In context, I asked him to role claim because he asked others to role claim, others which a regular townie could not know exist. He claims regular townie yet he asked investigative roles to claim if they learned anything. This means one of two things.Korts wrote:In theory, massclaim is worse. In context, though, considering my point about BoW's possible meta knowledge, and your fairly well-established presence on-site, your action was scummier, because you were trying to force a player to claim with virtually no discussion having happened up until that point.Rage wrote:Yup, I understood what your view on these events were, but now that you've said that, how is asking one player to claim scummier than asking investigative roles or for a mass claim?
It's entirely justified to me. It just seemed to me that you were setting yourself for attacking whoever was attacking me if I was to be lynched and turn up a certain way. In my position (first most likely candidate to be lynched when this was said) I have to look out for things like this, where I think I see players hinting at what they're going to do if they successfully contribute to my lynch. I point them out now, and then people are less likely to be lead by the players on my lynch afterwards.Korts wrote:Okay, I've answered. Now you answer, how is that not justification for attacking those who voted you solely for that BS reason?Rage wrote:I think I will have something to say about this quote when Korts answers my "you think this is scummier than this" question above. For now, though, it seems like you're setting yourself up for a good attack on one of the player's voting for me if I flip Town, but I don't think anything for certain just yet.Korts wrote:BTW, IGMEOY on everyone who jumped on Rage solely for using a quote from Wombat "out of context", since it was obvious he was misusing the phrase. I will look it up later to see who exactly those people are.
Perhaps he thinks that is what he is supposed to do...Korts wrote:What benefit do you suppose he'd have by breadcrumbing to be scum, of all things?ThAdmiral wrote:Furthermore, on the topic of claims, I am going to have to presume that puta has hinted at his/her claim with the lady macbeth stuff and the violent post about killing ecto's cat, and that he/she/it is somehow involved with the serial killer/mafia.
It's what I attacked him for, not that he may be a newb.darkdude wrote:I definitely think it is suspicious that Rage attacked a newbie and then later backtracked saying he didn't know Wombat was new.
A Momentary Lapse of Reason?ThAdmiral wrote:Perhaps he thinks that is what he is supposed to do...Korts wrote:What benefit do you suppose he'd have by breadcrumbing to be scum, of all things?ThAdmiral wrote:Furthermore, on the topic of claims, I am going to have to presume that puta has hinted at his/her claim with the lady macbeth stuff and the violent post about killing ecto's cat, and that he/she/it is somehow involved with the serial killer/mafia.
He's pretty new as well.
It is not in my nature, and my words do contain some truth, if you dig deep enough.Korts wrote:What benefit do you suppose he'd have by breadcrumbing to be scum, of all things?ThAdmiral wrote:Furthermore, on the topic of claims, I am going to have to presume that puta has hinted at his/her claim with the lady macbeth stuff and the violent post about killing ecto's cat, and that he/she/it is somehow involved with the serial killer/mafia.
Puta Puta, you obviouslycanpost other than in Shakespeare quotes, as evidenced by multiple of your posts, therefore I'm ruling out post restriction. Thus, PRs not coming into play, HOW WOULD YOU FEEL ABOUT NOT HINTING AT YOUR ROLE? Unless you're scum, of course.
On a related note, Puta, HOW WOULD YOU FEEL ABOUT ACTUALLY HELPING?
you will soon fall off your ass sitting on the damn fence.Tarballs wrote:Wow, this sure got to a quick start. I don't think I even need to throw a random vote at all.
I don't like BoW's first post at all. Reeks really scummy, especially for the parts that Rage already highlighted. Second post isn't much better either, as he's basically suggesting a No lynch, which is always a bad idea on day one. However, all of these "mistakes" are pretty common for newbies, so I'm not that convinced that BoW is scum. Might be, but I wouldn't take that chance at this point.
Rage, on the other hand, demanded BoW to role claimon page oneand has been very aggressive towards him since... well, the beginning. Not a very warm way to welcome a new player. Rage is either a townie who believes that BoW is scum and is trying to push BoW as much as he can to see if BoW cracks under pressure - or a scum that sees BoW as an easy target to be lynched quickly.
Seeing how Rage's bandwagon has already piled up about 4 or 5 votes, I don't think I'm going to vote anyone just yet. Rage is slightly more suspicious than BoW, but I don't want to put anyone too close to a lynch this early. Mistakes can happen and an accidental lynch is something I wouldn't like to see.
Tarballs buddy.gorckat wrote:Brain comes off as very newbish.
Rage comes off as someone whose gotten to the point of punishing any non-standard play.
dude comes off as scummy for willingness to vote people without any posts at all. That's not lurking, that's potential flaking. Lurking is scummy, flaking is null.
puta's quote is mildly annoying. I don't have a Cliff Notes to Macbeth.
Tarballs comments around his Rage vote are curious.
And after skim back, Rage's claim call is not cool.
vote: Rage
While you used one of my favorite terms, opsies (i like to add another "O",) I've got to think this is a little hinkie.Puta Puta wrote:...I confused my roles/game with another one...opsies...anyways I have no problem with dying....
