Sorry, we've been having some...relational issues...and haven't really been focusing on mafia lately -_-
All good now though =D
Claiming SK is not a towntell. Ever.Thor665 wrote:@sims - that play seems too obvious and risky to work. By claiming SK (a claim he has since said isn't true, fyi everyone) Gud basically put a 'kill me before mylo/lylo card on his chest and lit it up with sparklers. No scum is likely to try that on Day 1 methinks. I actually am taking it as a towntell simply because it's such an in your face reaction test that he basically screamed that he should have everyone pay attention to him - which is not something scum normally do. They either try to stay under radars or they try to look town - I've yet to see one try to look scummy/anti-town.
I actually agree that Carrot looks bad, but I think she does so independent of Gud's actions.
Yet you don't explain how any of the post is a misrep.Guderian wrote:Blatant misrepresentation on almost every post. If I am alive tomorrow, you're next.
Bussing you (sim) and going "hey, we should compromise" (carrotcake)Considering Gud-scum,
Where are the scumbuddies?
Where is the counterwagon?
People are at L-1 all the time, only VIs would hammer someone at L-1 without a claim. The fact you're scared of being hammered post claim is laughable at best if you're town.Guderian wrote:Hold on. Don't get anxious at L-1? I just let and be hammered?
Dont have a grasp on the games?
Guderian wrote:The last 50 3:9 games are 37 mafia, 13 town
Don't use stats if you're going to use all of them3:9 Closed Mini Normals (171 games) (46.6%)
Mafia wins: 107 (62.6%)
Town Wins: 62 (36.3%)
Draw: 2 (1.1%)
You know, there's a very good possibility the "newer" players on your list are better than you are (or ever will be, with your current mentality) and are voting you for much more than your little claimTyping wall of text post is anti-town and why the town loses so much. I have 3 newer players on my lynch because they thought I was a legit SK, 2 scum, and seraphim.
And now you're just refusing to defend yourself, which isGuderian wrote:Alert: this is the last post I will post any sort of defense about.
...Powerrox93 wrote:You're all about to see something I've never done before, making a (sort-of) PBPA on the NK'd player (Rhinox in this case). I know I'm not the best person at doing this.
Some post are left out because I don't feel like they need to be commented
_________________
2: Analyzing a situation in a townie way and puts pressure on Gud.
3: Response to Gud's response to the pressure.
4 + 5: Responding to Sims overreaction after Sims being criticized for making random votes when we were no longer in the RVS
7 + 9: Again analyzing a situation, this time on AGar's case on BQ, still townie but with more pressure. Really good arguments here but...
...I'm still waiting for BQ before deciding what to do from here.
Translation: I'm scum who played like shit D1, so I need time to let the rest of you come up with another case for me to parrot and wagon.AGar wrote:My top suspects are undecided at this point, for those wondering. I need to re-read this, as I feel I was potentially barking way up the wrong tree yesterday.
We lol'd.Lateralus wrote:I literally can not understand what you're saying here. Please clarify.
nice refutal of our case broAGar wrote:Lat - Offering to cut a deal with the SK does not constitute pro-town action. By ignoring the wagon, I more mean "tried to avert it in any way possible," than actually not responding to it. If you think any player will completely ignore a player... then that's just bad play.
Anyways. Trying to desperately avert a wagon who claims an anti-town role isn't a pro-town action, like you're cracking it up to be.
I fail to see any outlying cause to believe SS is scum. Saying "She hasn't presented herself in a readable manner." doesn't constitute a case, especially coming from a player like Recka. Just because you can't read a player doesn't mean that they aren't making themselves readable. Just means you aren't trying.
Lat's attacks on both myself and SS are really,reallyweak. His attack on SS is baseless, while his attack on me consists of "I don't want to die, so I'm going to pick at something awful in the hopes that it sticks."
I'm very comfortable with my vote where it's sitting.
You forgot us.Thor665 wrote:I'm back. Quick catchup;
iamauser looks pretty town to me.
I'm not sure about the Seraphim case, that still looks like a town slot as well.
I think singer is town - it's not a super strong read, but I've seen her as town and scum and she really does play this way as both, so much of the scumspicion on her just looks weak at the moment.
Nacho feels like town Nacho...please be town Nacho.
I'm still pretty happy with the AGar wagon, sorry buddy, you gots to die.
Power or Lat are probably my current seconds.
If there are counterclaims of any sort, one extra night can help us figure out who's lying and who isn't, rather than locking into a 1v1 today and giving us a 50% chance of lynching wrongly and losing the game.Thor665 wrote:Neutral - I usually trust PRs to puzzle out their own reveals.
Advantage you foresee?
This claim smells funny.Seraphim wrote:Aha, this is open. Anyway, I'm fairly sure I have a guilty result today that should make things considerably easier.
I'm a watcher, first of all.
I targeted Thor N1. He was my strongest town read and I felt, out of all the players, he was the towniest. No one visited him.
I targeted Nachomamma N2. Same deal with N1. No one visited him.
I targeted Mothrax N3. I targeted him because of a vibe I got...I dunno Guess what? I got a result. Mothrax was visited last night. Mothrax died last night. Let's do the math. The visitor was the one and only singersigner.
Unless there are some shenanigans in the works, I think the lynch is clear.
I want SS to claim next.