hours. Since she's replaced in, she's done a lot more than you have in the whole game.
Bear-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 514, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
So you have suspicions they are not Town and you want to relieve them of justifying their Night choices?
Yeah? I'd rather get a good investigation than an idiotic one that he'd have to explain. Also, I don't really suspect them that much lately, I'm just pissed at them
Bear
Now I saw your last point. Well, if I saw Jeanne NK-ed the first might I'd be extremly happy. Wouldn't you?-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 512, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
In post 361, Polar Vortex wrote:You're right that claiming makes her a target, she'd be a waste of a NK though, so the only option scum would have to get rid of her would be through lynching her
Why would an information role, no matter how weak the player who has the role, be a waste of a Nightkill for scum? I’d love for you to elaborate on that premise if you could.
It's not a complete waste, but killing a useless and suspected town slot whose only threat comes with her role and its possible results, which may vary in usefulness to town, is a waste when they could be killing an actual threat. But, why waste a kill on her when they can just lynch her...
In post 512, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Especially given how strongly Dragon is pushing given what he stands to lose Town Cred wise if Ranger flips Town and how Ranger is going out of his way to appease the other investigation role.
You can't lose something you don't have.
-Snow-
-
Polar Vortex Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 519
- Joined: August 6, 2015
In post 522, Dragon Knight wrote:In post 509, Polar Vortex wrote:And no, you don't fucking get a choice in who you investigate. I propose we also take a vote on that one.
Bearbert
I will garruntee that if you try to tell us who to investigate, we will do the exact opposite of what you say.
Antitown to the core like expected. And please stop with the meta nonsense. Nobody wants to hear that.
Incidentally, I'm becoming more and more interested in lynching BBT. He's not shown us anything. Why is he town in your reads Ranger? I don't think you've given a reason for that and I don't see any possible one. So please, do elaborate on this.
Range is my new mafia best friend. I love her posts. Really happy she turned that slot into something useful. Her posts make sense, her suspects are solid and her tone is really genuine. Also, I was baffled by the "investigate me post" by her, but thinking more about it I quite like it(before you ask DK, I know she wasn't serious). The main point would be that scum her really wouldn't want to draw attention on the possibility of DK investigating her. Usually scum would have shut up about this. So she'd be my strongest town read so far.<---- I know the whole reasoning about Ranger isn't very clear so feel free to ask about it
Ranger, do you like playing scum and if yes, would you consider yourself prone to taking risks?
Bear
-
-
-