Mini 1070 The Godfather:Hunt for Sollozzo (GAME!)

[Andrius]

Votecount 1.1

"I'm going to make him an offer he can't refuse." - Vito Corleone

RedCoyote (1): StrangerCoug
StrangerCoug (1): bv310
bv310 (1): pacman281292
Wingless (1): Far_Cry
pacman281292 (1): Thor665


Not Voting (7): Exilon, Wingless, Zajnet, RedCoyote, FakeGod, Katsuki, Bub Bidderskins

With 12 alive it takes 7 to gun someone down.
Deadline is set at October 31st, at 5:00pm PST.
Mafia 24-hour DayTalk ends at October 11th, 5:00pm PST.

[FakeGod]

......and there is no highest bandwagon.

@Far_cry: Inconsistencies = mafia. Mafia must be more flexible and willing to change stances in order to stay alive and "appealing" to the rest of the town, therefore mafia are more likely to make inconsistent statements.

Vote: pacman281292

but,

@Zajnet: what's wrong with bandwagons?

[Katsuki]

@Zaj: I once confirmed on pg8 of a game... and that was only like a few hrs into the game too.

Null on early part of pacman/thor. Did not read thor's latest giant post yet.

Vote:Andrius

I'm not counting that vote, for the record. - Andy

[RedCoyote]

I got an idea, let's gang up on the guy who's trying to bring us out of RVS.

Vote: Thor665

---

The Mod mentioned the video game. I've played it, but I wouldn't want that to influence this game. It was so-so. It felt like a poorly made GTA clone. I don't remember it very well; I just remember it being kind of glitchy and repetitive.

[Wingless]

I got an idea, let's gang up on the guy who's trying to bring us out of RVS.

Vote: Thor665

Why wouldn't we go out of RVS?

Vote: RedCoyote

I think pacman's wagon post was a bit strange.

[pacman281292]

@Thor: Your logic at post 44 is still circular. And fake.
My reason "for bandwagoning" was indeed a joke. Sorry if you misunderstood I guess
*facepalm*
@Far_Cry: Thanks for the info I guess
@Andrius: Why do you have need to bump the thread? The last post had been 5 minutes ago!
@FakeGod: Again, my reason "for bandwagoning" was intended to be a joke.
@Katsuki: Two words. Alphabet Mafia.
@RedCoyote: I don't know what to feel about that vote. It was at least strange (altough Thor did indeed overreact enormously, but /meh).
Heh. Second game where everyone (well, almost everyone) overreacts to something I say on RVS, totally intended to be a joke.
(Can't mention the other one; ongoing game)

[pacman281292]

EBWOP: At RC's part, the strange vote is RC's vote.

[Exilon]

OH HAI GAIZ.
I don't know if I can handle THREE games, but we'll see. Possibly not, but it's Andrius <3.

VOTE: Thor

He's scum with Farcry

. Discuss.
Btw, Andrius, if blue is anyone's color, feel free to change this^to navy. Kthx.

Also

/confirm

My role will never get me nightkilled unless I play extremely pro-town.
^

look out it's a trap-

No, you can use blue. I've only got red and black (and purple). -Andy

[Wingless]

VOTE: Thor

He's scum with Farcry

. Discuss.
Btw, Andrius, if blue is anyone's color, feel free to change this^to navy. Kthx.

Also

/confirm

My role will never get me nightkilled unless I play extremely pro-town.
^

look out it's a trap-

No, you can use blue. I've only got red and black (and purple). -Andy

Why is Thor scum? And why is Farcry? You could posts the reasons too.

[Katsuki]

Oh hey guys, mafia get daytalk until 5pm PST. Let's stop posting until then shall we?

[Far_Cry]

VOTE: Thor

He's scum with Farcry

. Discuss.

I would appreciate it if you could tell us why this is so.

Heh. Second game where everyone (well, almost everyone) overreacts to something I say on RVS, totally intended to be a joke. (Can't mention the other one; ongoing game)

I don't think everyone, not even almost everyone, overreacted to your vote. Thor was the only person who really "overreacted."

[Far_Cry]

Oops, forgot some two things:

@Far_cry: Inconsistencies = mafia. Mafia must be more flexible and willing to change stances in order to stay alive and "appealing" to the rest of the town, therefore mafia are more likely to make inconsistent statements.

Vote: pacman281292

Who are you directing this towards? Who's being inconsistant? Pacman, or me?

And happy scumday Thor. You are soon to become a full-grown puppy.

[Bub Bidderskins]

Hello again.

I think that Pacman was making a joke. He made a random vote. Then bv posted and voted for strangercoug for being the back-up mod to his game. Pacman then unvotes and votes for bv in the very next post for being the mod of the same game. It just comes off more as funny than as a scum-tell to me.

I think that thor was either over-reacting, or just trying to find a way to get out of RVS.

I also agree with Wingless that Exilon needs to exlain his reasons for suspecting Thor and Farcry before we can discuss.

[StrangerCoug]

Unvote: RedCoyote
Vote: pacman281292

His explanation screams "this is a random vote, please pay no attention to it'

But he unvoted a random vote in order to make it.
That suggests that the second vote isn't really random.
But his answer suggests he wants me to believe it is.
He wants me to believe something that isn't true.
Wagon of win, welcome to the game.

The hell, Thor665? Does this make sense?
UNVOTE: RedCoyote
VOTE: Thor665

[Exilon]

The thing with 'DISCUSS' is that you try and find out why I said so. You're awful.
Also, you should be saying ' I do not agree' or 'I agree.'.

So why are you asking me why instead of stating what you think? GOT SOMETHING TO HIDE HUH
Good, we're making progress.~

[Thor665]

The hell, StrangerCoug? Yes it does.

What do you see as the scum angle in my reasoning and vote?

Pretty much my other thoughts have been covered by other posters, but I'm seconding question by Wingless and agreeing with Pacman that Far_Cry managed to post a lot and provide very little.

I'm fascinated (as usual) by people thinking I'm "over-reacting" to things simply because I'm willing to point out what I feel is the most scummy action in two pages. I didn't over-react to anything, but with only 2 pages of info the threshold of what one finds scummy is lower (fascinating how someone voting someone else for being a mod somewhere isn't an over-reaction. I'm pretty sure my scumtell is more valid then that one, and indeed most of the reasons used for voting thus far.)

EBWOP: @Exilon - so lack of saying agree/disagree is a tell on everyone that posted between your first and second posts? Don't really see the progress.

$5 says Exilon's reasoning is that Far_Cry acted friendly to me in his first post - a massive buddy tell indeed. Don't see much value in hunting for buddy tells at this stage, but then I'm terrible with buddy tells.

[Exilon]

People have various ways to scumhunt and in early stages of the game, scumhunting is specially volatile. One of my favorite methods are crap-traps, and they often work to a good extent. :3

[StrangerCoug]

The hell, StrangerCoug? Yes it does.

What do you see as the scum angle in my reasoning and vote?

You are calling a second random vote scummy; in my book it is actually null. Also, if we want to be technical, there are no truly random votes unless people decide to use random.org to make them. There will probably be something scummier, but I'm trying to get info out of you right now.

[FakeGod]

Oops, forgot some two things:

@Far_cry: Inconsistencies = mafia. Mafia must be more flexible and willing to change stances in order to stay alive and "appealing" to the rest of the town, therefore mafia are more likely to make inconsistent statements.

Vote: pacman281292

Who are you directing this towards? Who's being inconsistant? Pacman, or me?

And happy scumday Thor. You are soon to become a full-grown puppy.

Pacman is being inconsistent.

[Thor665]

@StrangerCoug - I'm not calling a second random vote scummy at all. Why do you think I'm doing that?

I'm calling him claiming it as a second random vote when clearly there were choices and decisions made that he didn't account for as scummy.

@Exilon - I'm not denying you your methods, I'm saying I don't see the value added currently. Who are you applying your "GOT SOMETHING TO HIDE HUH" tell to? Who do you think ducked the question and why do you think that shows them having knowledge beyond what a town player would have?

[pacman281292]

The hell, StrangerCoug? Yes it does.

What do you see as the scum angle in my reasoning and vote?

Pretty much my other thoughts have been covered by other posters, but I'm seconding question by Wingless and agreeing with Pacman that Far_Cry managed to post a lot and provide very little.

I never said Far_Cry "managet to post a lot and provided very little". Wingless "questions" are "Why is Thor scum? Why is Far_Cry scum?" as reply to an (IMO) random statement. BS.

I'm fascinated (as usual) by people thinking I'm "over-reacting" to things simply because I'm willing to point out what I feel is the most scummy action in two pages. I didn't over-react to anything, but with only 2 pages of info the threshold of what one finds scummy is lower (fascinating how someone voting someone else for being a mod somewhere isn't an over-reaction. I'm pretty sure my scumtell is more valid then that one, and indeed most of the reasons used for voting thus far.)

WHAT?
*head asplodes*
Your vote is indeed an overreaction to a joke directed to the moderator of one of the games I'll soon play at. How the hell is it "a serious reason"?
*head asplodes again.

EBWOP: @Exilon - so lack of saying agree/disagree is a tell on everyone that posted between your first and second posts? Don't really see the progress.

$5 says Exilon's reasoning is that Far_Cry acted friendly to me in his first post - a massive buddy tell indeed. Don't see much value in hunting for buddy tells at this stage, but then I'm terrible with buddy tells.

Lazy. However, Exilon's post might have a point. Gotta recheck that.

Oops, forgot some two things:

The thing with 'DISCUSS' is that you try and find out why I said so. You're awful.
Also, you should be saying ' I do not agree' or 'I agree.'.

So why are you asking me why instead of stating what you think? GOT SOMETHING TO HIDE HUH
Good, we're making progress.~

I have no idea of Far-Thor. Only things that have happened so far are RVS, then Thor spoiling it. However, I'm going to recheck this.

@Far_cry: Inconsistencies = mafia. Mafia must be more flexible and willing to change stances in order to stay alive and "appealing" to the rest of the town, therefore mafia are more likely to make inconsistent statements.

Vote: pacman281292

Who are you directing this towards? Who's being inconsistant? Pacman, or me?

And happy scumday Thor. You are soon to become a full-grown puppy.

Pacman is being inconsistent.

Where have I been inconsistent?
As of that post, all what I had done was "conform", "RandomVote StrangerCoug", then "Unvote Randomvote bv". I don't see how have I been inconsistent.

@StrangerCoug - I'm not calling a second random vote scummy at all. Why do you think I'm doing that?

I'm calling him claiming it as a second random vote when clearly there were choices and decisions made that he didn't account for as scummy

This reasoning made me laugh.
"Choices and decisions made that I didn't account for". Sure, man. The "Choices and decisions made that I didn't account for" were other people's random votes. I don't get how that might have made my second random vote invalid without invalidating all other random votes, thus failing to answer the adressed question properly. Thus, your logic fails.
I'm starting to dislike this guy...

[pacman281292]

EBWOP: I don't know how did that Exilon post end up inside the FakeGod quote.

The thing with 'DISCUSS' is that you try and find out why I said so. You're awful.
Also, you should be saying ' I do not agree' or 'I agree.'.

So why are you asking me why instead of stating what you think? GOT SOMETHING TO HIDE HUH
Good, we're making progress.~

I have no idea of Far-Thor. Only things that have happened so far are RVS, then Thor spoiling it. However, I'm going to recheck this.

The aforequoted bit should be outside of the quote. It's unrelated.

[StrangerCoug]

@StrangerCoug - I'm not calling a second random vote scummy at all. Why do you think I'm doing that?

I'm calling him claiming it as a second random vote when clearly there were choices and decisions made that he didn't account for as scummy.

The "choices and decisions made that he didn't account for" aren't clear to me. If your case on him is trying to prolong the RVS, then I see your point, but I don't think we're on the same page here.

[Katsuki]

Oh hey guys, mafia get daytalk until 5pm PST. Let's stop posting until then shall we?

lol thanks for listening guys.

Well, now that that's past. Will look at thread tonight.

[Thor665]

I never said Far_Cry "managet to post a lot and provided very little". Wingless "questions" are "Why is Thor scum? Why is Far_Cry scum?" as reply to an (IMO) random statement. BS.

I thought your response to Far_Cry was an indictment of his vague and not pointed posts. If not, feel free to tell me what your meant. I'll stand by my opinion towards his posts though.
I did second the Wingless questions...I...don't know what point you're trying to make otherwise though.

WHAT?
*head asplodes*
Your vote is indeed an overreaction to a joke directed to the moderator of one of the games I'll soon play at. How the hell is it "a serious reason"?
*head asplodes again.

I am not shocked that your head asplodes as regards my case on you. I've yet to see anyone buy into the case on them Day 1.
I still don't find your constant need to restate just how random your vote is as convincing to me.

Lazy. However, Exilon's post might have a point. Gotta recheck that.

What does me being lazy have to do with anything?
Oh, this is mudslinging - never mind.

This reasoning made me laugh.
"Choices and decisions made that I didn't account for". Sure, man. The "Choices and decisions made that I didn't account for" were other people's random votes. I don't get how that might have made my second random vote invalid without invalidating all other random votes, thus failing to answer the adressed question properly. Thus, your logic fails.
I'm starting to dislike this guy...

I did address the question properly - he asked me if it made sense and I said 'yes'. You can *disagree* with that but implying that I dodged a question is simply more mudslinging.
I'm sorry that you now dislike me, you can still have some of my scumday cake, however.