The deadline is Monday, 27 June at 23:59 EST. Thirteen votes are required to lynch.
No prods currently needed.
Hinduragi wrote:
Equinox wrote:Faraday's thinking on this was that early setup speculation from Mina was a weak town tell; furthermore, he doubted that Mina-scum would want to face the scrutiny ofhaving to come up with a pro-town-looking plan and then following through with it.
...Since town hasn't been able to follow through with it, wouldn't scum be more likely to try it and pretend they followed through with it and failed?
Swift Justice wrote:Screaming Death Clan wrote:OH HAI FARADAY PROBABLY SHOULDNT BE LOOKING AT YOUR TOWN ROLE PM WHILE IM RIGHT BEHIND YOU
LOL GAME BROKENS
<_<
>_>
WE'RE MASONS ANYWAY.
Swift Justice wrote:
Town: Mina, Toogeloo, Katsuki, Regfan, ToastyToast, inHimshallibe, Magister Ludi
Maybe Town: AurorusVox, Internet Stranger
Maybe Scum: Vi, HezLucky
Scum: RedCoyote, SocioPath, danakillsu
In Limbo: Screaming Death Clan, PookyTheMagicalBear, MagnaofIllusion, ooba, SpyreX
Swift Justice (spefically Faraday) gets scum-points for 353. Why? Because I know for a FACT that Faraday scum pulls the kind of exact shit Mina / others were talking about. You did it in MetaMafia. So it being your biggest pet-peeve means jack crap.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Now that ooba has claimed to have picked up Airbase
Hinduragi wrote:
You know what pisses me off? I posted a pretty damning piece on the entire AV wagon and it gets ignored.
Magua wrote:
@MagnaofIllusion:Please explain what you mean here.
danakillsu wrote:Odd. So you think that RC and I have a scum QT together, and planned that he would bus me to no end, but I would refuse to bus him in return? That doesn't sound like any scum plan I've ever heard.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:
I thought it was pretty straightforward. If I was a smart-ass who liked graphics I'd post a pic of some sort of map right here.
1. SDC came into the thread right after DEFCON 3 started saying "What Rat Bastard .... blah blah". What I took from this - he is claiming to not have Airbase given he's throwing a fit in that post.
2. ooba's next post has a pic of a Rat and he says something along the line of "You rang?" I took from this he was taunting Fate / SDC about getting Airbase.
This of course can clearly be WIFOMing everyone about who does or doesn't have Airbase by those two.
Swift Justice wrote:(Equinox)
danakillsu wrote:Odd. So you think that RC and I have a scum QT together, and planned that he would bus me to no end, but I would refuse to bus him in return? That doesn't sound like any scum plan I've ever heard.
It's not impossible. Besides, not all things that scum do are planned.
danakillsu wrote:I think you can be pretty darn sure that RC and I would have planned something that major if we were going to do it as scum together. But it not being impossible is not really good enough, because just about everything's POSSIBLE. This obviously indicates you realize it's unlikely, which means your scumlist doesn't make sense. I've got my eye on you.
AurorusVox wrote:Toog: Opinions on the RC wagon?
RC wrote: At this point either ML or AV would be my strongest scumreads. My strongest townread is probably SP.
AV wrote:This is precisely what I was thinking when reading that post. AV, my poor AV, has got to eat the first lynch this game, I'm afraid.
Hindu wrote:You know what pisses me off? I posted a pretty damning piece on the entire AV wagon and it gets ignored.
MoI wrote:But why aren’t Sociopath, Swift Justice, SDC or any number of normally prolific posters who aren’t lighting up the boards suspect in your eyes? Why is Internet Stranger the only one you mention?
RC wrote:@Everyone: If we could make the first lynch a competition between dana and AV, I think we'd be off to such a good start. Both of these lynches are based on very solid ground at this point. Hez, well, not so much.
IS wrote:Come DEFCON 1, the socialists will pay.
RC wrote:Given the fact that I think both dana and AV have a good chance at being scum, then it's more likely that I'm right about one of those predictions than it is if I advocated, say, Hez, who I do not consider to have a greater chance at being scum (over dana or AV).
RC wrote:Mmm, this is a bit frustrating now because I see where y'all are coming from. I wasn't intending to pull any sort of trick. I, uh, I think I'm being a little too analytical and distant for my own good here. I think I'll just stop talking for a while.
SJ wrote:Today happens to be Read DEFCON Day, so I'm doing that now and continuing when I come back home. Hold me to this, etc.
Swift Justice wrote:i'm not reading the thread but she need to die.
Toogeloo wrote:Not a single person has even commented on my opinion of SocioPath since I voted him? Is he not worth people's time, and my opinion mean very little, to at least comment on the case I posted? His content is still fluffy. There is nothing there, and I imagine we won't see him again with anything remarkable for some time.
Magister Ludi wrote:This is bad reasoning. If you think someone is playing in a scummy manner (as Socio is in fact doing), you don't pass it up or fail to call them out on it. You try and push the wagon. The fact that you also consider him acting in a scummy manner, but not worth lynching, but nukeable, is not a stance I understand or expect to come from a town point of view.
SJ wrote:If I've left you out, I have no idea who the heck you are, and I expect to acquaint myself when I read the first 20 pages or so of game. If, after that, I still don't know who you are, I'm nuking you, Faraday fervor be damned.
SJ wrote:HezLucky needs nuking, I think, but I'll need to reread him also, particularly his later posts when the momentum moves off him and onto RedCoyote.
inHimshallibe wrote:Well, then Equinox comes and posts up ins. Re: RC saying he could be wrong - definitely agree that is not the scum part of this equation. It is that he claims that while not providing a reasonable justification for bumping AV down/moving dana up than "Competing wagons are good."
SDC wrote:One of those lurker easily bussed clowns among Dana, Toasty, Gorilla