In post 279, Garmr wrote:Grayfoxx axle said he was scum
Wow. Ok I'm going to catch up and post in next 12 hours (I hope)
In post 279, Garmr wrote:Grayfoxx axle said he was scum
In post 524, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Guys I've had a lot going on last few days, quitting/getting new job. I will post my case on Garm tonight.
In post 537, GrayFoxxxx wrote:@Sland,Scorp
Didn't know I would be losing my job when I replaced. Sorry to disappoint you.
Your 4 reasons for voting me are redundant as well. They are all just worded differently. Well 3 has nothing to do with me.
But to address your point(s)-
My posting has slowed down ALOT in the last few days. Be careful talking about ongoing games. I'm not going to touch on that anymore.
More tonight.
In post 683, DeasVail wrote:
In post 680, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Ok guys my personal shit is cleared up for the next few days.
Anything I need to comment on in particular?
Why are you asking us what we want you to comment on rather than looking yourself? If you are town then it shouldn't be what we want that matters.
In post 689, Doctor Vahlen wrote:GrayFoxx I want your thoughts on DV, Firebringer and Fraggernaut.
In post 715, Garmr wrote:VOTE: grayfox
Like seriously it been two day phases and you can't even answer with all that time.
In post 723, Garmr wrote:In post 718, DeasVail wrote:I actually like how GrayFox didn't cave and try to produce his own content after I attacked him for it.
710 says other wise
In post 728, Garmr wrote:Easy deas point was you don't cave in to pressure you caved in there are you still going to pick and choose what you answerIn post 725, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 723, Garmr wrote:In post 718, DeasVail wrote:I actually like how GrayFox didn't cave and try to produce his own content after I attacked him for it.
710 says other wise
Care to explain?
In post 733, Garmr wrote:maybe read the gameIn post 729, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 728, Garmr wrote:Easy deas point was you don't cave in to pressure you caved in there are you still going to pick and choose what you answerIn post 725, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 723, Garmr wrote:In post 718, DeasVail wrote:I actually like how GrayFox didn't cave and try to produce his own content after I attacked him for it.
710 says other wise
Care to explain?
Caved in? By answering a straight forward question?
I was asked specifically about those 3 players.
What was I initially resisting, before I "caved in"?
In post 752, Slandaar wrote:Why?
I find your answer very useless. You know I am going to follow up wanting a reason - You say you wish to cooperate yet this kind of answer is clearly not cooperating fully.
In post 754, Slandaar wrote:Yeah, except I don't see anyone 'buying into it' so you are just writing words with no factual basis.
I asked by 'biggest scum read from D1 to vote you' because I want to see how Gray reacts and now explains his choice. This is called...scumhunting.
In post 758, Slandaar wrote:I really don't like it when players say 'right now' with reads.
What exactly do you disagree with about my perspective?
In post 760, Slandaar wrote:I also find it incredibly untownlike to say you interpret something as X, X being scummy, yet arenot willing to debate it to discover if you are right or wrong or to just get a better understanding of the situation.
Very untownlike indeed.
In post 761, Slandaar wrote:In post 759, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 758, Slandaar wrote:I really don't like it when players say 'right now' with reads.
What exactly do you disagree with about my perspective?
I don't think the reasons you put on your vote post are good enough for ME to vote him.
OK. I guess the next question is; why? you don't find my reasons to indicate scum? what exactly is it you disagree with?
In post 766, Slandaar wrote:In post 763, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 760, Slandaar wrote:I also find it incredibly untownlike to say you interpret something as X, X being scummy, yet arenot willing to debate it to discover if you are right or wrong or to just get a better understanding of the situation.
Very untownlike indeed.
You and Fro99er seem to love to rush people.
It's been 7 minutes since you initially asked me why. Now I'm unwilling to debate? Haha
This is not related. You didn't click to what I was referring to.
In post 765, Slandaar wrote:There is a real reason. Do you think it is more or less likely than rand a player is scum who:
1. Has to ISO the leading wagon 2 days before a deadline to post their opinion on said player.
2. Has to ISO a player who has been a big part of the discussion during the day to have an opinion on them.
Do you think it is more or less likely than rand a player is scum who:
Asks a question which is clearly not thought out well and has no real scumhunting purpose.
I think it is very clear personally that both indicate scum.
You say neither is even a real reason. I expect you can explain why this is.
In post 770, Slandaar wrote:So, chop chop, back to you posting actual reasoning for your stance on Scorpious.
In post 769, Slandaar wrote:I lied I am back quicker than I said!
I just told you that you clearly don't understand what I was referring to with that quote.
In post 724, GrayFoxxxx wrote:but just know I'm not going to debate these posts. It's just my interpretation of what happened.
These are your words are they not?
You don't think it would be beneficial to actually figure out if your interpretation is correct or not by... debating?
In post 774, Slandaar wrote:In post 771, GrayFoxxxx wrote:1.He wants to double check. Not scummy at all to me. Are ISO's only available to scum?
2.read above
When you say double check what you mean is 'he didn't have an opinion so went and ISO'ed responding to each post so that he had one' then responded. It's especially bad as it was the leading wagon at deadline whom any townie should have had a decent opinion on and not needed to ISO to post a response.
In post 443, Scorpious wrote:fair.. Let me do an ISO. I dont think there is much..
That does not read like 'Let me double check'.
What is your opinion on X Gray?
'Let me do an ISO'
Does that sound like you are double checking or that you don't really have one?
It seems very clear to me that all these factors mean that anyone doing this has a higher chance than random to flip scum. You apparently think otherwise.
In post 771, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Your third question seems loaded asf, and by answering it I am indirectly accusing scorp of doing two things that I don't think he did/is doing.
You found his question useful?
In post 776, Doctor Vahlen wrote:Slandaar, GrayFoxx and Scorpious are town. The cases on them happened right after Fluggernaut and Firebringer were getting consensus scumreads.
In post 783, Doctor Vahlen wrote:In post 777, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 776, Doctor Vahlen wrote:Slandaar, GrayFoxx and Scorpious are town. The cases on them happened right after Fluggernaut and Firebringer were getting consensus scumreads.
Meh I don't get the connection.
At the time of the "case" against Scorpious by DeasVail, Fluggernaut was flailing continuing to try and play semantics (and wow he's lurking now). Firebringer was catching heat for his terrible vote on me ("waiting for confirmation" and then suddenly voting me).
Slandaar was going to town on them.You were suspicious of them.
DeasVail comes in and attacks Scorpious for no reason. They start to lurk.
They are trying to lurk out the wagons on them.
In post 798, Slandaar wrote:In post 775, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Ok we don't agree on what he meant.
Maybe the question was useful to him. Maybe not.
Double Checking before posting your opinion is actually scummy in itself as it is a cautious/careful thing. You disagree?
Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't, doyouthink it was useful?
In post 801, Slandaar wrote:In post 799, GrayFoxxxx wrote:
Yes I disagree.
No not useful to me, but I don't expect everything everyone does to relate to me.
Of course you disagree. What exactly do you think makes someone scum?
Do you think it was useful to him?
In post 805, Slandaar wrote:
Nope.
In life everyone has bad ideas from time to time it does not mean they had an ulterior motive for it. Some peoples logic is better than others it doesn't mean the ones with worse logic are planning a killing spree.
That actually sounds very good! Can you please show me some of these contextual interactions which reveal scum to the town please?
In post 804, GrayFoxxxx wrote:
All of this can be observed. No "gut feelings", or "meta", or, "I dont like his attitude",that can be used instead of actual evidence.
Do I think it was useful to him? Maybe. Maybe not.
Maybe, Maybe not again eh? Maybe you should think about it and have an actual opinion.
Was there a reason other than to get a lynch through?
What kind of answer will help Scorpious read the player? Obviously as town that was the motivation and as scum you won't get another answer as it's a fine reason... seems like a pointless question eh?
In post 881, Slandaar wrote:I see you still have done a total of 0 scumhunting Gray. Good to know you are still around though.
In post 906, Fraggernaut wrote:
As for Gray. Why is it strange? In a world where Doctor/Victor or yourself are scum, you could NK Gray in the night & claim the town credit & ride it to the end. You could WIFOM it that you were simply fishing for a interaction, when Gray flips town (If that's the case) & nullify your scum read on him.
In post 911, spicer1209 wrote:Hello people. Ill start reading here pretty quick but does any one have a good place to start so I dont have to go through pages of useless bullshit?
In post 914, spicer1209 wrote:In post 913, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 911, spicer1209 wrote:Hello people. Ill start reading here pretty quick but does any one have a good place to start so I dont have to go through pages of useless bullshit?
Well scorp is a kind of a big deal right now
oh shit you are here....well I guess Ill start tunneling you then
In post 951, Slandaar wrote:
What towncred is there when I ask Gray to vote Scorpious? he votes Scorpious, Scorpious is lynched and? I get towncred?
In post 995, havingfitz wrote:^ what do you need to hear beyond what was in his claim post?
In post 1010, Scorpious wrote:Oh well it was fun.. Wincon baby!! Goodnight Slandaar ..
In post 1022, Slandaar wrote:In post 805, Slandaar wrote:
That actually sounds very good! Can you please show me some of these contextual interactions which reveal scum to the town please?
Also people who say really clever sounding things but don't provide flip scum a lot.
Gray has not provided.
In post 1155, ShadedMelee wrote:@grayfoxx what is your stance for a fitz lynch?
In post 1177, havingfitz wrote:
Grayfoxxxx...go ahead and hammer. You can't look any worse that you already do.
ffs