Serious vote.
@pman - Why do you bash RVS in post 7 calling it "stupid and wasteful", but then random vote/fos in post 18?
@ready2rock and Fugitive - What do you think of malpascp placing a fifth vote on CSL?
Nice OMGUS vote.RichardGHP wrote:I sense a bandwagon forming on me here. Hmm...
Vote: Fugitive
You were quick to follow ready2rock's vote for me. That SCREAMS bandwagon. Also, it's not my fault that I don't know what RVS is, and to be honest, that's pretty poor reasoning for a vote.
OMGUS followed by a noob claim and no mention of the sudden CSL wagon? Smells scummy.RichardGHP wrote:I sense a bandwagon forming on me here. Hmm...
Vote: Fugitive
You were quick to follow ready2rock's vote for me. That SCREAMS bandwagon. Also, it's not my fault that I don't know what RVS is, and to be honest, that's pretty poor reasoning for a vote.
In what way? Is it really that different from the votes for CSL?Konowa wrote:Richards vote of Fugitive is good.
How about you actually give me a question. If you actually read the previous posts there were no questions posed to me, and thus no way I could deflect a question.Konowa wrote:*headdesk*
*headdesk*
*headdesk*
Newbie play in this game is going to hurt me.
unvote;
vote Fugitive
Deflection of question does not feel right. Competing wagon go.
It wasn't OMGUS. I provided reasoning. I don't get how not mentioning the CSL wagon is scum, but whatever. Your vote on me was pretty random. I know that's normally what happens on Day 1, but I guess it's kinda strange going back to it in a new game.NavyCherub wrote:OMGUS followed by a noob claim and no mention of the sudden CSL wagon? Smells scummy.RichardGHP wrote:I sense a bandwagon forming on me here. Hmm...
Vote: Fugitive
You were quick to follow ready2rock's vote for me. That SCREAMS bandwagon. Also, it's not my fault that I don't know what RVS is, and to be honest, that's pretty poor reasoning for a vote.
In what way? Is it really that different from the votes for CSL?Konowa wrote:Richards vote of Fugitive is good.
Unvote Vote RichardGHP
Note: pman5595 may be furry. Must investigate further.Fugitive wrote:How do you point that sucker at more than one person thoughpman5595 wrote:PoS: Fugitive, RichardGHP(yes Scorehero, I'm bringing the penis of suspicion back )
not really sure enough to vote for either one yet.
well there was this incident a few years back with my pet llama, a blender, and the TV show teletubbies. I don't want to talk about it.Fugitive wrote:How do you point that sucker at more than one person thoughpman5595 wrote:PoS: Fugitive, RichardGHP(yes Scorehero, I'm bringing the penis of suspicion back )
not really sure enough to vote for either one yet.
I agree with his [Richard's] assessment that Fugitive looked a little to eager to follow r2r's vote of Richard. The vote itself was pretty poor, especially considering everything else that was already happening.NavyCherub, post 34 wrote:In what way? Is it really that different from the votes for CSL?
How about you read this post again where I address the question very directly for you.Konowa wrote:@Fugitive - I did give you a question, and you deflected. I asked you what you thought of mal's fifth vote. Your first reply in 28 is that "you don't like wagoning early" which speaks nothing to your thoughts of the actual vote. That is a deflection. When I call you out on it, you respond that "you don't like a wagon vote this early". Now, do you find mal suspicious for placing a early fifth vote on CSL?
I agree with Fugitive that it is a bandwagon vote, and I really don't like someone putting a fifth vote on someone in page 1. He even pretty much says it is a bandwagon vote in his post (at least that's the way I interpreted "Any problem with this vote?"). I also don't like how he said that CSL was at L-2 even though he wasn't, trying to put more pressure on him. CSL hadn't even picked up his role PM, and there are 5 votes on him before even HE knows what his role is.@ready2rock and Fugitive - What do you think of malpascp placing a fifth vote on CSL?
I'm not sure whether he even saw my vote before he posted. 2 minutes is a pretty short gap, and he could have posted without refreshing the page and my vote just happened to be there.You were quick to follow ready2rock's vote for me. That SCREAMS bandwagon.
Pretty much this. pman seems like he might be the type who is swayed easily and could hurt the town. Since after he was called out on contradicting himself, he unvoted as if to say, "There. Better?"ready2rock wrote:The only 2 things I find suspicious right now are the CSL bandwagon and pman's change of mind about voting during RVS.
Ok, let's dissect this. This so called "bandwagon" on Richard was the second vote. If I was going to band wagon I definitely would have gone for CSL. It was not a bandwagon in the slightest, it was a random vote. Me disliking the CSL bandwagon is an entirely different and unrelated matter.pman5595 wrote:I've decided.Vote: Fugitive
First he bandwagoned on Richard, then when asked about the CSL wagon he sasid he doesn't like bandwagons this early. Then he seemed to be overly defensive when questioned about. It has a scummy feel.
that is believable, I'll admit.Fugitive wrote:Ok, let's dissect this. This so called "bandwagon" on Richard was the second vote. If I was going to band wagon I definitely would have gone for CSL. It was not a bandwagon in the slightest, it was a random vote. Me disliking the CSL bandwagon is an entirely different and unrelated matter.pman5595 wrote:I've decided.Vote: Fugitive
First he bandwagoned on Richard, then when asked about the CSL wagon he sasid he doesn't like bandwagons this early. Then he seemed to be overly defensive when questioned about. It has a scummy feel.
I'm sorry if you interpret this asoverlydefensive rather than just defending my play. Do you really think after reading my play last game that I would play so irresponsibly this game?
@Pie - I don't really find pman scummy, he just seems overeager and unsure of what to do. The same things I find in Richard. The OMGUS was a random/joke vote. That's why I added "OMGUS" with it...