Anyways I have played with none of you and as such will be saying.
Just coz I don't like that added x's. =P
Isn't it a bit early. Well I wouldn't policy lynch someone because I have no idea how anyone plays seeing as this is my first non-newbie game. I suppose if I had to give an answer I would say lurkers especially since this isn't a game with frightened newbies too scared to post.AlmasterGM wrote:@Everyone - If you HAD to policy lynch one player in this game, who would it be and why?
It'd be cool if the answers weren't random.
The point of RVS is to gain info on everyone by judging the interplay and natural conversation that voting causes. By choosing not to participate in RVS you are in essance witholding information from town which is definantly not a pro-town thing to do.Sakako wrote:Wow, random voting much? I think I'll pass for now.
Also, I'm running Ubuntu with XMonad. It's the bomb.
I'm in a similar boat. My last game I wasn't aggressive enough early and town kinda lost as a result of it.Sakako wrote:Wow. I can't win. In the last two games I played, I screwed up the RVS cause I kept it going. Now I don't want to vote, and I'm getting voted for?
Vote: Espeonage, cause you're actually analysing stuff. :p
I would classify Active Lurking to include those people that post but don't contribute to discussion but still make valid votes whereas a floater would be more likely to mimic someone elses arguement.Nikanor wrote:I want to hear more from Netopalis. Where art thou, O brother?
How are they any different?Sakako wrote:I think floating is probably more of a scumtell than general active lurking - but that might just be me.
@Vi: Hiiiiii~ to you too.
LMAO, anyways. I happen to see RVS lynches all the time. Never on this site though so I doubt it would happen somewhere as serious as this.Sakako wrote:AB: I actually hammered someone just after RVS was finished, if that counts. I got lynched for it the next day, though. ^^;
It wasn't my fault, I swear.
And what the hell was that?MonkeyMan576 wrote: This was absolutely a terrible defence post and I recommend more votes on you with quick haste.
You even state in that post that you had suspicion cast on you, therefore failing to provide what was asked for.kyle99 wrote:Sorry, wrong link. Disregard last post.
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 82#2109882