Crazy wrote:
Seriously, your case seems well thought out, but you didn't explain any of that in Post 25. You just mentioned the prod request. Why is that?
After we've had a few people examine prod request, it seems that it was likely (more weasel words) an innocent, "Hey mod, let's get started asap" rather than, "I'm scum and I'm looking to present myself as an active and constructive member of the game within the first two hours to establish a good foundation to hide under."
Agree or disagree?
I'd like to hear everyone's opinion on this.
Crazy wrote:
I believe using the word "odd" is scummy.
I think you are applying this idea too universally. Particularly in the context we're dealing with. It is like you are saying that I need outright say that the prod request (coupled with the other short posts Shattered had on pg 1) was scummy. This isn't absolute. There is nothing on page one that I would call explicitly scummy. Period. By using less confident words I am expressing my thoughts on the issue more clearly.
I'll continue to use "weasel words" where I see fit. That said, I will take firm stances if I feel the situation calls for that.
Crazy wrote:
But from what you just said, you had a semi-solid case on SV that could easily describe him as "scummy"
I disagree. I don't think I could justly describe anything he has said (so far) as "scummy."
I think Dizzy would agree:
DizzyIzzyB13 wrote:No, not really. Getting a prod on everyone at this point is a good idea since it lets everyone know the game has started and stimulates early game discussion.
I still think that asking for a prod immediately after the game started could have been motivated by, "I'm scum and I'm looking to present myself as an active and constructive member of the game within the first two hours to establish a good foundation to hide under."
But he could just be pumped about playing a game of mafia, right?
It isn't concrete. It could be viewed as peculiar, however.
Crazy wrote:you try to avoid any backlash by merely calling it "odd." But what's scummier is that you never posted your full case to begin with! To me, it's like you were stirring the pot but setting up someone else to take the fall.
As I said above, I don't feel like this is a solid case against Shattered. It is hardly a "case," if you'd even call it one. Again, we're not even 3 pages into the game yet -- there isn't a whole lot for us to work with so speaking in absolutes seems a bit absurd.
Do you think that this is a "semi-solid, well thought out" case against Shattered? Does anyone?
If I felt that way I would have either FoS'd or voted. I'd expect you to do the same.
I didn't make any accusations in post 25 and asked what the town thought.
dRool89 wrote:
Does anyone see this as odd?
I didn't even insist it was odd to begin with! I did not inquire, "does anyone else see this as odd?