angelmouse wrote:
surely it was a joke. We're only on page two, game barely started and with 12 players it's hardly a lynch situation.
Jumping the gun a bit and voting on it?? Strange play
fos, cot.cathartic
Putting possible slips off as jokes is bad. It sets a bad precedent for the rest of the game. There was also no real reason for her to jump in here at the defense of The Tracker.
The FOS is horribly weak, basically saying it's too early to scumhunt which is BS.
I wasn't defending tracker, i just read it as a joke and thought it strange that Col.C had read into it so harshly and voted on it. I haven't said anything in defence of tracker anyway, more just my interpretation of it. I think mislynch is the wrong word and a slip up, but is a scum slip up, I don't know yet, more time required to work that out. I agree that voting on something he suspects is def the best play, but it was flimsy reasoning in my opinion. We had barely entered RV stage and im all for getting out of it quickly, but to find someone scummy on their first post and put a serious vote on it is strange and something to mention and watch. I might be wrong in my game theory, but i like to get a flavour for everyone and the way they are playing. Hats off to it though, game has properly started.
'I wasn't defending tracker' isn't really true. Not that she's lying, but by attacking the attack I think she is defending tracker.
If she's all for getting out of the RV stage quickly then why is voting on supposed flimsy reasoning a bad thing. There's no other way you can get out is there?
ISO 3 is the definition of hypocrisy. The scummy kind too.
Her next two posts are filler, basically saying why she's not here, which is reasonable enough. I don't get the impression she was lurking/avoiding the thread (and it's impossible to check without search on :/) but yeah, she probably was busy.
I'm not for a quagmire lynch today. Thing is though, i do see it as pro scum though.
I'm not sure if this means she thinks what quag is doing is scummy (and she can't clarify) but if she does the lack of vote is odd.
Then she gives her reads on several players. She has quite a few neutral reads and then a couple of leaning either way but she's unsure of. All in all it's pretty bad I think. She does provide some substanital reasoning for voting the tracker at the end, so it's not like she's incapable of doing it (providing content on players) either.
Her whole 'critical thinking' regarding the scum on the quag wagon wasn't really critical thinking at all as was pointed out. She then proceeds to babble for a few posts that's really just explaining her tracker vote.
She asks for a claim at L-3 (I believe). But stupid, but since Quag wasn't scum it doesn't seem like she was trying to save a buddy or anything so I've really no idea here.
That's it for day 1.
Her only day 2 post was coming out voting for the tracker for really poor reasoning. Trying to guess the set-up is stupid, and using one flip as a basis for your both is really weak.
There's also the odd exchange where Red says she's bringing 'critical thinking to the game' which baffles me, and I guess makes me think there's a better than average chance of them being scum together, trying to show your scumbuddies as actually scumhunting obviously makes them look good, and considering there was nothing remarkable in her posts well yeah. I also am not sure how he likes her player analysis post, but it seems we tend to disagree on quite a lot in terms of playstyle anyway so I guess if he has reasons I can't hold that against either of them. Or not too strongly at least.
EDFROST
It says Vi reviewed the set-up on the first page, click the link it brings you to Vi's profile
Hey Edfrost I just realised you've done pretty much nothing for me to get a read on you? I mean yeah, you interact with Tracker, but eh, that's about it early on.
Your vote on Mindgamer seems poor to me. Why is voting a believed power role a scum tell? It's pretty obvious that if he's voting for the tracker he doesn't believe them. Seems to be a disagreement = scummy kinda thing, which is obviously a poor road to go down, even if it does tend to happen.
Also lol u lazy bum. You went from wanting to analyse and discuss things to putting Mindgamer at L-1 with rather shoddy reasoning. (I'm not going to do a fake EBWOP, dw)
So it's alright for you to provide garbage on Mindgamer, but yet you're overly concerned and apparently unable to read that I posted stuff on you.
I disagree with Mindgamer, I don't think Edfrost has 'honest reasons' for being on your bandwagon at all. It looked like he just wanted to end the day after deciding he wouldn't get much flak for jumping on ya.
Anyway as I said most of the scumminess comes from the first player, angelmouse, the only thing there is I don't like about Edfrost is the mindgamer vote after saying there was a lot more to dicuss. Everything else is pretty much null, reading him in Iso didn't really change that. I see him and redcoyote as having a good chance of sharing a scum alignment too.
Idk if this is a incoherent babble or not, but to me it makes me think Edfrost is a good lynch. Certainly very confused by anyone calling him town in any way shape or form. He's da scum.
You asked for specific points against you, that is to say Edfrost so you could refute them.
