Mini 195 - FeejSquare! (Game Over!)

[mathcam]

Vote: Mathcam

He's still highest on my list. He's not consistent, he took forever to post. I'm almost SURE he's scum.

I'm not sure I understand your "consistency" argument, and I took forever to post because I forgot the game had started. Could you elaborate?

Cam

[Bamboomancer]

I could elaborate... but I don't want to. This is more of a "Hey town, trust me" kinda deal.

[mathcam]

So...you're claiming cop? I'm not scum, so consider your sanity.

Cam

[Bamboomancer]

Ah screw it.

I'm a cop. I knew who the other cop was because I didn't like him. I couldn't vote onto his target.

I don't know my sanity. But I got guilty on mathcam and innocent on someone else. So I'm leaving it up to town to decide.

[mathcam]

Well, there's no sense in keeping the "innocent" secret. If you lynch me and get killed overnight, the knowledge of who's scum would die with you.

Cam

[BrianMcQueso]

Brian was the first to vote dodgy, but his vote stayed on him the whole time until the end of the lynch. One is led to believe that he may have been trying to pressure him without seeming to participate in the lynch? He posted quite a bit, and doesn't really comment on the wagon at all...

Well, ever since I voted Dodgy, he hadn't done anything to redeem himself in my eyes. I originally put the vote to stir discussion, and his reaction to that made me perfectly happy to keep my vote on him. I didn't bring it up any more because I didn't feel the need to 'beat a dead horse'. If I had said over and over that I think he's scum, I'd look way too eager to lynch him, and it wasn't

that

important to me.

And our cop should definitely reveal his innocent, as one way or another we'll nab a scum out of this (unless you're a random cop, which really shouldn't belong anywhere. If you're random, two consecutive town lynches would damage our chances too much).

P.S. Huge laughs at Lauritz for trying to convict the dead man. It was so convincing that you make me want to lynch his corpse.

[Bamboomancer]

Alright Mathcam, fine.

Lauritz Melchior or Mathcam is scum.

Mathcam was guilty, Lauritz is innocent based on my PM's.

I don't know what kind of cop I am, I could very well be insane because i'm retired. I was convinced I was paranoid after N1. I think Mathcam is a more dangerous scum than Lauritz, which is why I'm pressing his lynch more than my insane lynch.

[Lauritz Melchior]

Who did you search night one that made you think that you were paranoid? I'm a bit confused. I don't think that you're scum. We had a police chief, so there would be a cop under him, and if you're not that cop, then you'd be searched by that cop during this night. I think that you're who you say you are. You already tried to role-claim as a cop on day two when you were scum, and it wouldn't work in this situation. I guess we could try to test your sanity, but I still think that Mathcam is innocent.

[Someone]

unvote, Vote:mathcam

It sounds like he searched Mathcam N1, but thought mathcam was innocent, and that he was paranoid.

Logic for the vote is simple: Either mathcam or lauritz is scum. I found mathcam scummier than lauritz, hence the vote. If we have a vig, he/she should vig either lauritz depending on the alignment of mathcam. If any of you two(mathcam/LM) have roles that have any chance to look guilty while you're actually innocent, you should come out now.

[big_kahunia]

Hm.. interesting, it looks like Cam or LM is guilty. I believe Bamboom is cop since he voted Cam on day 1 and was persistent. I need to reread the game to see which one I’ll vote for. Cam is a tough read and I don’t have much (read any) experience playing against/with LM. With the “retired” cop thing, I’d lean towards you being insane, but I’m not sure. As I mentioned earlier, I’ll reread before casting my vote.

>>>>
Here is something interesting I found:

He opens the door and steps out. He pulls out a switch blade from his pocket and swiftly knifes the Chief of Police in the stomach.
"Chief of Police, eh? You're not gonna be sharing your results with anyone but me..."
The man takes his bag, and returns to his limo.

I might be reaching here, but could the SK (this is clearly an sk kill, knife and the other kill mentions possibly more than one) have Quailman’s results. The killer didn’t step out of the car w/ the bag, only the blade in his pocket. In the last sentence, both bag and car have the possessive “his”. We know the car is the killer’s, but the bag isn’t specified. This could be totally nothing, but it’s food for thought.

[Lauritz Melchior]

The thing that gets me is that I think that Mathcam is innocent. Assuming that he is, that would either make Panda insane or random. I doubt the random (though apparently Dranko likes to give his players a hard time), so I suspect that he insane. However, that makes me guilty, which doesn't make sense to me. I don't think that my role would make me appear as guilty. However, I'm willing to test his sanity on Mathcam (I still think that he's innocent though. So I'd rather go for another target). Still, it could well be that Mathcam is scum.

Does anybody have any other ideas for targets?

[Someone]

What makes you so sure that mathcam is innocent?

[Lauritz Melchior]

I'm not. It's just the way that he was so reluctant to vote for Dodgy, though he did vote for him in the end. Even when there were three people on him, he dismissed the Dodgy bandwagon as a waste. It wasn't until arguing with Dodgy that he finally voted for him. I'm not saying that this proves him innocent, but I'm pretty sure that he is innocent.

[Bamboomancer]

Yes, my N1 search WAS mathcam, and there was a good reason for that. Since I want you guys to believe me more, and just not freaking doubt everything I say...

I AM STEPHANIE'S FATHER

And I WILL get the bitch that killed my poor girl... such a bright young medical student.

[BrianMcQueso]

A thought: as an investigative mason, is it possible that Bamboo suffered a 50% accuracy penalty when losing a mason partner? Still, that would leave his N1 investigation still 100% accurate... which means that Mathcam is guilty... which means it's less likely that there's a 50% accuracy screw-up...

I confuse myself. But the signs do point to Mathcam, and his behavior has been scummier than Lauritz's. I need to think more before voting, though.

[Someone]

Well, that gets rid of the "bamboomancer is playing the lepton's on us" theory.

[Lauritz Melchior]

I guess we can find out more about Panda's condition by seeing who Mathcam is.
I will

vote: mathcam

, however, if anybody has a better target, I'd rather go after them, as I still think that mathcam is innocent.

[mathcam]

Brian, where does it say that Stephanie's father was Stephanie's co-mason? Bamboo, is that true?

I admit to being perplexed by Lauritz's stance on myself, but I'm pretty sure

Vote: Lauritz Melchior

is the correct play for me here. Maybe those of you who keep referring to how I've acted scummy could elaborate? I know it doesn't mean much coming from the accused himself, but I think that the argument that I'm not scummy because I was so relucant to vote for Dodgy has some merit.

Cam

[Stewie]

vote count? I'm planning on voting mathcam, mainly because the cop that found him guilty already had another weakness, and it seems unlikely to me that he would have two weaknesses.

[Dranko20]

Here a

let's make Stewie feel special by doing what he wants, cause i'm his bitch Vote Count!

3 Mathcam (bamboomancer, someone, Lauritz Melchior)
1 Lauritz Melchior (mathcam)

5 to lynch!

[rajrhcpfreak]

well seeing that the cop found him guilty i have to

vote: mathcam

, but then when the cop lost his partner i think that he did lose his accuracy or maybe all of it because the police cheif was killed. that make me think that Lauritz Melchior is the other scum not to mention they way he made his first post... and then he tried to defend mathcam.

[rajrhcpfreak]

wait i just saw the vote count... ill wait until he gets to claim.

unvote: mathcam

[mathcam]

I'm a tweaked doctor. Without going too much into the specifics of how my role is tweaked, let me at least say that I'm allowed to protect myself. So I can prove my role if have a vig left, by not ending up dead in the morning.

Cam

[rajrhcpfreak]

well he could ahve the role of an SK+ and has a one night immunity. i would like to hear some coments from the rest of the town before i place my vote, but im leaning on mathcam being scum.

if hes SK then Lauritz Melchior may not be scum being that she chouldnt be saving him because the SK is alone...

[Lauritz Melchior]

I have no relation to mathcam. I doubt Panda's accuracy because Mathcam seems to be innocent based on his interaction with Dodgy.