Very nice.
Anyways, despite of the obvious errors in his post, LM has a good number of very valid points.
Now, using LM's list, if we take away our dead innocents, we get Brian McQueso, rajrhcpfreak, Lauritz Melchior and Mathcam.
Out of the four, I find Brian and Mathcam to be the most suspicious. Therefore, I will
vote:brian, FOS:mathcam
Brian was the first to vote dodgy, but his vote stayed on him the whole time until the end of the lynch. One is led to believe that he may have been trying to pressure him without seeming to participate in the lynch? He posted quite a bit, and doesn't really comment on the wagon at all...
Mathcam was the principal force in the dodgy lynch, and now must pay the price for it
. Is he's scum trying to get a townee lynched? Although I didn't agree with all of his points, it is important to note that scum probably wouldn't be that vocal...
Of course, then it becomes WIFOM because if being vocal proves you innocent then all scum would be vocal.
Just some food for thought.
All in all, there is probably a disproportionate number of scum on the dodgy list, it's just up to us to find em.
Now rajrhcpfreak lurked for a lot of day one, but otherwise did nothing of suspicious. I'm keeping an eye on him, but there's nothing incriminating at this point.
LM was the fourth on the wagon, which is usually more suspicious. However, his vote seems like a genuine gut feeling, and given the way dodgy plays, it is very plausible that he was interpreting dodgy's weird play-style as scumminess.
This is just here so my posts don't look so ugly when I edit them.