ee thread finally opened... really excited to be finally playing~~~
because he's definitely mafia. It says so in his name!! >_<
On the contrary, wagoning in the RVS is GREAT~~~!! It gets the ball rolling much faster! ^___^DeathNote wrote:It was merely a demonstration that bandwagoning should not be done. I suppose I should have FOS you instead but voting just seems to have so much more of an impact.
Did you or did you not find OMGLyncher's FoS's suspicious? o_O Why would it be less scummy if there are "two people to choose from"...? @_@;; I'm a little confused by your reasoning..... >_<Mafia_failure wrote:I also find people who FoS suspicious unless they have two people to choose which in this case is what OMGLyncher did.
How would voting for either party (by that I assume you meant DeathNote and me, right?) worsen the situation for town??OMGLyncher wrote:The reason I chose to FoS rather than vote was because my suspicion was due to the early accusations of bandwagoning: voting for either party worsens the situation for the town...
Do you think it's a good idea for you to stay out of arguments? ._.OMGLyncher wrote: ...and just drags me into the argument.
What is your impression of your son's taste in games??? xDhavingfitz wrote:This is my 2nd game ever. Talked into trying Mafia by my son (who is somewhat obssessed by it).
Tororingu-chan wrote:@Mafia_failure:Did you or did you not find OMGLyncher's FoS's suspicious? o_O Why would it be less scummy if there are "two people to choose from"...? @_@;; I'm a little confused by your reasoning..... >_<Mafia_failure wrote:I also find people who FoS suspicious unless they have two people to choose which in this case is what OMGLyncher did.
Your Pablo vote is a random OMGUS vote, which means that you really aren't suspicious of him at all..... Then you FoS DeathNote, which means that you are suspicious of him~~~ >_<;; Why didn't you just vote DeathNote if you were suspicious of him?? @_@OMGLyncher wrote:OMGUS VOTE: Pablofor misinterpreting my name: Lynching is townie! Even worse you linked me to your fail!
FoS Deathnotefor not having the conviction to stay with his random vote: Could be that he's mafia trying to appear neutral
ehehehe, people sure do like waving little "hi, I'm townie!" flags around here~ ^_^;; I never thought it was beneficial for any player, scum or town, to claim a town-alignment... v_v;; You prove your townie-ness by your play, not by saying that you are one~~Pablo Molinero wrote:Otherwise, I'm just here to win the gamefor the townlike (most of) the rest of you.
But that is wrong... we were both at L-3 at the time you FoS'ed us. >_<;OMGLyncher wrote: I didn't want to vote because It looked like you and deathnote were both on L-2 at some point and if I'd voted...
Oh?? I thought you were only being inactive... so you were lurking....??? @_@; That's not a good sign!!OMGLyncher wrote:Why did I stay in the background after that?
OMGLyncher wrote: Keep the noose around my neck for now: I need to earn my way out of this suspicion.
PaltryExcuse wrote: Everyone has different things that they consider scummy, but sorry, I have no intention of sharing mine~ >_<;
Well... OMGLyncher did admit to trying to stay out of the limelight.....PaltryExcuse wrote:Who do you believe is trying to stay out of the limelight, and who do you believe is just quiet?
ehehe that's flattering xD;; But please don't be mistaken~ I'm only bumbling my way through this game like the rest of you~ronnieroo wrote:T-Chan: Could be a powerful player, reasons stated in another post.
In other words~~ my concerns are legitimate, and you seem to realise this! ^_^OMGLyncher wrote:Woah that is a scary number of questions (I guess I deserve them).
...
Keep the noose around my neck for now: I need to earn my way out of this suspicion.
But one post later, my accusations are baseless. Which is it??? @_@;;OMGLyncher wrote:If I had posted with what I first thought, thereby passing your criteria for activity, I would have posted stupidly and replaced your baseless accusations with legitimate concern.
The game will go nowhere if people just sit here going "hmm, I don't know." >_< The vote is the townie's most powerful weapon, so you should use it~!!ronnieroo wrote: I don't understand what you're saying. Are you encouraging people to vote for anyone that even midly draws their attention? If not, what exactly do you mean by pile the votes on?
We inferred that from your eagerness to lynch him before his replacement even showed up... @_@; It just seems really hasty to me!!havingfitz wrote:MM...nowhere do I make any reference to OMG being guaranteed scum.
I noticed it, and it was odd, but at this point in time I don't consider him scummier than OMGLyncher~~ ^_^ So far, I'm willing to accept his explanation that he's just really impatient, since I can see how it's possible to be exasperated at the rate this game is (was) moving.. @_@;;MiteyMouse wrote:See what I find funny about HF thinking that Ray/OMG is guaranteed Scum is that it smels of PIS (perfect infrmation syndrome). What I find funnier is that you point this out and then defend him T-Chan.
Huh~? IMiteyMouse wrote:So T-Chan, do you see how it could look like you are defending H-Fitz?
I hate the newbie card as much as you do, but keep in mind that this is a newbie game~ =_=;; If we didn't allow it, we'd be lynching newbies all the time.. @_@;Rayfrost wrote:I do not approve of the use of the newbie card as a defense of any scummy behavior. I personally believe it shouldn't be used at all, but, if you intend to use it, have some criteria so it can't just be used generally or selectively. Keep a single standard for it or don't use it at all.
Rayfrost wrote:I'm a pro-town role. Saying the actual role would give scum fewer people to try and find the potential PRs in, so that's all you get from meAhh, why so coy? ^u^;
******
I love how I am high on the scum list for random inexplicable reasons!! ^____^
ehehe no~ ^_^ I was referring to the thread as a whole.... it seems people suspect me, but they aren't sure why they do. o_O;;RayFrost wrote:1. You are hardly "high" on it. You are barely scummy at all >.> Did you read my explanation of the positions?
It's hard to have a single standard... everyone interprets plays differently... @_@;; But let's try not to make newbie mistakes at all!! d(^_^)bRayFrost wrote:Eh, that's why I said "keep a single standard for it or don't use it at all" as my opinion on it. Either you use it equally across the board or not at all.
Mood swings? I guess I couldn't really expect any better than that... @_@;RayFrost wrote:Imo, his play would be classified as dumb play, but not necessarily scummy play. Some individuals are tentative by nature, so they are unlikely to push their ideas when there is anything even somewhat aggressive toward them. Then some experience mood swings that lead them to be aggressive toward their attackers and then they slip away again after the heat of the moment in a mix of embarrassment and self-doubt, etc, etc.
Just checking on something...... you are suspicious of RonnieRoo because she defended OMGLyncher (you), who is town?? o_O;;RayFrost wrote:magical kangaRoo - buddying up to OMGl, very poor defense constituting "he's a newbie!" I don't approve of the defense, and it seems like an attempt to seem pro-town when OMGl flips town and, thus, avoid suspicion. This is supported by the fact the kangaRoo has not made even a moderately decent defense of him, and the defense made is half assed.
Yes, I was probably tunnel-visioning a little... @_@; I thought he was miles scummier than anyone else, so I tried to get him lynched..PaltryExcuse wrote:ABR claimed you were tunnel-visioned towards OMG, I never saw a response to that claim. What do you think of that assessment?
Hmm, okay, so he finds OMGLyncher suspicious.... the post is nothing more than a regurgitation of previous arguments, but never mind! ^_^DeathNote wrote:@OMGLyncher- Lets see...
Contradiction of posts- check
Active Lurking- check
Admitted to being a good choice for lynch atm- check
OMGLyncher is SO scummy that he gets a vote.DeathNote wrote:I thought I voted... Guess not
Vote: OMGLyncher
Now it seems that OMGLyncher wasn't actually scummy at all, and he was only voting him becauseDeathNote wrote:Yes [RayFrost] still has the same role but OMG didn't give us anything to go off of for serious votes. He was simply the best option since he lacked the ability to defend himself.
Unvote
OMGLyncher was only making a nooby mistake, now? o_O;DeathNote wrote:What? I was defending [RayFrost] to give them a chance to respond so they wouldn't get lynched right off for what appeared to be a nooby mistake.