1. a ring of color, as around the human nipple.
2. a small interstice, as between the fibers of connective tissue.
Deadline is in
OK, so to recap, you're saying if you wanted to unvote you would have just done it in that first post I quoted where you said you were retracting the meta part of your argument.In post 343, Jargonaut wrote:@Tool: I'm referring to the first and second posts of mine that you quoted in your reads list.
No, because scum have no genuine town motivation behind voting for somebody. So it would make sense for scum to want to vote for somebody else but not be sure who.In post 343, Jargonaut wrote:Where is the logic behind me waiting to unvote TSO so that I can vote someone else, but then not actually knowing who to vote? Doesn't the idea of me wanting to vote someone else imply that I have someone else in mind to vote?
You're getting bogged down in the fringes of what I said. The core of my argument is this. These behaviors:In post 343, Jargonaut wrote:This while scenario is convoluted, and it seems like you are just trying to make something seem scummy when it isn't.
I don't agree that it's one of Cho's best posts, but I don't think it was particularly scummy either. Now that you point it out, B_E pointing to that post as the main reason he flip-flopped and voted for Cho makes B_E look worse in my eyes. There was plenty to scumread Cho for before that post, but that's the one that made him switch? Seems like shallow reasoning to me.In post 351, T S O wrote:I don't think that post is actually particularly bad - it's one of Cho's best posts, Burning_Earth.
You'll notice that between my posts 87 and 209, multiple people said that TSO's play at the time was similar to his town meta. I hadn't really thought about TSO for a while after reading those posts, so when Cho's post reminded me of my vote on him, I decided it no longer had merit.In post 352, toolenduso wrote:OK, so to recap, you're saying if you wanted to unvote you would have just done it in that first post I quoted where you said you were retracting the meta part of your argument.In post 343, Jargonaut wrote:@Tool: I'm referring to the first and second posts of mine that you quoted in your reads list.
Fair enough, but that's exactly what makes me suspicious. Why wouldn't you have just unvoted then?
I'm not sure how that emoticon got in my post... for a second I thought you added it to point something out in the quote. That's really weird.In post 352, toolenduso wrote:No, because scum have no genuine town motivation behind voting for somebody. So it would make sense for scum to want to vote for somebody else but not be sure who.In post 343, Jargonaut wrote:Where is the logic behind me waiting to unvote TSO so that I can vote someone else, but then not actually knowing who to vote? Doesn't the idea of me wanting to vote someone else imply that I have someone else in mind to vote?
The fact that you don't seem to understand that actually makes me feel a little better about your slot though because it suggests you don't understand how scum would see things. Not enough to make you a townread, but it makes you a little less suspicious.
It would be helpful for me if I could see your scum games. Could you provide links?
I already responded to Cho when she said that exact same thing. You've read the post, I'm sure, seeing as you already quoted it.In post 352, toolenduso wrote:You're getting bogged down in the fringes of what I said. The core of my argument is this. These behaviors:In post 343, Jargonaut wrote:This while scenario is convoluted, and it seems like you are just trying to make something seem scummy when it isn't.
-Retracting the biggest part of your argument for scumreading someone
-Declaring that they are still your biggest suspect
-Keeping your vote on them anyway
Seem scummy to me because they contradict each other and therefore suggest that your motives aren't genuine.
Yes. I agree with TSO.In post 366, T S O wrote:Oh, yes, that's what I couldn't think of - I want the Elyse-scum argument, Riptide, and I don't want you diluting it from necromancy. In your next post, please.
-HS
In post 22, Riptide wrote:Burning_Earth- Why the third vote on Egg on pg1?
In post 43, Riptide wrote:@Cho - So let me get this straight. You made those three unlynchables because of their RVS votes?
- Dice
In post 46, Riptide wrote:I'm bad at this.In post 45, 3dicerolling wrote:So you see them as unlynchable, but not as concrete town?
In post 50, Riptide wrote:What about there RVS votes make you think they should not be lynched today?
- dice
My case on riptide.In post 347, Riptide wrote:I'm not really good with hydras yet. :p
I'm getting too many townreads. Need to talk it over with HS.
I'm gonna use myself as an example- you read my case/ISO on Elyse? You saw how I explained what I was thinking as I was looking through the posts? Please do.In post 370, Burning_Earth wrote:In post 22, Riptide wrote:Burning_Earth- Why the third vote on Egg on pg1?In post 43, Riptide wrote:@Cho - So let me get this straight. You made those three unlynchables because of their RVS votes?
- DiceIn post 46, Riptide wrote:I'm bad at this.In post 45, 3dicerolling wrote:So you see them as unlynchable, but not as concrete town?In post 50, Riptide wrote:What about there RVS votes make you think they should not be lynched today?
- diceMy case on riptide.In post 347, Riptide wrote:I'm not really good with hydras yet. :p
I'm getting too many townreads. Need to talk it over with HS.
Riptide attacked cho without voting her until other people had.
Another masterpiece from B_E cases TM
Oh this is your elyse caseIn post 309, Riptide wrote:10 RVS means nothing right now.
25 MTD makes an RVS vote. Big deal. Woop-dee-doo he says people OMGUS'd. Is that really enough to deserve a serious vote? Or is it scum trying to look like they're doing something?(Yes, I'm using your own argument against you. Tit for tat.)
63 I've already commented on this one, here's the link- 78
80 Buuut I like being productive and trying to get out of RVS. So I'm going to ask a question to get us out of RVS.
Bad excuse is bad. Nowhere had you mentioned thinking that "them OMGUS's were incredible" was trying to justify anything. You just said he was trying to avoid commentary.
82 This is just WIFOM. There is no other word to describe it.
112 It's. Not. A. Dumb. Question.
114 No, you just said it was dumb. No explanation for it.
156 This post is boring for me. It felt as if it should've happened sooner, honestly.
162 Well, this is the post we're responding to above, so...(and here be it-
The RVS question (While not me, nor my specialty in RVS) actually was not as dumb as you think. It draws reactions, like yours, which was pretty scummy by the way. Considering this is a hydra, and we have to work out our thoughts together, no we did not have much content at the time, but that is changing as the game progresses.
Nowhere were the words "textbook" and "newbscum" used together. I said you were "nearly textbook buddying." To me it looked like that IF Cho flipped town, then you as scum was trying to get credit for calling her a town read. Also, you were defending her, possibly making her think you were town for doing so, simply because of the fact that you "helped" her.
Also, you criticize us for making a question, but the you also criticize us for only attacking certain people. That makes no sense. Also, at the time, the only person we really attacked was you. Everyone else we mentioned was someone we were starting to engage.
188 Yeah, um, I never knew you stopped either.
231 Yeah we are. Look at our interactions with you. Also, I watch and get reads from others' interactions with each other early D1, which is one reason I haven't been very active.
235 This is a weird post. Confirmation bias goes either way. Everybody does it. It's human nature.
237 And just a question that really IS pointless because Elyse isn't being patient.
Sorry, for the formatting of course. You'll definitely want another window open.
B_E is a ninja