Mini 583! BAMPEG!!!....IS THIS THE END???

Tamuz · Post Post #26 (isolation #1) » Fri Apr 04, 2008 10:32 am

vote: WhoMe

Why do you know Coron's own motive?
Can't you just take his reason at face value?

Tamuz · Post Post #30 (isolation #2) » Fri Apr 04, 2008 12:17 pm

unvote, vote: Tamuz
fos:scottmany

LAL

Tamuz · Post Post #35 (isolation #3) » Sat Apr 05, 2008 7:44 am

We should probably get serious?

Tamuz · Post Post #42 (isolation #4) » Sat Apr 05, 2008 10:15 pm

Its day one without a night.
If JDodge could have information to know that Scopey is scum at this point the game would be bastardized. And not the good kind of Bastardized, the bad kind

Tamuz · Post Post #47 (isolation #5) » Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:14 am

Because I'm scum with you Jdodge?

Tamuz · Post Post #56 (isolation #6) » Sun Apr 06, 2008 8:51 pm

Psychatrog wrote:EBWOP: Tamuz's statement did not seem like a "zomg i am scum" slip to me.

Duh!

Did you read Jdogde's statement. If you take his assertion that it was a slip then it would assert that HE is scum with me and Scope. So either you have 3 scum nailed just like that... or he is fucking around.

Tamuz · Post Post #59 (isolation #7) » Mon Apr 07, 2008 5:27 am

JDodge wrote:
Tamuz wrote:Its day one without a night.
If JDodge could have information to know that Scopey is scum at this point the game would be bastardized. And not the good kind of Bastardized, the bad kind
Unless
I
myself
am scum
with Scopey. How did you not see that possibility, I wonder? Because you know my alignment already?

Unvote, vote: Tamuz

I don't care so much what you think ergo, I care more about whats there, mainly that gem. Jdodge puts up a hypothetical of him being scum. Yeah, cool, how could you misread that? (not implying that I think Jdodge is scum...)

I feel nobody else is really trying to get serious in this game.

Tamuz · Post Post #73 (isolation #8) » Mon Apr 07, 2008 2:55 pm

unvote:Tamuz
vote:Jdodge

My bad busbuddy.
Can I sit next to you in the back with all the cool kids?

Tamuz · Post Post #84 (isolation #9) » Sat Apr 12, 2008 10:18 pm

He thinks I'm cute?

Tamuz · Post Post #100 (isolation #10) » Sun Apr 13, 2008 1:02 pm

vote: whome?

Tamuz · Post Post #106 (isolation #11) » Sun Apr 13, 2008 7:40 pm

Mountain.
Molehill.

Your reaction is scumtastic.

Tamuz · Post Post #109 (isolation #12) » Sun Apr 13, 2008 9:58 pm

Scum probably did.

Right Whome??

Tamuz · Post Post #118 (isolation #13) » Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:46 pm

JDodge wrote:My vote also is not meaningless.

But WhoMe is a poor lynch for today. I need a while longer to understand if this is classic WhoMe play or actual scumminess. roffman, on the other hand, definite scum.

Just because you can't understand and decide yet what your opinion on his actions are doesn't mean the rest of us, Coron included, haven't. Stating its a bad lynch based on only your, at the moment, null opinion is wrong imo.

Tamuz · Post Post #130 (isolation #14) » Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:44 am

Tamuz · Post Post #138 (isolation #15) » Thu Apr 17, 2008 6:14 am

Because there is not proof that Erg0 is scum. Mafia isn't run on your whims, its run on best case scenarios in regards to solid logic.

Tamuz · Post Post #143 (isolation #16) » Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:55 am

WhoMe? wrote:
Tamuz wrote:Because there is not proof that Erg0 is scum. Mafia isn't run on your whims, its run on best case scenarios in regards to solid logic.
gonna be very hard for youi to get logic involved, when no one is willing to give their thoughts and reasoning behing their votes. There is no proof that
anyone
is scum, which is why we need some insight into peoples motivations, and is why I am suspicious of those not willing to be more open.

Pstt kids, I asked for logic explaining why I should vote Erg-. Me making a seemingly logicless vote based on my own decision is one thing. Following someone else's seemingly logicless vote based on nothing is another. That second thing is bad.
You will not get me to vote something else by "why not" if you construct a case, maybe. I do, however reserve my own right to vote in accordance to how I feel. People should not carte blanc vote with me how I feel though (applying to the entirety of players as well). I'd think it more concerning if people just leapt on Scopes "reasoning". Then they have a mindless vote, and they can hide behind scum. Neither are good for the town.

Whome?, I can certainly get logic involved. It why I'm voting you.

JDodge/scumbuddy: Why is it exactly that we want to grill Erg0 in the first place. I agree we can't grill him without lighting the grill, but I'd certainly hate to grill a boot because you tell me to and then realize as I bite into it that it isn't a juicy stake

Tamuz · Post Post #153 (isolation #17) » Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:34 pm

+1 scotmany

Tamuz · Post Post #157 (isolation #18) » Sat Apr 19, 2008 4:12 pm

Coron wrote:So, why aren't people voting Whome??

Tamuz · Post Post #164 (isolation #19) » Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:47 am

Whome?'s overdefensive reaction to a single vote against himself is what has me voting for him.

Tamuz · Post Post #170 (isolation #20) » Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:14 pm

Doing so in a way that I see as scummy is.

I didn't say his defending himself is scummy.

Misreading or misleading others on my words is actually what is scummy. yeah?

Tamuz · Post Post #213 (isolation #21) » Thu Apr 24, 2008 7:27 am

Jdodge, you are so bent on this whome? meta. Its kinda sick... Just because you have played with him before doesn't mean you have a 100% read on him, nor does it mean that he is acting the same and aligned the same as in previous games you have had with him. Stop trying to undercut people because they've been in less spamgames than you, or at least less games with the people in this game.

Tamuz · Post Post #219 (isolation #22) » Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:52 pm

You have implied it by attacking my vote based on that meta.

Tamuz · Post Post #222 (isolation #23) » Thu Apr 24, 2008 4:39 pm

Duh.

You're still attacking my vote based on a silly meta. Therefore you ARE supporting Whome? by attacking votes against him. Did I ever say you said he was innocent? I don't remember, but I don't really recall saying that...

Tamuz · Post Post #233 (isolation #24) » Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:17 am

unvote

Tamuz · Post Post #263 (isolation #25) » Wed Apr 30, 2008 11:30 pm

That and having two cops is a bit... scary. Although If we do I can ascertain that WhoMe? isn't insane, I am innocent, and he is obviously not naive or paranoid.

The rest of you can't take my word for that, and I accept that. So we're still stuck with two cops, neither weakened and looking at how that would play for town balance.

If I have a night action it does not duplicate night abilities.

Tamuz · Post Post #272 (isolation #26) » Fri May 02, 2008 4:23 pm

Tamuz wrote: If I have a night action it does not duplicate night abilities.

Tamuz · Post Post #278 (isolation #27) » Sun May 04, 2008 10:59 pm

Are we playing?

Tamuz · Post Post #293 (isolation #28) » Tue May 06, 2008 9:59 pm

True.

Why did you choose chaotic to investigate?

Why did you choose me?

Tamuz · Post Post #306 (isolation #29) » Fri May 09, 2008 5:43 pm

vote: Chaotic_diablo

Lets get pursuing this...

Tamuz · Post Post #309 (isolation #30) » Sat May 10, 2008 4:31 pm

From Jr High?

Congrats

THANKS IT WAS REALY HARD!

Tamuz · Post Post #314 (isolation #31) » Sat May 10, 2008 6:55 pm

It kinda doesn't make sense with whome? lying if roffman is telling the truth and vice versa. Its like a paper card house, mildy floppy and prone to being knocked down, but more solid than a single card.

I can accept that he is not insane, I'm innocent, I came up as innocent. Coo, no?

Tamuz · Post Post #316 (isolation #32) » Sat May 10, 2008 10:19 pm

Can anyone find ergo breadcrumbing multiple results.

Tamuz · Post Post #325 (isolation #33) » Mon May 12, 2008 8:16 am

cd your posts don't make sense.

If WM? is scum and got motivated but didn't use the second kill how is it that he would have known to reveal double.

If roff is scum and WM? is real then how did WM? get double results

The only possibility is that they are both scum and this is a ballsy as hell gambit.

Tamuz · Post Post #329 (isolation #34) » Mon May 12, 2008 9:58 am

duh. theres a reason I didn't write that one.

Scott. I know I'm innocent, so to me that clears up the sanity issue to me.

Can someone refresh me on WM?'s other investigation? He should have 3, right?

Tamuz · Post Post #332 (isolation #35) » Mon May 12, 2008 12:34 pm

I know scott, I've said that before.

Tamuz · Post Post #333 (isolation #36) » Mon May 12, 2008 12:34 pm

Speaking of Jdodge, I haven't heard from him or Coron for a while.

Tamuz · Post Post #335 (isolation #37) » Mon May 12, 2008 9:34 pm

Motivated investigation could be insane, although chances are Erg0 would have seen and figured that out his investigations. I think we are safe to think he had 2 like investigation and the two like investigations weren't scum.

Tamuz · Post Post #338 (isolation #38) » Tue May 13, 2008 7:05 am

If I'm the motivator whats up with rofflesmans

Tamuz · Post Post #363 (isolation #39) » Fri May 16, 2008 10:23 pm

wow.... way to fucking go dizzy...