The normal story: a little town in Italy has been peaceful for thousands of years, until one family gets greedy. Then part of that family splits off. Then things get ugly. The town decides to take care of it by killing one person a day until all the murderers are gone.
* sets up PortaBar(TM) under licence from the dogpack*
Get your Pluto 8 here! A near-lethal mix of absynthe, cognac, grandmarnier, cointreau, calvados, dom benedictine, marc de bourgogne and for patriotic reasons a liberal measure of Dutch Jenever!
* takes free hot dog from Sooth and hands him a Pluto 8 for free *
Jalyn walks through the town square after making her kill, her gun concealed, counting out the loot to divide it into even portions. Therefore when the dark shape jumped into the road in front of her, it took her an extra second to get her gun. That extra second made all the difference, as a gold-plated bullet pierced her skin.
Jalyn, Bringleone Godfather, has been killed by the Alringleone Family.
That is the only death.
It is day 1, 5 votes to lynch, two lynches allowed.
Well I personally think Jesternls "huh" post shows one of two things hes/shes either a very cunning mafia who is faking the "huh" or he/she as it appears was trying to suss out what happened....
Two mafia families in a town this small does not give us good odds, but if they kill each other
Jesternl's post isn't much to go on, though. A single post, this early in the game, means nothing. You could interpret his post to assume that he is any of the roles that one could think of (either mafia family, townie, the doctor, etc.). Not enough to warrent anything more than a FOS, but even that is shakey. Then again, this
Jesternl's post isn't much to go on, though. A single post, this early in the game, means nothing. You could interpret his post to assume that he is any of the roles that one could think of (either mafia family, townie, the doctor, etc.). Not enough to warrent anything more than a FOS, but even that is shakey. Then again, this is the first round..
But, there's no vote from me, yet, either.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).