Darox used a logical proof. It can't be denied.
LOGIC FOR THE LOGIC GOD
In post 60, vijay2vasandani wrote:Drawing attention to rule 4 just throws it away.
Elmo, why trust both implosion and BB? Personally I'm reading them as opposite alignments atm.
In post 70, vijay2vasandani wrote:In post 68, BBmolla wrote:In post 60, vijay2vasandani wrote:Elmo, why trust both implosion and BB? Personally I'm reading them as opposite alignments atm.
Explain.
I don't think you guys have different alignments. It's a feel thing.
@ Elmo: what are you on about? That's one rule you shouldn't have drawn attention to.
Yes I read Vijay's iso. HE NEVER ACTUALLY CALLED IMPLOSION SCUM. He called them different alignments yes (and then switched his mind) Notice how he has yet to give even an inkling of reasoning for saying ANY of this.
Spyrex, I asked for reasons why implosion was scum because my vote was an rvs vote and I didn't have a scumread on anyone. Or else I would have changed my vote.
I'm still not seeing how not having any scumreads on page fucking 4 is scummy.
I will probably have read everything in this thread 5-6 times before I'm ready to pick somebody to lynch.
Oh come on.
I have towned ridiculously hard at this point and you know it.