One word: classy.[i]In Post 373[/i] Adel wrote:opie has 57 game posts on mafiascum.net
Now he is telling me how to play mafia? Seriously, STFU with that "spirit of Mafia" nonsense. Mafia is a game that was developed by Math geeks with an interest in game theory, like me.
I thought 2000 words posts contributed to my "activeness". Isn't that a good thing?[i]In Post 373[/i] Adel wrote:We tend to ignore 2000 word posts filled with subjective nonsense and logic so fuzzy and undefined that it is impossible to engage.
If I followed correctly, you were trying to convince others to encrypt secret messages so that townies could communicate privately. So I see that both are rooted in math, but that seems all that they have in common. I don't understand why you brind this up.[i]In Post 373[/i] Adel wrote:Note that I was lynched the same day I replaced in, and I was a townie. Try to follow my posts- I did generate a game winning tactic (rooted in math) that the town decided to lynch me for.
But you're not really. You are honest in that you are using an algorithm, but that seems to be all the explanation you provide. You won't show us what lies under the algorithm.[i]In Post 390[/i] Adel wrote: I though I would try being a little more honest in this game- and actually explain what is driving me to the conclusions I reach.
I'm curious what your algorithm has to say about mcpaltp. What's his percentage? Is your vote for him based on anything other than his breadcrumb role claim?[i]In Post 367[/i] Adel wrote:So, despite my earlier post saying that he was not a good lynch choice for today, unvote:opie, vote:mcpaltp
Boggzie, you said that neko2086's vote for Adel was distracting. He asked you why but I don't see that you responded, only saying that he is now off your list for reason's you would like to share until Adel responds. I would also like to join in asking why the vote was distracting and what are you waiting for Adel to respond to?
ThAdmiral, I think this is the first you've mentioned by suspicious of TheHermit. What are you suspicious of?