I don’t think I asked “filled” questions. They were questions designed to try and get some open ended responses.Why did you ask so many filler game theory questions?
Anyway, I find this a ridiculous question from a guy who asked, “are you town?”
2.
If I’m close to being lynched again this time, I’ll claim. But I think it behooves no one to do that now. I shouldn’t be outright lynched this time though, or there are some very scummy people slamming the hammer on me. If I’m the prohibitive favorite to get lynched again, I’ll just ask everyone the same question along the lines of “do you believe the inquisition’s claim; do you plan on voting him still, and if not who should be the lynch?” Just make sure I answer questions FIRST and not after that or else it’s all for nothing.Since you don't have a chance to claim unless you are asked, this question is meant to give you the option to claim. Not a question, consider rephrasing in the future. I'll let it pass this once
3.
I think it’s a pretty typical early game bandwagon, actually. It’s just highlighted because there are so few opportunities to vote in this game and so little ability to actually discuss. I think the 5th and 6th votes were pretty scummy though nothing incredible.You picked up six votes in that first go around. What is your reaction to this large bandwagon?
4.
I think I’ve answered this. I think it’s weak, but that doesn’t mean I think it’s automatically a “Bad” wagon. It’s just an early game one, and if people stick with it despite it just being that, we’re in for some trouble.What is your opinion on the bandwagon on you? Do you think any scum were on it and how many?
5.
Example: I’m tracker. I have a result on you visiting someone but probably not the person who died. I try and get info from you about your role. This allows me a greater ability to determine whether to pursue you for a lynch or not. For example, if you give indication you’re a role that doesn’t visit people, then I’ve got more reason to out you.Elaborate more on what you think specific rolefishing is, and how rolefishing of any kind can be helpful to the town?
6.
What kind of scum-motivation could I have? Because the idea that I somehow asked a bunch of questions with a grand scheme of getting someone to give me their role by pick-up line or fruit is laughable.What pro-town motivation could you have for the question you asked me in Qs1?
Regardless, the game is uninformed majority vs. informed minority. While just outing roles is generally negative for a town (after all, only scum knows whether those claims are true or not), information acquisition IS a pro-town thing to do.
7.
He purposefully avoids giving away any information at all. He refuses, in essence, to play the game. His abstaining vote to me isn’t so problematic as his complete disregard for the question phase. His no vote can be explained a role thing. His refusal to work with the town is absurd.Why did you vote for ellibereth?
8.
Every time I play with Cobalt he comes across as troll. Whether that’s scum troll or town troll is difficult for me to say. I lean scum at this point.What do you think of Cobalt’s play so far?
9.
I think the idea I’m rolefishing motivated the first votes as, like in RVS, the slightest reason suffices. I think the later votes were either by lazy folks or folks who were interested in hiding out on an already large wagon with momentum.There have been several votes against you on the last voting stage. What do you think prompted those votes, and who do you think would have been a better lynch candidate?
10.
Ellibereth remains scummy but probably not day 1 lynch scummy because of the weird-ass half-claim. I’m not buying it’s town in any way, but his lynch gives us little.During the first Question, Answer and Voting stage,whose actions did you find scummy and why?
Dragon would be my preferred lynch. His was simply too convenient jump on my wagon (no, it’s not OMGUS). His answers have been half-baked, but his questions especially so. I’d urge everyone to take a close read of DragonofSummer.
