Mini 1636: Mafialand Mayhem! - [Game Over]

KatieB · Post Post #100 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:26 am

And you still haven't explained why I'm scum.

Luca Blight · Post Post #101 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:30 am

In post 100, KatieB wrote:And you still haven't explained why I'm scum.

...

In post 98, Luca Blight wrote:You can't explain your 'probtown' read on Lapsa.

You devalued the 'probtown' read by labeling it a 'page five probtown' read.

You scumread three players for talking about irrelevant things, when your 'probtown' read has done this far more than anyone.

You keep avoiding my questions and instead try and discredit and dismiss everything I say.

You're the one calling me 'badposting scum' but haven't given a single valid reason as to why, so you can add hypocrisy to the increasing list of scumminess.

KatieB · Post Post #102 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:31 am

Right but I'm not posting a 'case.' You are. And it's a case that nowhere ever actually suggests a scum motivation for anything I've done.

KatieB · Post Post #103 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:35 am

For clarity, I'm scumreading Luca first because of his terrible vote on Lapsa, then his terrible OMGUS on me. I'm scumreading Wake for focusing on silly stuff like how much fluff should be allowed in a game, and Anen because he wasn't just posting fluff, he was

looking for things to talk about that were irrelevant to the game.

Like,

instead of

discussing the game.

Luca Blight · Post Post #104 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:41 am

In post 103, KatieB wrote:For clarity, I'm scumreading Luca first because of his terrible vote on Lapsa

Terrible how?

In post 103, KatieB wrote:then his terrible OMGUS on me.

Clearly not OMGUS by any stretch.

KatieB · Post Post #105 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:42 am

Oh I must have misused the word. What's it called when someone is suspicious of you based only on the fact that you're suspicious of them?

Luca Blight · Post Post #106 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:45 am

In post 105, KatieB wrote:Oh I must have misused the word. What's it called when someone is suspicious of you based only on the fact that you're suspicious of them?

You're deliberately misrepping me.

KatieB · Post Post #107 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:46 am

Really? Which of your 'reasons' is indicative of scum and why?

Riddleton · Post Post #108 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:47 am

Votecount 1.3

Wake88 (2): Aneninen, Aeronaut
evilpacman18 (2): KatieB
curiouskarmadog (1): MonkeyMan576
Ollie (1): curiouskarmadog
KatieB (1): Luca Blight
BP (1): llll

Not voting (6): evilpacman18, Lapsa, BP, Drake Crusader, Wake88, Ollie,

With 13 players alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

The deadline for Day 1 is in (expired on 2015-01-12 21:44:00).

Luca Blight · Post Post #109 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:49 am

In post 107, KatieB wrote:Really? Which of your 'reasons' is indicative of scum and why?

You acknowledge the reasons when it suits, otherwise label it OMGUS.

I will probably elaborate on this later, but I have said enough for now. I want to hear others thoughts instead of it being just us bickering in this thread.

KatieB · Post Post #110 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 10:59 am

I mean, he voted Lapsa for 'fluffposting more than Anen' and 'poorly justifying his vote on Anen' which happened before Anen had even posted, and was pretty clearly a RVS vote. Even if Lapsa had done any of the things Luca was talking about, none of them would be alignment indicative.

He's scumreading me for calling Lapsa probtown, but dollars to doughnuts if I hadn't clarified that my feelings are as strong as p5 allows, he'd be scumreading me for having feelings too strong for day 1.

He's scumreading me for not hopping to answer him (which is not indicative of scum), scumreading me for a misunderstanding of my feelings on my suspects (even if his thoughts were accurate, this would not be indicative of scum), for 'not making any sense' (which is not indicative of scum), and for being dismissive of his reasons for scumreading me (which he hasn't yet presented.)

Pretty obviously scum looking for a day1 mislynch that involves a lot of words but not reasons. As soon as everyone has posted, I'd be glad to turbolynch him.

p-edit: but not having any reasons for scumreading me totally doesn't make his vote OMGUS. Totally.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #111 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:10 am

Katie seems to be very defensive and emotional regarding this wagon. This is indicative of scum.

Unvote:

Vote: Katie

I agree Luca's vote was not OMGUS. He clearly pointed out his reasoning. OMGUS is a defensive responce vote without any clear reasoning other than wanting to divert your own wagon.

sthar8 · Post Post #112 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:12 am

I am neither of those, nor are they indicative of scum. Please explain how any of his reasoning makes sense.

KatieB · Post Post #113 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:13 am

In post 112, sthar8 wrote:I am neither of those, nor are they indicative of scum. Please explain how any of his reasoning makes sense.

Dammit. What I get for playing under the influence.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #114 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:14 am

Is star8 a Katie alt? Because star8 isn't in the game, as far as I can tell

KatieB · Post Post #115 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:14 am

other way around, buddy.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #116 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:16 am

Being defensive and emotional is indicative of scum, because scum are more worried about their own survival because there are fewer of them than town. Town worry about scum hunting over survival.

Also, saying someone is probtown this early in the game sounds like someone trying to whiteknight their scum partner.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #117 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:25 am

In post 85, KatieB wrote:

curiouskarmadog wrote:
In post 78, KatieB wrote:

Is everyone here yet?

how closely would you say you are reading the game?

I'm reading the game, but I haven't checklisted the playerlist against the posts. I figured someone else would already have done it, making that a waste of my time.

so you have seen my posts then right?

KatieB · Post Post #118 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:28 am

yes?

@ monkey, I'm being neither defensive nor emotional.

BUT, even if I were, those are also newbie tells for both alignments, which is the persona I was playing.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #119 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:30 am

"playing a persona" indicates you have something to hide.

KatieB · Post Post #120 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:31 am

Or that I'm playing as a secret alt?

KatieB · Post Post #121 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:32 am

Like, I just altslipped in the thread and then swore about it. Are you suggesting that I knew what alignment I'd be before I signed up for the game and chose to play as an alt in order to have more things to lie about?

KatieB · Post Post #122 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:32 am

That is like, the thickest thing I have read all day.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #123 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:32 am

In post 78, KatieB wrote:
This is my third game, so no idea what my strengths are.

In post 112, sthar8 wrote:I am neither of those, nor are they indicative of scum. Please explain how any of his reasoning makes sense.

wait what? so was this a lie? can you answer his question now?

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #124 (ISO) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:35 am

curiouskarmadog wrote:
In post 78, KatieB wrote:

Is everyone here yet?

how closely would you say you are reading the game?

I'm reading the game, but I haven't checklisted the playerlist against the posts. I figured someone else would already have done it, making that a waste of my time.[/quote]

so you have seen my posts then right?[/quote]

In post 118, KatieB wrote:yes?

if you have seen my posts, where is my vote and why?

to be clear, this is coming from this post.

In post 78, KatieB wrote:

Is everyone here yet?