Open 261: VasudeVa's Vengeful Villa (Town Win)
-
-
VasudeVa Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2715
- Joined: February 24, 2010
Open 261: VasudeVa's Vengeful Villa (Town Win)
Open 261 - Vengeful
Vitals still viable:
MagnaofIllusion
andrew94
jmj3000
charter
Bolded are confirmed
Vapid Victims:
FarCry lynched D1. He was theMafia Godfather.Last edited by VasudeVa on Tue Oct 26, 2010 11:45 pm, edited 10 times in total.Call me Vas, ;D A little less active than I used to be due to IRL. Hoping to be back up to speed soon-ish!-
-
VasudeVa Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2715
- Joined: February 24, 2010
-
-
VasudeVa Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2715
- Joined: February 24, 2010
-
-
VasudeVa Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2715
- Joined: February 24, 2010
-
-
andrew94 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4045
- Joined: May 5, 2010
- Location: dota room
-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
VOTE: andrew94 for using a FOS instead of actually voting.
I'd like to bring a few points for discussion to the table -
1. Despite this being a Vengeful let's try not to rush through at Mach speed, shall we? My last Vengeful (234) was very quick and didn't end well as a consequence.
2. If any of you are not familar enough with Vengefuls keep this in mind - any lynch on a Town must have at least one Scum on the wagon. I know it seems obvious but I've had people ask for claims in these games before so it is worth putting out there."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
charter Beware of Dog
- Beware of Dog
- Beware of Dog
- Posts: 9261
- Joined: July 12, 2007
- Location: Virginia
If scum get caught, they get lynched. No need to pussyfoot around just because they may have been caught on page three.
Andrew, have you played in a vengeful before?
Right now I'm pretty suspicious of Magna because his discussion points are actually just a bunch of muck that town is going to have to swim through (I realize that I fueled this a little bit, but I feel quite strongly his 1 is wrong). Not voting at this time, however.-
-
charter Beware of Dog
- Beware of Dog
- Beware of Dog
- Posts: 9261
- Joined: July 12, 2007
- Location: Virginia
-
-
andrew94 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4045
- Joined: May 5, 2010
- Location: dota room
-
-
Far_Cry Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 629
- Joined: June 15, 2009
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Hmmm. So we already have some serious discussion. That's what I like about a setup like vengeful.
1. So you're saying we should play things nice and slow. But your vote seems to contradict that IMO. Anyways, what exactly makes this game different from others? I mean, why are we supposed to "not rush it" and play slowly in vengeful? I think the same advice goes for any other game. Therefore, this is somewhat of a nothing statement to me.MagnaofIllusion wrote:VOTE: andrew94 for using a FOS instead of actually voting.
I'd like to bring a few points for discussion to the table -
1. Despite this being a Vengeful let's try not to rush through at Mach speed, shall we? My last Vengeful (234) was very quick and didn't end well as a consequence.
2. If any of you are not familar enough with Vengefuls keep this in mind - any lynch on a Town must have at least one Scum on the wagon. I know it seems obvious but I've had people ask for claims in these games before so it is worth putting out there.
2. This too, is quite a "duh" statement. Look, I see with this statement (and the last) that you are trying to avoid any sort of problems and/or mistakes. But how is this bringing discussion to the table, as you said? I don't see anything beneficial in this post that will help further play, other than making you more suspicious. I'm not impressed.
What exactly do you mean by "muck to swim through?"charter wrote:Right now I'm pretty suspicious of Magna because his discussion points are actually just a bunch of muck that town is going to have to swim through (I realize that I fueled this a little bit, but I feel quite strongly his 1 is wrong). Not voting at this time, however.
Wait, what? There is only one vote on the table at this point. Your above scenario won't come into reality unless somebody gets a second vote. So I'm not getting what you are trying to say.andrew94 wrote:are you serious magna?
this is lylo, the scum can just quickhammerz and vs kills the hammerer and we go into day 2 with 3 p pl with NOTHING MANView my new PC gaming blog at: http://poorpcgamer.blogspot.com-
-
jmj3000 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1290
- Joined: December 3, 2009
- Location: Savannah, GA
Vengeful has 5 players, meaning 3 to lynch. MoI putting his vote down already is dangerous, as unless he is one of the scum, the scum can come in and throw down two votes to finish the day. However, if they do that, then they have painted themselves with a nice, bug, "VENGE KILL ME PLEASE!" target.
True about going slow and being methodical with your lynches should be the same in every game, but most other games have 2 or 3 mislynches before town is in danger of losing. In a vengeful, one mislynch can lose the game for town. Therefore, we have to be extra careful.Far_Cry wrote: 1. So you're saying we should play things nice and slow. But your vote seems to contradict that IMO. Anyways, what exactly makes this game different from others? I mean, why are we supposed to "not rush it" and play slowly in vengeful? I think the same advice goes for any other game. Therefore, this is somewhat of a nothing statement to me.Looking for experienced designers to help me design, a sequel to my Nintendo Mafia game!SONY MAFIA
-
-
Far_Cry Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 629
- Joined: June 15, 2009
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
I understand what you are saying, but MoI didn't state it this way, did he?jmj3000 wrote:
True about going slow and being methodical with your lynches should be the same in every game, but most other games have 2 or 3 mislynches before town is in danger of losing. In a vengeful, one mislynch can lose the game for town. Therefore, we have to be extra careful.Far_Cry wrote: 1. So you're saying we should play things nice and slow. But your vote seems to contradict that IMO. Anyways, what exactly makes this game different from others? I mean, why are we supposed to "not rush it" and play slowly in vengeful? I think the same advice goes for any other game. Therefore, this is somewhat of a nothing statement to me.View my new PC gaming blog at: http://poorpcgamer.blogspot.com-
-
andrew94 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4045
- Joined: May 5, 2010
- Location: dota room
-
-
Far_Cry Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 629
- Joined: June 15, 2009
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
What case are you talking about? If two scum quickly jump on a wagon they are obviously screwed. And I doubt any town player would jump on a wagon so soon without info.andrew94 wrote:err but even if the guy who got hammered was venge killed
the next day theres 3 ppl, with absolutely no discussionView my new PC gaming blog at: http://poorpcgamer.blogspot.com-
-
andrew94 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4045
- Joined: May 5, 2010
- Location: dota room
-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
I’m quite serious. Vengeful games are quite a different animal. Regardless of whether the situation is LYLO the ability of all Town players Day 1 to enact a Vengeful kill makes scum quicklynching to be a suicidal and stupid play.Andrew wrote:are you serious magna?
this is lylo, the scum can just quickhammerz and vs kills the hammerer and we go into day 2 with 3 p pl with NOTHING MAN
Your reaction that borders on fear mongering isn’t the reaction I’d expect from Town. Your posts at 12 and 14 are continuations of that fear mongering. You are asserting a very unlikely scenario.
1. My statement was a warning against running through Day 1 and 2 in less than 10 hours. There is no harm in having a Day 1 that lasts long enough for people to make a reasonable assessment of relationships based on voting.FarCry wrote:1. So you're saying we should play things nice and slow.But your vote seems to contradict that IMO.Anyways, what exactly makes this game different from others? I mean, why are we supposed to "not rush it" and play slowly in vengeful? I think the same advice goes for any other game. Therefore, this is somewhat of a nothing statement to me.
The bolded portion is incorrect. Laying down a vote in no way means I am attempting to rush the Day. It is the first real vote on someone and is providing good reactions by which to judge alignments.
So you are saying that a first vote is dangerous because of the chance of a quick-lynch by scum but then saying that said quick-lynch would result in scum basically outing themselves.jmj30000 wrote:Vengeful has 5 players, meaning 3 to lynch. MoI putting his vote down already is dangerous, as unless he is one of the scum, the scum can come in and throw down two votes to finish the day. However, if they do that, then they have painted themselves with a nice, bug, "VENGE KILL ME PLEASE!" target.
Under the scenario my vote can’t be dangerous to Town if it results in both scum outing themselves."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
andrew94 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4045
- Joined: May 5, 2010
- Location: dota room
-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
Let’s revisit your first statement –Andrew wrote:we have no idea if 1st or 2nd person on wagon is scum
Fact – there is a single vote in the game right now. My vote for you.Andrew wrote:this is lylo, the scum can just quickhammerz and vs kills the hammerer and we go into day 2 with 3 p pl with NOTHING MAN
For scum to ‘just quickhammerz’ they would have to both add a vote to you.
Otherwise your scenario would require a Town player to place a second vote for scum to quickhammerz. But your initial post doesn’t indicate that scum “can quickhammerz” after a second vote is placed. One vote appears and you cry "Quick Lynch, quick lynch".
In summary your follow-up statement doesn’t connect with your initial stament.
But please answer the following question –
Why are you so worried about a quicklynch when everyone else in the game has posted and not a single other vote has been cast?"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.-
-
Far_Cry Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 629
- Joined: June 15, 2009
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
I'm null on Andrew at this point with his faulty ideas (in fact, ideas that make just about no sense.) But I would like him to answer MoI's question.
Well, I see what you're saying about not running the game so quickly. But that applies for virtually every single game. And as for that second sentence (about it not being harmful in having a long Day 1): why are you saying this? I never proposed doing the opposite of what you suggested and rushing the game. So this once again, is a statement that means nothing.MagnaofIllusion wrote:
1. My statement was a warning against running through Day 1 and 2 in less than 10 hours. There is no harm in having a Day 1 that lasts long enough for people to make a reasonable assessment of relationships based on voting.FarCry wrote:1. So you're saying we should play things nice and slow.But your vote seems to contradict that IMO.Anyways, what exactly makes this game different from others? I mean, why are we supposed to "not rush it" and play slowly in vengeful? I think the same advice goes for any other game. Therefore, this is somewhat of a nothing statement to me.
The bolded portion is incorrect. Laying down a vote in no way means I am attempting to rush the Day. It is the first real vote on someone and is providing good reactions by which to judge alignments.
As for your second point, why do you call it a "real vote?" You voted andrew because he used an FoS instead of a vote, but you failed to back this up in any way. Thus I assumed your vote was random.View my new PC gaming blog at: http://poorpcgamer.blogspot.com-
-
andrew94 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4045
- Joined: May 5, 2010
- Location: dota room
-
-
Far_Cry Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 629
- Joined: June 15, 2009
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona
The question came from MoI:andrew94 wrote:u want me to answer what question? i see no question in that quote u provided
Answer it please.MagnaofIllusion wrote:Why are you so worried about a quicklynch when everyone else in the game has posted and not a single other vote has been cast?View my new PC gaming blog at: http://poorpcgamer.blogspot.com-
-
charter Beware of Dog
- Beware of Dog
- Beware of Dog
- Posts: 9261
- Joined: July 12, 2007
- Location: Virginia
Vote Far Cry
About 95% sure he's scum with the extreme passiveness in his posting so far. Pretty sure he's commented on everyone so far, but has avoided actually saying anything about everyone. Doing an inordinate amount of active lurking. I find it impossible to believe he's town and posted as much as he has and hasn't formed an opinion on anyone.
Amazingly, I find Andrew's hyperparanoia about being quickhammered null right now. On the one hand, he might freak out if he's the GF, on the other, he could be town who has his panties in a bunch. There isn't much pointing in one direction or another, but my gut says he's slightly town, since being at L-2 when you need all three townies to vote you if you're the GF isn't much of a reason to freak.
I'm also finding jmj suspicious, as his post said a bunch of nothing everyone didn't already know AND agreed with something Farcryscum said.
Magna, I question if you know anything about vengefuls. You say scum quickhammering would be suicidal, when scum quickhammering early in a game in just about any game (especially page one in vengefuls) is good play. Like 1000 times better strategy if the GF can get vengekilled and the goon has done even the slightest distancing. It would be unwinnable for town if goon was voting the GF, and GF quickhammered.
All this said, Magna is slightly scummy, mostly null to me right now. I disagree with a lot of what he's saying, but I feel that he believes what he's saying, and isn't trying to pull one over on us. Whether or not he believes that as scum or town, I'm not sure. But what I am sure on is Far Cry being scum.
Magna and Andrew, your read on Far Cry right now?
preview edit. His last post cements it. My vote is only going to move if I can determine the scumteam and who the GF is. At this point, not sure, but I am sure FarCry is scum.-
-
andrew94 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4045
- Joined: May 5, 2010
- Location: dota room
quicklynch of a townie = the hammerer getting killed
but the hammerer can say 'o i ddint realise L1' he might not be vengekilled...
so mafia can win
if he gets vengekilled
its wifom on the 2nd person OR THE 1ST PERSON.
with little or no info.
@charter. scum doesnt lose if gf dies to vengekilli hate walls, i will only skim walls.-
-
charter Beware of Dog
- Beware of Dog
- Beware of Dog
- Posts: 9261
- Joined: July 12, 2007
- Location: Virginia
-
-
MagnaofIllusion has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- has been killed Night 1
- Posts: 13964
- Joined: February 9, 2010
- Location: Assimilating the world ...
If are suggesting that either –FarCry wrote:Well, I see what you're saying about not running the game so quickly. But that applies for virtually every single game.
1. MS games have a history of rushing Day 1.
2. or the Vengeful games are not significantly different enough to warrant the clarification
then I disagree with you completely.
It’s a real vote for the reasons I stated – FOS in a Vengeful game is pointless. Vengefuls don’t run like regular Mafia games with a cute little RVS period. Do these questions actually make you think I am scum?FarCry wrote:As for your second point, why do you call it a "real vote?" You voted andrew because he used an FoS instead of a vote, but you failed to back this up in any way. Thus I assumed your vote was random.
Looking at FarCry in ISO (which is sort of comical since we don’t even have 1 page yet) –Charter wrote:Magna and Andrew, your read on Far Cry right now?
0 – Lots of questions to three different players. Offers up the opinion that my questions are ‘duh’ statements.
1 – Fluff response to JMJ
2 – Asks Andrew about his quick-hammer thoughts.
3 – States he is null on Andrew. More questions related to my vote and initial questions.
4 – Directs Andrew to answer a question from me.
The only real assertion that even closely resembles an opinion is his suggestion that Andrew is Null. His interactions are weakest with Jmj.
He certainly may be scum but looking at Andrew and JMJ I’m not solidly convinced.
I don’t share your null leaning Town opinion on Andrew simply because his entire ISO is filled with the following
ISO 0 – FOS
Remaining ISOs – AHHH quicklynch alert AHHH.
Not anything remotely looking like questioning there and nothing in the way of an opinion on anyone’s alignment.
Jmj has exactly one post and it is filled mostly with set-up jargon.
@Charter– If FarCry is scum, who do you think is likely to be his Partner?
@FarCry, Andrew, and JMJ– All three of you have 24 hours to make a post that takes a stand on who your most likely scum candidates are."I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.