Mini 583! BAMPEG!!!....IS THIS THE END???

Tamuz · Post Post #100 (ISO) » Sun Apr 13, 2008 1:02 pm

vote: whome?

chaotic_diablo · Post Post #101 (ISO) » Sun Apr 13, 2008 2:56 pm

Bandwagon vote!

vote whome?

Erg0 · Post Post #102 (ISO) » Sun Apr 13, 2008 3:44 pm

Wow, that was like the day 1 VI lynch in double time.

Like many, I don't really dig WhoMe's reaction to the vote on him - it's not like Coron was pushing for his lynch or anything.

On the other hand, I think JDodge is onto something. Or was that on something? Either way.

Vote: roffman

pickemgenius · Post Post #103 (ISO) » Sun Apr 13, 2008 3:45 pm

ROX WON! VOTECOUNT FOR DAY 2!

WhoMe?(3)-Coron,Tamuz,chaotic_diablo

roffman(3)-Jdodge,dahill1,Erg0

Tamuz(1)-scotmany12
Erg0(1)-KaleiÐoscøpe
Coron(1)-WhoMe?

NOT VOTING:

roffman

10 alive 6 to lynch.

DL APRIL 27th ~10PM

Edited with Erg0s vote added.

Coron · Post Post #104 (ISO) » Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:57 pm

Confirm vote: WhoMe?

WhoMe? · Post Post #105 (ISO) » Sun Apr 13, 2008 7:23 pm

Erg0 wrote:Like many, I don't really dig WhoMe's reaction to the vote on him - it's not like Coron was pushing for his lynch or anything.

Vote: roffman

Look at my reasons for my return vote. The fact he is voting me is incidental, it is the yeah im voting you, i have good reason honest i fom but when pressed all he can answer is "you look scummy" or "I think you're scummy" without giving anything to back that up. I would be voting him if he were voting someone else with the sane reasoning.

Tamuz · Post Post #106 (ISO) » Sun Apr 13, 2008 7:40 pm

Mountain.
Molehill.

Your reaction is scumtastic.

WhoMe? · Post Post #107 (ISO) » Sun Apr 13, 2008 8:37 pm

Tamuz wrote:Mountain.
Molehill.

Your reaction is scumtastic.

So I'm the only one who has a concern with all these votes without explanation? Fine.

Erg0 · Post Post #108 (ISO) » Sun Apr 13, 2008 8:38 pm

What were you expecting at this stage of the game? It's not like we gleaned a wealth of knowledge from day 1.

Tamuz · Post Post #109 (ISO) » Sun Apr 13, 2008 9:58 pm

Scum probably did.

Right Whome??

WhoMe? · Post Post #110 (ISO) » Sun Apr 13, 2008 10:18 pm

Erg0 wrote:What were you expecting at this stage of the game? It's not like we gleaned a wealth of knowledge from day 1.

And if people were saying this is basically a random vote I could live with that. What I won't let slide is people claiming they have good reason to be voting, who can't then provide that reason.

roffman · Post Post #111 (ISO) » Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:56 am

hooray for bandwagons. BTW, could people please post whether or not their votes are meaningless or actually post the reasons and thought behind them

Coron · Post Post #112 (ISO) » Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:58 am

roffman wrote:hooray for bandwagons. BTW, could people please post whether or not their votes are meaningless or actually post the reasons and thought behind them

Ok, I choose to answer the first part. My vote is not meaningless.

JDodge · Post Post #113 (ISO) » Mon Apr 14, 2008 5:22 am

My vote also is not meaningless.

But WhoMe is a poor lynch for today. I need a while longer to understand if this is classic WhoMe play or actual scumminess. roffman, on the other hand, definite scum.

Erg0 · Post Post #114 (ISO) » Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:55 am

There's no such thing as a meaningless vote.

Not for me, anyway.

dahill1 · Post Post #115 (ISO) » Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:14 am

JDodge wrote:My vote also is not meaningless.

But WhoMe is a poor lynch for today. I need a while longer to understand if this is classic WhoMe play or actual scumminess. roffman, on the other hand, definite scum.

so far this seems to me like what WhoMe normally is like

JDodge · Post Post #116 (ISO) » Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:02 pm

And this knowledge comes from?

dahill1 · Post Post #117 (ISO) » Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:31 pm

ongoing game

Tamuz · Post Post #118 (ISO) » Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:46 pm

JDodge wrote:My vote also is not meaningless.

But WhoMe is a poor lynch for today. I need a while longer to understand if this is classic WhoMe play or actual scumminess. roffman, on the other hand, definite scum.

Just because you can't understand and decide yet what your opinion on his actions are doesn't mean the rest of us, Coron included, haven't. Stating its a bad lynch based on only your, at the moment, null opinion is wrong imo.

chaotic_diablo · Post Post #119 (ISO) » Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:48 pm

My vote isn't meaningless. Mainly because it is contributing to a majority bandwagon. Other than that, Whome?'s cries over a single vote puts him into superdefensive mode. My vote is staying there at the moment for the metagame on an "ongoing" game that dahill1 provided or not provided, whichever works.

scotmany12 · Post Post #120 (ISO) » Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:31 am

Defending yourself is not a scum tell. There is no such thing as being overdefensive. I do not support the WhoMe wagon.

dahill1 · Post Post #121 (ISO) » Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:45 am

scotmany12 wrote:Defending yourself is not a scum tell. There is no such thing as being overdefensive. I do not support the WhoMe wagon.

well it looks like we have all 3 scum
today we should lynch roffman, then decide about who goes next

JDodge · Post Post #122 (ISO) » Tue Apr 15, 2008 3:24 am

dahill is a fine lynch too.

Tamuz wrote:Just because you can't understand and decide yet what your opinion on his actions are doesn't mean the rest of us, Coron included, haven't. Stating its a bad lynch based on only your, at the moment, null opinion is wrong imo.

And your experience playing with WhoMe is...?

This goes for everyone voting for him as well.

scotmany12 · Post Post #123 (ISO) » Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:47 am

Unvote, vote: dahill

I don't recall it saying anywhere that there is 3 scum...

dahill1 · Post Post #124 (ISO) » Tue Apr 15, 2008 11:25 am

scotmany12 wrote:
Unvote, vote: dahill

I don't recall it saying anywhere that there is 3 scum...

i assumed there was because that is the norm in all of the games i've played so far