Mini 935 -- The Fountainhead (Completed)

[AlmasterGM]

Vote: RedCoyote

Better dead than Red.

[Zang]

What?

I... what?

There's a difference there. See, the comment was already made about "not reading the rules" and that is just silly enough that it COULD have been at least a quasi-serious rationale for the vote.

So, like I said: lets assume it was - would "not reading the rules" be a scumtell?

That was a whole lot of words missing the point of what I was asking.

Did... did I catch a live one?

it was meant to be a random vote

[Porkens]

I think that Zang's reply is either simply flippant or an actual over-reaction.

Please, Zang, answer the question.

Vote: Zang

[d3x]

it was meant to be a random vote

I think everyone knows that it was a random Vote.

I believe Spyrex is asking "Would not reading the rules be a Scumtell to you?" He's pretty clear on that, and I gotta say, your reactions is really weird.

[Zang]

it was meant to be a random vote

I think everyone knows that it was a random Vote.

I believe Spyrex is asking "Would not reading the rules be a Scumtell to you?" He's pretty clear on that, and I gotta say, your reactions is really weird.

ok, I was confused on what he was saying

but no, not reading the rules is not a scumtell. How can it be? It does not help the scum in any way.

[AlmasterGM]

My lie detector just started beeping like crazy.

[SpyreX]

What was confusing about what I was saying?

And we're almost to the point I'm dancing around - is "not reading the rules" a null action or actually, as silly as it may seem, a townish one?

[Zang]

My lie detector just started beeping like crazy.

Why?

What was confusing about what I was saying?

And we're almost to the point I'm dancing around - is "not reading the rules" a null action or actually, as silly as it may seem, a townish one

I thought you were talking about all the votes an just using mine as an example. And I think it would be a null action because I see nothing particulary scummy or townish about it.

[horrordude0215]

Vote: Zang

Because bandwagons are full of win!

[Porkens]

I thought you were talking about all the votes an just using mine as an example. And I think it would be a null action because I see nothing particulary scummy or townish about it.

Sorry, I'm not sure I'm getting this. Are you saying that you thought SpyreX was saying that none of the votes were random?

I'm not sure exactly what GM means, either, actually. Please explain your comment, GM.

[Zang]

I thought you were talking about all the votes an just using mine as an example. And I think it would be a null action because I see nothing particulary scummy or townish about it.

Sorry, I'm not sure I'm getting this. Are you saying that you thought SpyreX was saying that none of the votes were random?

I'm not sure exactly what GM means, either, actually. Please explain your comment, GM.

I didn't even know he was talking about the random votes not be random, I thought he thought that they were real.

[Porkens]

I didn't even know he was talking about the random votes not be random, I thought he thought that they were real.

Ok, I understand what you are saying so far. Now, just so I'm sure; Your primary objection to SpyreX's post and vote was that he used

your

vote as an example, instead of one of the others, is that right?

[Zang]

I didn't even know he was talking about the random votes not be random, I thought he thought that they were real.

Ok, I understand what you are saying so far. Now, just so I'm sure; Your primary objection to SpyreX's post and vote was that he used

your

vote as an example, instead of one of the others, is that right?

no, my objection is that I didn't think he made any sence.

[Porkens]

I didn't even know he was talking about the random votes not be random, I thought he thought that they were real.

Ok, I understand what you are saying so far. Now, just so I'm sure; Your primary objection to SpyreX's post and vote was that he used

your

vote as an example, instead of one of the others, is that right?

no, my objection is that I didn't think he made any sence.

I'm not following this. He must have made

some

sense, since you had a very pointed reaction (in which you asked him why he focused on your vote over the others). Can you be a little more specific?

You also said he contradicted himself. I still don't understand this; could you explain it?

Finally, I'm not sure I can believe you about being confused over which votes were in question, since you said "

it

was meant to be a random vote " before you said "I thought he was talking about all the votes." I think it's pretty clear you thought that Spy was challenging your vote, specifically.

[d3x]

Zang- How is what I wrote different from what SpyreX wrote? Why did you 'get it' when I wrote almost exactly what SpyreX wrote?

[d3x]

@horror- Do you have anything constructive to add to the discussion aside form your enjoyment of bandwagons?

[Porkens]

@horror- Do you have anything constructive to add to the discussion aside form your enjoyment of bandwagons?

Do you think GM is being constructive?

[SpyreX]

Ohh yes this is happening:

Unvote, Vote: Zang

If you were confused, why wasn't your response in any way shape or form a sign of confusion. Even "why are you calling out MY vote?"

P.S. answer Porkens via contradiction.

[Kthxbye]

Vote: Al GM

for having a lie detector and not sharing... /pout

[d3x]

Do you think GM is being constructive?

In the sense that he's stating an opinion on the issue at hand? Yes. Do I think he could be more constructive? Definitely.

[Zang]

I didn't even know he was talking about the random votes not be random, I thought he thought that they were real.

Ok, I understand what you are saying so far. Now, just so I'm sure; Your primary objection to SpyreX's post and vote was that he used

your

vote as an example, instead of one of the others, is that right?

no, my objection is that I didn't think he made any sence.

I'm not following this. He must have made

some

sense, since you had a very pointed reaction (in which you asked him why he focused on your vote over the others). Can you be a little more specific?

You also said he contradicted himself. I still don't understand this; could you explain it?

Finally, I'm not sure I can believe you about being confused over which votes were in question, since you said "

it

was meant to be a random vote " before you said "I thought he was talking about all the votes." I think it's pretty clear you thought that Spy was challenging your vote, specifically.

Look at this

Lets play pretend that these

votes

have some meaning.

votes, plural meaning more than one vote. I did say that it was a random vote but before that I said this-

There just random voted

I meant they're which is also plural.

And I only said that it is a random vote after he posted again explaining that the post was directed at me.


As to the contradicting, like I explained I thought that he was addresing all random votes but he made a random vote himself.

[Zang]

Zang- How is what I wrote different from what SpyreX wrote? Why did you 'get it' when I wrote almost exactly what SpyreX wrote?

you explained what he was asking me and that it was specified toward me.

[horrordude0215]

Zang, why the overreactions?

[Zang]

Zang, why the overreactions?

how am i overreacting?

The way i see it, everyone else is overreacting about a simple random vote.

[cruelty]

I read the rules, I just don't like fruit. Also, Lorenzo Lamas.


I'm gonna

vote: d3x

. No reason.



Don't have much to add at this point, I'm not feeling that well so I'll be in and out the next day or two.