Mini 495 - Mafia on a Plane! GAME OVER! =)

[AlyG]

however, i do agree that its been a little too soon for that kind of thinking. we should be eliminating the lurkers only after at least a day or two.

oh well, was just trying to get the game moving. my vote stands though

(1) You just said the opposite of your previous post! What made you completely change your thoughts on how we should play? Because you got voted for?

(2) What do you mean you were trying to get the game moving?

[AlyG]

ill wait and see. will make better judgment once everyone has posted and whatnot

do me a favor and dont lynch me while im away

(1) That's better logic. Judge and vote for someone after they have talked. Not if they haven't even confirmed their PM!

(2) Whatever. But if you're seen online it would seem your trying to draw attention from yourself.

Originality, your push for a quicklynch on someone who hasn't even confirmed their PM really worries me. It got me to believe that you may be a scum trying to draw attention from yourself and trying to avoid getting lynched.

Then, when you got voted for for that reason you seemed to completely change your thoughts. Maybe you realised you were under pressure and tried to keep yourself safe and get on peole's good side by agreeing with them.

However after your change of thoughts your vote still standed. Which was also suspicious. I don't know whether to vote you or not since your already at -3 so for now i will

FOS: Originality

This will probably change to a vote.

That's it, those are my thoughts. sorry about the triple post guys. I'm only new and i don't know how to put more than 1 quote in a post at once >_< can someone tell me how?

[Carrotcake]

[quote= "name1"] Whatever [/ quote]
[quote= "name2"] Whatever [/ quote]
[quote= "name3"] Whatever [/ quote]
Remove all the spaces inside the braces, and just play around with it. Don't forget the quotation marks. I see people double post all the time, so it isn't a bad thing as far as I know.

[Oman]

Hey the game started!
I'm here, I'll read the last 7 posts and post my random vote.

[AlyG]

And now we wait...

[Oman]

Okay.

1) Originality looks BAD! Contradiction, eager to lynch, LEAPS to defence. Almost worth a -2 vote.

2) If Originality is scum I'd be expecting a coach in there. But everyone looked clean.

3)

Vote: orginality

I just want to see what pops up scum should jump on him

[Lucienne]

Sorry, just got online. I tried logging on on Sunday, but it failed to recognise my username or something. Anyhoo here I am.

[AlyG]

That's great! What do you think of of how the game is going so far?

And after a very short re-read >_> i'll first

Unvote: Oman

Random voting time is over. And originality, if you don't come up with a good defence i'll be voting for you which means you'll already at 4 votes. Not good.

[Lucienne]

Firstlt, carrotcake called me a boy.

How man boys called Lucienne do you know?

On more pressing matters, I`m not liking originiality for his lurker voting, and opinions that there are no strong reasons for voting. His opinions are entirely flawed here - voting on Day 1 can be strong and for good reasons, and similarly voting for lurkers is not a good strategy in this scenario. I disagree that not posting on confirming for around 2 days is inherent lurking.

That said, I`m not liking Oman`s vote here, as he basically adds nothing yet puts him to -2. Seems like some early scum bandwagoning to me.

[Dr. Blackstrike]

FOS: Originality

But I'm not sure all this jumping on him so quickly is a good idea...

[Oman]

And after a very short re-read >_> i'll first Unvote: Oman Random voting time is over. .

Who said I random voted?

[Oman]

EBWOP:
If you look at my post originality is a claculated vote, with actual reasons.

[Lucienne]

EBWOP:
If you look at my post originality is a claculated vote, with actual reasons.

Uh, he was quite clearly referring to his vote.

[Oman]

Oh right, I thought he was citing it as a reason to vote me.

[spurgistan]

So nothing for a while from Originality except for a complete contradiction of everything he said... any chance he's the jester?

[VampanezeHunter]

Aw! IS random voting over? Oh well

Unvote

. Oman is top of my list because of Lurker voting thing.

[VampanezeHunter]

EBWOP: I meant originality!

[shaft.ed]

Okay.

1) Originality looks BAD! Contradiction,

eager to lynch

, LEAPS to defence. Almost worth a -2 vote.

2) If Originality is scum I'd be expecting a coach in there. But everyone looked clean.

3)

Vote: orginality

I just want to see what pops up scum should jump on him

So you add a fourth vote to someone that is eager to lynch. You may want to look at your own track record. This fourth vote comes on p.2 on your second post approximately 1hr after you have even begun to read the thread, and one post after you say

Hey the game started!
I'm here, I'll read the last 7 posts and post my random vote.

"Hey Mr. Kettle, you're black" said the pot.

FoS Oman

[originality]

Guys, youve got me completely missunderstood. First of all, it is my opinion that we have a big chance of

not

getting scum on the first day, because we really have almost nothing to go on.

That being said, i, as most of the people in the first page, picked a reason that appealed to me best and just voted on the lurker. Im not being agressive in that i want everyone to vote for them, and i did not take my vote away because there was really no reason to. But, obviously, as lucienne just posted, i will

unvote lucienne

.


And those of you accusing me to be scum. i did not bandwaggon anything. it was a well-reasoned vote. and i did not contradict myself, i understood my accuser's point that it was too early and agreed. but i hadnt any better voting to do, so i kept on lucienne.

anywho, im town. so stop voting for me, thanks.

[originality]

Also, if i was contradicting myself and having a complete change of heart, id have unvoted earlier, dont you think?

[Streeflo]

Votecount #2:

originality (4) - Carrotcake, spurgistan, Elias_the_thief, Oman
CarrotCake (1) - shaft.ed
VampanezeHunter (1) - Dr. Blackstrike
spurgistan (1) - thesleepless

Not voting: Everyone else

With

12

alive it takes

7

to lynch!

Remember, feel free to ask for a votecount or prod at any time!

[Oman]

Okay well that went for a while and nothing popped up.

If you copy the last line in my 1,2,3, post:

3) Vote: orginality I just want to see what pops up scum should jump on him

Unfortunatly, it was less effective than I had hoped.

Unvote

Early townie vibes from: shaft.ed

Early scummy vibes from: spurgistan. I put on a -2 vote, and he didn't even acknowledge it. Maybe hoping the lynch goes through?

[VampanezeHunter]

I haven't really seen enough to judge anyone. I have evr so slight gut feelings on a few people but in the next few pages I will express my views on people.

[spurgistan]

Oman: who put what on a -2 vote? Originality only got to -3. I'm also not sure why I would have aknowledged that fact even if it was true, that should be the job of the person voting, do'ncha think?

[Elias_the_thief]

And those of you accusing me to be scum. i did not bandwaggon anything.

There is nothing wrong with bandwagoning.

it was a well-reasoned vote.

I strongly disagree.

and i did not contradict myself, i understood my accuser's point that it was too early and agreed. but i hadnt any better voting to do, so i kept on lucienne.

Alright. What you did really wasnt too strong of a a scumtell. Its just as much a newbie tell as anything, and as far as i can tell this is one of your first games (i looked for other games with you in them and couldnt find any).
Therefore,

unvote

. I suppose I should be turning my attention elsewhere (for now).

Okay.

1) Originality looks BAD! Contradiction, eager to lynch, LEAPS to defence. Almost worth a -2 vote.

2) If Originality is scum I'd be expecting a coach in there. But everyone looked clean.

3)

Vote: orginality

I just want to see what pops up scum should jump on him

Oman in his last post clearly seemed to think that Originality got to -2...So why does he say that Originality is

almost

worth a -2 vote, yet does it anyways? Hmm. Not to mention his vote looks opportunistic.

vote: Oman

.