-The "I've been at work and not mafiascum" catchup post-
Note: All comments are made as if that post was the current post. I didn't talk about anything after said post, or reference future activities.
First on the list: Fishy 64 - Fair enough. But that doesn't change the fact that your original post (34 for reference) seemed to have a completely different intention on the "likely scum" that can be best described by the phrase "book 'em, chief". If that makes any sense. I still don't agree with the argument, for the record, nor do I like your outright agreement with Raivann regarding Berry's "attitude". At that point of discussion, only the smiles we're essentially discussed, and you already know my opinion on that. The "wagon" that popped up after the smiley issue seemed a bit opportunistic (not all from you, mostly not you) and you haven't really moved up or down my list after this point (although others may have, more to come!).
Budja 67 - Jumping on a vote for a popular target at the time without adding any useful information. You can probably figure out my distaste for this type of post from that.
Mallow 70 - Yeah...no he didn't.
Budja 71 - More expanding if we could. Not gut if we could. Thanks.
Jack 75 - Cool. What others? Why do you like hopping your vote around without adding a lot of information?
Mitsuru 77 - I like scummy reads as much as the next guy, but can I see something more than a seemingly simple bandwagon jump?
Jack 79 - This post irks me. If we're going to have a day one where a main talking point is how someone wants others to see them, this seems like a good post to point out.
Mallow 80 - Whenever you want to talk about the comment in question, you are free to do so. Seems like a possible case of defensiveness.
Jack 83 - Why do most of your posts seem to catch my eye? What makes Scoug's post/vote any more of a talking point than Mitsuru? "This gives me a scummy read" vs. "You blatantly lied, and then used it as a reason to vote against me". One of these posts/votes outweighs the other, in my opinion.
Berry 84 - I'm not sure if I'm really keen on this whole, secret tell business. Your last comment doesn't hold too much weight either.
Jack 90 - Welcome back again. Dodging a question with a question about a smiley? Come on, buddy. Secret scumtells? See Berry 84.
Budja 91 - I'm glad you could tell us you don't like it. Please tell us why. (Or what post for that matter. Scoug has posted plenty in this game).
Jack 94 - What part of saying scoug said something that he completely didn't isn't a blatant fabrication?
End of page 4 comment - The day started with Jack jumping on the mallow train, and ended in Jack (somewhat) defending mallow's comment. The very same comment Jack sited with his vote. That doesn't make sense. What gives, brah?
Llama 100 - Not actually a reply to this post, but it logically fits here. While I do not completely agree with Llama, I guess I generally do. Obviously my opinion has changed for certain parties after a few days, but I still cannot see Blackberry's post 20 as anything that can be seen from a game strategy view. I don't see it as trying to look town from any faction, and as many times as I read it, I cannot get any closer to seeing it as such.
Scoug 102 - Bingo.
Mallow 104 - Prozac is the mod, Porochaz. Once upon a time it was discovered that Porochaz can be re-arranged to spell out the phrase "Oh Prozac", and that's just what I call him now. (and prozac is an antidepressant if that was what you were referring to). Secondly, I have to also comment on your apparent vanishing once your name became a talking point. I would like to see more of a defending your comment approach from you. It bothers me that I haven't seen it.
Budja 105 - See most of my comments regarding your posts. You haven't been adding very much to a conversation at all, and you ask someone else for information. I want to know your thoughts in more detail.
Raivann 111 - I don't really buy any of your reasons for a Budja leaning town read.
-He knows you get lynched early and often: What does this have to do with any kind of read?
-He wouldn't agree with you: Says who? What's to say he's scum and agreeing with you to throw you off? This is a very weak reason.
-Genuineness: A very wishy-washy answer. He's barely posted enough to sound genuine, let alone nothing to be too sure of as is.
So, you've been relatively quiet lately, and this sort of content doesn't allow me to get a good raivann fix. I don't really care who you've played with before, and I don't plan on taking many comments regarding other games. Lets hear you talk about this game. The one I am currently posting in. Then you can comment on other games, but you have five pages worth of posts to pick out content from. Start there. (Further along the post) You know they we're jokes, but seem to bring them up anyway. I don't understand their place in the post.
Anon 114 - I'm glad you're here and posting and everything, but I personally was expecting bit more from you. The two posts you have quoted do not make me lean either way about Llama, nor do they seem to have much in common. So as far as it concerns my opinion of this game, your post includes two useless quotes and a vote. If you want to convey more information to the town, please do so. I'm sure we would all appreciate it.
Anon 116- Piss off Mr. "I want". You lurk for four pages and come back with a less than stellar post with a vote, seeming to think you're on to something, while the rest of us know nothing of what you're on about. I'm glad we can see your opinions on everyone, but I know coming from myself (someone who seems to disagree with most of your scumdar), I want to hear a detailed explanation of what you think of
everyone
. Do that, and maybe I'll do what command the town to do. Pull your weight.
Llama 119 - I have no qualms with this post outside of the obvious emotion vote on Jack. I do somewhat agree with the vote itself (not the reasoning, but the vote on Jack).
Prozac 121 - Top votecount man. Top. (But you have two not voting with only Jack in the column). I should owe you a beer for all these votecounts.
