To Dorothea, I wish you would've spoken more on your game in your opening speech instead of waiting for the jury to pull it out of you. There weren't questions about what your social strengths were because what part of your game did your opening speech cover if not your social strengths? Regardless, you did play a solid game and was where I thought my vote was going prior to FTC.
To Shamir, you were great to play alongside for much of the game. I guess I'm just not satisfied with your explanation of what you did that didn't benefit Edelgard as well, like it's either things you could've done but didn't or something I have to question if it was even in your benefit(the mutiny) or from so early in the game. Whereas I do feel like Edel addressed the inverse question with her social game explanation and references to individual conversations.
To Edelgard, in my eyes you had a stellar FTC performance. I had actually written a draft of an opening speech while you were busy playing the immunity challenge and taking me out, and you named the majority of my major points from there. I don't really think I would've won but like to think I would've given you and Shamir a rough time. Also just felt alot of your answers to the other jurors were solid and the detail in your opening speech give me an understanding of your game that I didn't have before.
Ultimately, I would be pretty happy to see any of you win.
Vote: Edelgard
