Mini 928 - Bloodlust Mafia Remix - Over!

[The1fifi]

Actually nope.

Unvote

Vote concerned

cause i have a meta on him

[Concerned]

Actually nope.

Unvote

Vote concerned

cause i have a meta on him

Yeah so when I hammer in the RvS, tunnel on a townie the entire game and finally hand the game to scum in lylo, you'll know I'm town . I would really you rather not use that game as a meta, I didn't exactly cover myself in glory...

[The1fifi]

@Concerned : Ofc i won't, it was a newbie game and your play might have changed as much as mine, so =p.

[Civil Scum]

unvote

vote: 1fifi

fifi or sauve?

Who's in?

[Civil Scum]

Prod Julein ?

[MrSuave]

so many double posts =___= and what do you mean who's in?

[Concerned]

VOTE : 1fifi

I'm in.

[The1fifi]

Me too ^^

unvote

Vote Fifi

[julienvonwolfe]

Mindless self-bandwagoning. My favourite.

Actually nope.

Unvote

Vote concerned

cause i have a meta on him

Is this a random vote couched in joke reasoning, or a real vote designed to provoke a reaction and therefore provide you material to compare to this meta?

If the latter, what of it?

[julienvonwolfe]

/reading fail

never mind, I just read 52.

unvote, vote: fifi

because she's self-voting and not playing with any degree of seriousness. "Hey guys, it's all fun and games rite rite rite?"

[The1fifi]

unvote

it is indeed to provoke a reaction. but not related to meta.

Self voting isn't something scummy, and voting someone for playing nice and joking in the RVS is scummy as f***.

Vote julienvonwolfe

for trying to make up a reason to mask his true reason for jumping in the wagon. Being scum.

[julienvonwolfe]

how long does the RVS have to last? When people start unvoting and changing targets is my idea of when it's time to end it.

Can you explain why playing nice and joking is not scummy in itself? That's the main reason that I voted you. I accept that self-voting is merely anti-town and incredibly annoying, not scummy.

[The1fifi]

By self voting, i got 3 votes. With another person jumping in, it makes 4, which is a pretty good point to start a serious wagon.

I self voted exactly to create a reaction from someone, so i could get a read, cause this game is starting slowly.

You jumped on the wagon acusing me of being funny, and not serious. In my opinion the RVS had not ended. I believe we can say they did now cause we something solid to start working.
What you acused be of, is nothing scummy. If you are going to vote people for being relaxed in the RVS.. well, you have a lot of people to vote on.
What you did was cling on something i did that isn't scummy at all, and try to make it look like it is indeed. You definetely acted like i was hoping scum would act.

[The1fifi]

By self voting, i got 3 votes. With another person jumping in, it makes 4, which is a pretty good point to start a serious wagon.

I self voted exactly to create a reaction from someone, so i could get a read, cause this game is starting slowly.

You jumped on the wagon acusing me of being funny, and not serious. In my opinion the RVS had not ended. I believe we can say they did now cause we have something solid to start working.
What you acused me of, is nothing scummy. If you are going to vote people for being relaxed in the RVS.. well, you have a lot of people to vote on.
What you did was cling on something i did that isn't scummy at all, and try to make it look like it is indeed. You definetely acted like i was hoping scum would act.

Fixed

[bv310]

You really love self-voting, eh fifi?

[Haylen]

oh, btw. Weekends are reserved for my horrific work hours, coursework and modding duties. I will rarely post on weekends.

[julienvonwolfe]

Fifi, I voted for you since by not being serious one could argue that you were trying to buddy up to just about everybody, which I consider scummy.

Also, was your vote in the RVS or not? You've just said that you self-voted for a very thorougly thought-out reason, which is certainly not random. Yet before you told me that it was simply an RVS fun vote.

[ConfidAnon]

Ummm.. I don't see nothing wrong in being friendly.

I see something wrong with double negatives.

And

Unvote, Vote: julienvonwolfe

I wholeheartedly agree with fifi's point about his bandwagon vote.

[The1fifi]

Fifi, I voted for you since by not being serious one could argue that you were trying to buddy up to just about everybody, which I consider scummy.

Also, was your vote in the RVS or not? You've just said that you self-voted for a very thorougly thought-out reason, which is certainly not random. Yet before you told me that it was simply an RVS fun vote.

I most certainly did not. The vote was MASKED indeed as a fun RSV vote. The true motives i already explained.

[julienvonwolfe]

Okay, so you figure you'd get a reaction from self-voting. Of course you would, since it's a bloody stupid thing to do. What, can I ask, would you expect townie players to do, if you expect scum to always do what I did? Should the other people on your wagon, assuming they're town, have said to themselves "hmm, he is self-voting. This is obviously a gambit designed to catch scum, and therefore I will treat it as not suspicious," or what?

So, now you can do the work and prove to the others why voting for somebody who self-votes is scummy. A statistical analysis or some metagaming would be ideal, otherwise it's just an unproven theory with nothing to support it.

As for your saying the vote was masked as an RVS, that's not what you said when you said this: "You jumped on the wagon acusing me of being funny, and not serious. In my opinion the RVS had not ended." This contradiction causes me to get the sense you're just squirming around at the moment.

---

ConfidAnon, what exactly about Fifi's point do you agree with, and why?

[MrSuave]

self voting makes me mads D:<

[Civil Scum]

By self voting, i got 3 votes. With another person jumping in, it makes 4, which is a pretty good point to start a serious wagon.

I self voted exactly to create a reaction from someone, so i could get a read, cause this game is starting slowly.

Yeah, I'll believe this in a million years [/sarcasm]

Insert what julien quoted from fifi in Post 69 here

[Civil Scum]

Although now that I think about it, both of those things: joking in that spirit in RVS and saying that it was meant to get reactions because the game was starting slowly doesn't fully contradict what he said about julien voting him for joking.

[ConfidAnon]

julien

, this:

Vote julienvonwolfe for trying to make up a reason to mask his true reason for jumping in the wagon. Being scum.

Your reasoning that you attached to the vote seemed off to me. Almost as if you were trying to hard to have a reason for your vote.

On a side note: I don't think that self-voting is suspicious . . . It's not good play, tbh, but it's not a serious scumtell.

[The1fifi]

Okay, so you figure you'd get a reaction from self-voting. Of course you would, since it's a bloody stupid thing to do. What, can I ask, would you expect townie players to do, if you expect scum to always do what I did? Should the other people on your wagon, assuming they're town, have said to themselves "hmm, he is self-voting. This is obviously a gambit designed to catch scum, and therefore I will treat it as not suspicious," or what?

So, now you can do the work and prove to the others why voting for somebody who self-votes is scummy.

A statistical analysis or some metagaming would be ideal, otherwise it's just an unproven theory with nothing to support it.

As for your saying the vote was masked as an RVS, that's not what you said when you said this: "You jumped on the wagon acusing me of being funny, and not serious. In my opinion the RVS had not ended." This contradiction causes me to get the sense you're just squirming around at the moment.

---

ConfidAnon, what exactly about Fifi's point do you agree with, and why?

Bold 1 - Really? So anytime i say anything, i am suposed to give you links to something like statistics or articles or metaing to prove it?

Bold 2 - Could you do that statistic /meta thing about what you said? Otherwise that is wrong and can't be used, because people are just variables like x and y, and everyone reacts and plays the esaxct same way (irony).

Am i the only one seing how fail that is? Plus, let me adress something else:

When i said the RVS wasn't not over they definetely were not over. As i posted something like a self vote to get reactions i wouldn't do it like:

"Self vote bla bla, and btw this is the end of RVS because i m fishing for a reaction".

The RVS ended when you voted me for self voting. From that point onwards, we had something to work with.

Everytime you post i have a stronger scum feeling from you. You are just trying to hard to make me look bad, cause you know i am right.[/area]