TWN called cults 1337 and wondered if small furde man was a recruiter. He wondered if small furde man was 1337 or not. He wondered if he and kirby were linked or not, then unvoted, and voted m4yhem because he dislikes the poketalk.
ShadowLurker nailed my restriction on the head, and then said I should be glad PJ isn't in the game just due to his wordiness. He then voted smashy, on account of two dogs. Twomz unvoted, then voted twn for promoting antitown groups. Lordy OMGUS voted ziliu, saying his restriction is real. Nightson demanded seven more people vote for ziliu.
Lordy re-posted, and re-voted for ziliu, remembering to unvote first. Ziliu expressed confusion at the bandwagon, said it was unlikely that the second occurance of a restriction would be the untoward one, though he doesn't think smashy is scum, either. And he likes my posts (yaaaaay!). So ziliu, you can have a bone.
Nightson says he wants ziliu dead. CES unvoted, then voted ziliu. Nightson gave CES a cookie, who ate it. m4yhem, clearly talking in encoded pika, albeit not a code I follow, expressed irritation at Ether, then voted for CDB.
kirbyphreak said he's not counterclaiming anyone, but that twn was kind of coutnerclaiming him, but that the restrictions aren't similar at all.
CDB demanded small furde man not be so scummy in asking people what their restrictions are, and voted for him, and would someone shut up m4yhem.
Okay, that said, I really don't think the ziliu/smashy thing is the way to go, at least not on current grounds. The restrictions are pretty dissimilar, which becomes clearer and clearer as they post. A restriction of scooby-doo is in no way even close to the same as a restriction of a dog.
Nightson and CES have both caught my eye in this most recent round-- I can't tell what their restrictions are, beyond that they're both very terse.
I'm going to
unvote
, and
vote
Nightson
. I'd like a bit more clarity on that restriction, please.[/b]
c
