Policy-only FTL. However, scummy lynches that are also utility lynches (lynching the annoying anti-town, e.g.) are favorable to me.yabbaguy: Do you support policy lynches?
Whose post really bothers you how? I don't think I'm reading this clearly.farside22 wrote:And this is my exact thought too. In fact this post really bothers meStrangerCoug wrote:No. While I should have said earlier that Zachrulez made a good point in post #11, I honestly don't know what the big fuss is about.KittyMo wrote:StrangerCoug: Is it scummy to suggest skipping the RVS?
The fuss that zach is making over kittymo on her not wanting to RVS and willing to vote on the first person to RVS.StrangerCoug wrote:Whose post really bothers you how? I don't think I'm reading this clearly.farside22 wrote:And this is my exact thought too. In fact this post really bothers meStrangerCoug wrote:No. While I should have said earlier that Zachrulez made a good point in post #11, I honestly don't know what the big fuss is about.KittyMo wrote:StrangerCoug: Is it scummy to suggest skipping the RVS?
My thinking also. I played along, did I not?farside22 wrote:The fuss that zach is making over kittymo on her not wanting to RVS and willing to vote on the first person to RVS.
I just think it's not that big of a deal and I didn't see what she did as scummy.
Yeah, I am aware of the fact that I failed. The point was to try a different start to the game that wasn't the RVS. I guess we'll see how much it actually failed later on.yabbaguy wrote: KittyMo: What's the whole point of this method? It's a concept, and it beats RVS, but it's also poorly executed.
You're asking me to figure out what you should do next for you? o.Oyabbaguy wrote: And there's your answer. Question #2: Now what?
Actually, I was planning to just wing it. (Which I guess is an oxymoron.) It would certainly help if more than 4 people had actually answered the questions.yabbaguy wrote:See, I thought you had a purpose of some convoluted sort. I thought you were operating under the belief that somehow the responses were going to get us somewhere, hence "now what?"
KittyMo wrote:Since I apparently fail so much, what better plan would you like to grace us with?
Starting discussion by ridiculing questionable stances.Since I apparently fail so much, what better plan would you like to grace us with?
MrSuave wrote:Nik, why do you not love me? is your new meta for scum against me ignoring me? D= you should just play normaly, and I might not notice you being a spy.
so far:
Nik town = nik hunting me down, even if it doesn't make sense (korlash + grim pokemon)
Nik scum = siding with me and being nice to me (classic wolf... thing... manbearpig)
This game: ignored! =O *sirens* I new challenger is aproaching!!!
the fact that you told me before that that would be the last time you use that meta on me, makes me wonder about this cold shoulder silent treatment D= this is why you are scum this game. GG Nik, dun QQ too much now =p
...that was my point. I was saying that if he seemed to have such a problem with the way I was doing things, shouldn't he come up with something different to do?StrangerCoug wrote:KittyMo wrote:Since I apparently fail so much, what better plan would you like to grace us with?Unvote: yabbaguy
Vote: KittyMo
If one plan for generating discussion fails, try another yourself. Don't ask people to generate discussion for you.
While trying to stop the RVS from happening isn't as going as well as I'd hoped, I don't honestly think I've completely failed. Yabbaguy, however, seems to think so. The post of mine StrangerCoug just quoted was semi-sarcastic. Apparenty that didn't transfer over the internet well? :/Locke Lamora wrote: Kitty: why do you think you've failed? You obviously don't know how this is going to pan out later on, so this attitude strikes me as a little AtE-ish.
Someone says your plan A has failed, and you expect him or her to have a plan B as backup? I don't really know how realistic that is.KittyMo wrote:...that was my point. I was saying that if he seemed to have such a problem with the way I was doing things, shouldn't he come up with something different to do?StrangerCoug wrote:KittyMo wrote:Since I apparently fail so much, what better plan would you like to grace us with?Unvote: yabbaguy
Vote: KittyMo
If one plan for generating discussion fails, try another yourself. Don't ask people to generate discussion for you.
yes, that would be the assumption. but this is a meta that has more than the proof on this mafia site. we (Nik and I) are RL friends, and he has never once spared me in a game, even if I was on his team. he is always out to get me, so that's why this has merit. yes, he continued his shinanigans in mafia, and when he broke away from that he was scum and I killed him for it =D. your argument has merit, but that only applies to people who mearly know one another in this game, or do not game together often. and yes, this does not mean that my whole case is perfect, but so far it has not failed me. and by your logic, Nik should be tunneling me right now, but alas, he is not.farside22 wrote:MrSuave wrote:Nik, why do you not love me? is your new meta for scum against me ignoring me? D= you should just play normaly, and I might not notice you being a spy.
so far:
Nik town = nik hunting me down, even if it doesn't make sense (korlash + grim pokemon)
Nik scum = siding with me and being nice to me (classic wolf... thing... manbearpig)
This game: ignored! =O *sirens* I new challenger is aproaching!!!
the fact that you told me before that that would be the last time you use that meta on me, makes me wonder about this cold shoulder silent treatment D= this is why you are scum this game. GG Nik, dun QQ too much now =p
meta is overrated you know. I have this discussion so many times I feel like I'm on repeat. If a play is scum and knows what another player expects of them as town would they not act that way to ensure their townness.
Ah.MrSuave wrote:yes, that would be the assumption. but this is a meta that has more than the proof on this mafia site. we (Nik and I) are RL friends, and he has never once spared me in a game, even if I was on his team. he is always out to get me, so that's why this has merit. yes, he continued his shinanigans in mafia, and when he broke away from that he was scum and I killed him for it =D. your argument has merit, but that only applies to people who mearly know one another in this game, or do not game together often. and yes, this does not mean that my whole case is perfect, but so far it has not failed me. and by your logic, Nik should be tunneling me right now, but alas, he is not.farside22 wrote:MrSuave wrote:Nik, why do you not love me? is your new meta for scum against me ignoring me? D= you should just play normaly, and I might not notice you being a spy.
so far:
Nik town = nik hunting me down, even if it doesn't make sense (korlash + grim pokemon)
Nik scum = siding with me and being nice to me (classic wolf... thing... manbearpig)
This game: ignored! =O *sirens* I new challenger is aproaching!!!
the fact that you told me before that that would be the last time you use that meta on me, makes me wonder about this cold shoulder silent treatment D= this is why you are scum this game. GG Nik, dun QQ too much now =p
meta is overrated you know. I have this discussion so many times I feel like I'm on repeat. If a play is scum and knows what another player expects of them as town would they not act that way to ensure their townness.
Is it your position that people who make meta arguments are scummy then?Lowell wrote:If kitty can keep up this intensity throughout she'll be an asset. If she can't than this will be a waste of our time. In general I agree with nik's assesment.
unvote, vote zach. 39 and 41, taken together, rub me the wrong way. 39 is meta and 41 is defensive and meta.