L-1? Roleclaim time I guess.
Vanilla Townie
I'm probably going to be lynched at this point in time (lynching Day 1 because someone is not reading his role PM and lynching Day 2 because someone is smokescreening. Wow, amazing townplay here), but that won't stop me from posting some last bits.
EdFrost.
ISO 11: Mindgamer may be the favorite to lynch (I agree that mindgamer is scummy), but that shouldn't maintain sole focus when there are other things to consider as well.
EdFrost states here that I'm a good lynch candidate, but tries to convince the other players that other important things should be considered before the lynch. He doesn't say what those things are.
ISO 13: Since mindgamer has been scummy from the get go (offering up an unneeded defense of tracker) throughout the midgame (believing a claim due to "rareness") and currently (voting a "believed" *power role* at the beginning of the day, discouraging setup speculation and the amazing Wall of no Analysis (tm) vote count), I believe that we have our lynch for today.
Wow, complete 180. Why should we discuss any further? I'm scummy so my lynch is all we need for the rest of the day. What happened to those 'other things to consider'?
ISO 15: Well, Tracker was questioned, nothing mindgamer says anymore will really matter, watching what hoopla and Red have to say to each other, and not especially pleased with the fact that other people aren't chiming in as much to question them.
Ah, so those are the 'other things to consider'. A question to Tracker (EdFrost is apparently satisfied with a completely useless result. He delayed his vote for 'don't twist mah words!'?) and watching Hoopla vs RedCoyote. Yeah, really important stuff.
Take a look at this tomorrow if you decide to lynch me before this can be discussed.
And a question:
Wouldn't the people who did lynch him receive more blame for actually lynching him and whiting out the town with arguments about something non-game related be scummier than somebody who saw what was happening?
This seems like a rhetorical question, though I disagree. In the case of a policy lynch, everyone who did nothing to stop the Quagmire lynch is just as guilty as those who voted for him. Why would those who voted for him be the ones to blame when Quagmire flipped town? Would they also be the heroes if Quagmire flipped scum? Explain your logic.