Space Monkey Mafia: GAME OVER!

MrBuddyLee · Post Post #156 (ISO) » Sun Nov 12, 2006 10:44 am

vote: inHim.

He should definitely not be vote-free at this juncture.

ISO · Post Post #157 (ISO) » Sun Nov 12, 2006 11:19 am

depending on how bird goes I may join you.

although you chalking this to inhim's playstyle then voting him for it is interesting and noted.

Nightson · Post Post #158 (ISO) » Sun Nov 12, 2006 10:50 pm

Yay, we're back.

unvote

because I have no idea who I'm voting for.

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #159 (ISO) » Sun Nov 12, 2006 10:50 pm

Well, we're back again. As before, anyone who doesn't post in this thread within 7 days of this post will be replaced.

Post Crash Vote Count

bird1111: 4 (Twito, STD, Sarcastro, CES)
MrBuddyLee: 3 (Fritzler, klebian, inHimshallibe)
Phoebus: 2 (Bogre, dahen)
Sarcastro: 2 (Phoebus, Glork)
Glork: 1 (ibeasha)
inHimshallibe: 1 (MBL)

It will take 9 of you to throw someone out of the airlock.

Once everyone has either checked-in or been replaced, I am going to set a deadline.

dahen · Post Post #160 (ISO) » Sun Nov 12, 2006 11:13 pm

Ah, we're back. Great.
And I'm here! *waves*

I don't see a reason to change my vote yet. Let's see what a re-read can do.

ibaesha · Post Post #161 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 5:07 am

I'm happy with my Glork-vote for now. I don't really have time to look at the game more deeply right now as I'm out of town on a family emergency.

Glork · Post Post #162 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 5:47 am

Yeah, I'm here. Can we stop being dumb and start lynching the bad guys?

Fritzler · Post Post #163 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 5:48 am

unvote, vote: bird?

bird1111 · Post Post #164 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:10 am

I'm here, and am still wondering why there are votes on Glork for normal early day 1 behavior.

Glork · Post Post #165 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:26 am

bird1111 wrote:I'm here, and am still wondering why there are votes on Glork for normal early day 1 behavior.

I believe Fritz already answered that:

Fritzler wrote:
bird1111 wrote:Not seeing why people are finding Nightson/Glork suspicious for typical early day 1 behavior
cuz theyre idiots and don't realize glork has mroe than one typical day 1 behavior

Your continued defense of me is noted, Bird. Are you trying to make all happy-happy with Glorky to get on his good side?

Cogito Ergo Sum · Post Post #166 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:36 am

No, he's trying to make you look bad, because we're lynching that scummy scum-scum.

ISO · Post Post #167 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:59 am

He's clinging on to you and you are distancing yourself from him. Hmmm.

I still want you to tell me why you asked me that question, Glork.

Glork · Post Post #168 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 7:10 am

You mean "What's your point, StD?"

I want you to elaborate on why you're interpreting inHim's words as such.

Glork · Post Post #169 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 7:18 am

Also yes, StD, I'm disassociating myself with Bird. I don't think he's scum right now, but if he

does

turn out to be a scumbag, I already know where the conversation is going to lead. I've picked up a rampantly paranoid attitude towards this game. Being widely and intently attacked for perfectly normal (for me, anyway) behavior tends to do that.

"OMG GLROK IS BEING RIDICULOUS!! SCUMBUAGGZORZ!"

"OMG BIRD DEFENDED LGORK! OBV THEY ARE SCUMBUDDEEZ!"

ISO · Post Post #170 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 7:27 am

Glork wrote:I want you to elaborate on why you're interpreting inHim's words as such.

He said he wasn't doing something that in my mind he clearly was doing.

I wanna know your stake in this

HOLY SHIT I LOST TRACK OF TIME I'M SUPPOSED TO BE TAKING A MATH TEST RIGHT NOW MORE LATER

ISO · Post Post #171 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 8:39 am

don't be so paranoid, glork, I only said "hmm"

*hands glork a cookie*

seriously. Inhim and bird are scum guys. Let's kill 'em both.

Bogre · Post Post #172 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 9:15 am

Ahh, Ms is back up.

Why do you think inhim is scum with birdy?

Birdy, I admit, is really trying to suck up to glorky.

ISO · Post Post #173 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 10:51 am

Mmm I dunno if they're scum together. I'm just pretty sure that

inhim + bird > 0 scum.

klebian · Post Post #174 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:33 am

dahen wrote:My experience says however that it's more common for scum to point out suckups than to actually suckup.

Lawl

inHimshallibe · Post Post #175 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:47 am

Save The Dragons wrote:
inHimshallibe wrote:
vote: MBL
Translation: I have no reason to vote MBL, but I'll join the wagon anyway!

QFT

inHimshallibe wrote:Instincts tell me to vote for bird, but I want MBL to die too much for instincts.
Translation: Bird is probably scummier, but it's funny to vote for MBL!

Not quite as true. I wanted to see if an early lynch candidate could be pushed to the end of the line. Since I think the way in which the MBL lynch has now collapsed, I'm much more inclined to vote for him at the moment over bird.

inHimshallibe wrote:
MrBuddyLee wrote:Your schtick is not looking particularly helpful at this point, but you're sure trying hard to appear helpful.
So you
are
scum this game...
Translation: About a week later, I've found a pretty lame reason (but a reason none the less) to vote MBL!

LOL

It's way too simple to vote someone then come up with a reason later. You had no possible motivation for your MBL vote, and then you start building a case.

My only case has been the collapse of the lynch. Nothing else, really, I don't think.

Nightson · Post Post #176 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:56 am

bird1111 wrote:I'm here, and am still wondering why there are votes on Glork for normal early day 1 behavior.

You're getting the most votes and this is all you have to say? Newsflash, Glork only has half the votes you do.

vote: bird

And now he's got slightly less then half.

Inhim I don't find suspicious.

Still kinda suspicious of StD, but not enough for a vote right now.

MrBuddyLee · Post Post #177 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 12:18 pm

Gee, I'd have thought the MBL-wagon should have held strong too. It was SO well-founded.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #178 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 12:22 pm

MrBuddyLee wrote:Gee, I'd have thought the MBL-wagon should have held strong too. It was SO well-founded.

So will everything else be on Day 1.

ISO · Post Post #179 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:26 pm

inHimshallibe wrote:Not quite as true. I wanted to see if an early lynch candidate could be pushed to the end of the line. Since I think the way in which the MBL lynch has now collapsed, I'm much more inclined to vote for him at the moment over bird.

Sigh.

Translation: This wagon got to its speed obviously not because scum were on the wagon but because the wagon was based on a scumball!

inHimshallibe wrote:My only case has been the collapse of the lynch. Nothing else, really, I don't think.

And my point still stands. Pick a pony and stick with it until it dies. Why a protown person would do this is beyond me.[/quote]

You're looking more apetizing thank a tofurkey on Thanksgiving right now. Hmm. That metaphor's going to missed on a lot of people. How about, you're looking more apetizing than a chocolate cake after dinner, maybe?

Your sliding onto the bandwagon while still finding me suspicious and not finding scumee mcgee suspicious is noted, Nightson. Seriously, that vote is ringin' bells.

Nightson · Post Post #180 (ISO) » Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:46 pm

Save The Dragons wrote:
Your sliding onto the bandwagon while still finding me suspicious and not finding scumee mcgee suspicious is noted, Nightson. Seriously, that vote is ringin' bells.

When I posted (started the post) inhim hadn't made his last two posts. His last two posts are pretty scummy. The vote is there until I see bird actually address he fact that he's the vote leader.