First, I'm sick, so I have to keep this short. I'm going to clear my stand on Brain of Wombat up.
Korts wrote:Rage wrote:Yup, I understood what your view on these events were, but now that you've said that, how is asking one player to claim scummier than asking investigative roles or for a mass claim?
In theory, massclaim is worse. In context, though, considering my point about BoW's possible meta knowledge, and your fairly well-established presence on-site, your action was scummier, because you were trying to force a player to claim with virtually no discussion having happened up until that point.
In context, I asked him to role claim because he asked others to role claim, others which a regular townie could not know exist. He claims regular townie yet he asked investigative roles to claim if they learned anything. This means one of two things.
1) He's a newb and doesn't know the consequences of what he is asking for
2) He's scum trying to out power roles early in the game
I pressured him because not only was it asked in his first post of the game, but because it was asked. I didn't account for how new he was to the site because I've never seen that ploy done before, by anyone, ever, and even then, if he's new, why would he want to attract so much attention to himself? However, now I understand that option-the-first is more likely because he backed down even when others started to stand up for him, but the problem I see with this is that he should still be accountable for his actions. Therefore, I want him to speak up for himself, and not Korts.
Also,
Korts wrote:Rage wrote:Korts wrote:BTW, IGMEOY on everyone who jumped on Rage solely for using a quote from Wombat "out of context", since it was obvious he was misusing the phrase. I will look it up later to see who exactly those people are.
I think I will have something to say about this quote when Korts answers my "you think this is scummier than this" question above. For now, though, it seems like you're setting yourself up for a good attack on one of the player's voting for me if I flip Town, but I don't think anything for certain just yet.
Okay, I've answered. Now you answer, how is that not justification for attacking those who voted you solely for that BS reason?
It's entirely justified to me. It just seemed to me that you were setting yourself for attacking whoever was attacking me if I was to be lynched and turn up a certain way. In my position (first most likely candidate to be lynched when this was said) I have to look out for things like this, where I think I see players hinting at what they're going to do if they successfully contribute to my lynch. I point them out now, and then people are less likely to be lead by the players on my lynch afterwards.
@
Anyone
, is there anything else you'd like me to respond to?