Mini 1568: Another Awesome Alliteration Adventure (over)

[Elyse]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: MTD

That vote looked like you didn't want to step on toes and instead of commenting on another vote (I think mnemonic's Riptide vote was good), you said the first person to post is scum. It's like you're trying to keep us in RVS.

[Dunhamganger]

Unvote

.

Vote: MTD

.

[Cho]

I am 100% confident that Cho, Elyse, and mnemonicdevice are Town for their votes. Accordingly, they are now Town Day 1 Unlynchables.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: MTD

[T S O]

I am 100% confident that Cho, Elyse, and mnemonicdevice are Town for their votes. Accordingly, they are now Town Day 1 Unlynchables.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: MTD

Yeah, your vote wasn't one bit unlynchable.

Vote: Cho

Thanks for getting us out of RVS.

[MTD]

Ah, yes, it is true we were probably already a bit further than that, nothing intentional, just wanted to come in on the game and I hadn't really put any thought into it at that point. I am ok with Elyse's vote on me for that reason, maybe with Dunhamganger's, too, cause wooo, wagons, but I am p sure I want more than "yay these people are sooo town based on RVS votes" from Cho. Staying with my vote.

Also
@Elyse: Any reason you think mnemonics Vote was good? From my POV it just looks like a pretty dull RVS-OMGUS.
Also, The only other vote that I would maybe have found to be worth commenting on was burnings' for wagon-jumping much but Riptide already did that. Other than that I often don't find much to comment on in RVS.

[T S O]

You shouldn't be okay with votes on you. These people are calling you scum, not throwing you a party.

[T S O]

oh hi tool!

winning scumteam last game: you paranoid of me?

[Cho]

Oh gosh!

T S O

, how are we out of RVS now? Wasn't it already so earlier?

MTD

, I feel wonderfully comfortable with Elyse and mnemonicdevice's RVS votes! Of course those votes don't mean they're town, but I found them much more pleasant than anything caledfwitch or Burning_Earth said.

As a result, Cho, Elyse, and mnemonicdevice are exempt from much of my suspicion for today, provided that they don't royally fuck up, of course!

[T S O]

Oh my god you're scum aren't you.

You didn't address my vote

Then you backtracked to saying Unlynchable doesn't mean Town

Then you qualified your previous reads when there had been no posts from them since

[T S O]

Hang this, thanks.

When she flips scum I'm conftown, by the way.

[MTD]

@TSO, I am ok with Elyse's vote meaning I think it is ok to point that out and she isn't scum for it, she is still wrong ofc.

[T S O]

She doesn't have to be scum, but if she's wrong, who's gonna point it out? You!

But there's caught scum in Cho so sheep me.

[MTD]

You do realize I am currently voting Cho?

[Dunhamganger]

He surely hasn't had time to read your posts in his rush to be the coolest kid on the block.

[T S O]

coolest and correctest.

It looks like you have an issue with my logic. Go on.

[Cho]

Why should I have to address that, instead of other things you've said? (Your vote's not really that interesting, though your attitude certainly is!)

Forming RVS townreads in no way seriously confirms someone as town. Don't be silly. But if I have an RVS townread and happiness read on someone, unless their play drastically changes, I'm not going to want to lynch them at all!

How does me elaborating on my posts make me scum? As I see it, you're attacking me, so I should be expected to respond, no?

Lastly, why should we assume that this game is or isn't multiball? Regardless, you'll never be conftown, because you're being quite mean right now.

Preview edit:

T S O

, you're quite a "force of nature", as some might say! The louder your thunder, the deafer we become~

But if that's your intent, then so be it!

UNVOTE:
VOTE: T S O

[T S O]

I don't have to be nice to be Town.

You should explain why you're voting me, because you think I'm scum, so now you have to provide your reasoning.

[Dunhamganger]

I think she made it pretty clear that she pretty much just doesn't like you.

(Which: I find your youthful exuberance quite rejuvenating, frankly. I just don't think you've sniffed anything resembling "logic.")

[Riptide]

@Cho - So let me get this straight. You made those three unlynchables because of their RVS votes?

- Dice

[Cho]

T S O

, I've already explained, dear! You clearly want this game to bend to your layers of self-confidence and false scumtells, but the more you speak out, screaming "look at how loud and consequently how open I'm being; you cannot hope to do anything

but

townread me for my arrogance!", the more you detract from us being able to focus on the game and playerlist as a whole.

And that's just not

right

, sadly.

Preview edit:

Riptide

, yes, of course! Their votes and posts simply looked so comfortable. It certainly doesn't look like scum forcing themselves to play along with town's "true RVS" game, as may happen when scum are trying to choose whether to place their first vote on a teammate or not!

Of course, this isn't a concrete towntell, as I've already explained. But I like their votes, and so far I like Elyse's style!

[3dicerolling]

So you see them as unlynchable, but not as concrete town?

[Riptide]

So you see them as unlynchable, but not as concrete town?

I'm bad at this.

[Cho]

Riptide

, nobody is concrete town at this point. It would be silly to make such an assumption of alignment so early on, when not everybody has even fully entered into the game so that we can even analyze them

But while I'm not allowing myself to completely exclude those players, Elyse in particular, from potentially being scum, I

am

allowing myself the small luxury of feeling like I can trust them for the time being. (Meaning, I'm not going to bother myself in trying to envision scenarios where they could be scum, at least for Day 1.)

[Cho]

Sorry, dear. That second sentence was supposed to end with a ".", also known as a "period" or "full stop", depending on your preference of English. My apologies!

[T S O]

Forming RVS townreads in no way seriously confirms someone as town. Don't be silly.

The term you used was "Unlynchables". Not Townreads. UNLYNCHABLES. Now, maybe this is a reaaalllly peculiar quirk of mine, but when I see an absolute term like Unlynchable, I assume it's serious. Maybe it's just me, though.

But if I have an RVS townread and happiness read on someone, unless their play drastically changes, I'm not going to want to lynch them at all!

A townread and a happiness read. A happ-i-ness read.

What the actual fuck.

How does me elaborating on my posts make me scum? As I see it, you're attacking me, so I should be expected to respond, no?

Elaborating isn't the problem here; you knew you'd slipped so you started backtracking, and you can see it clearly that your stances on your "Unlynchables" make no sense.

Lastly, why should we assume that this game is or isn't multiball?

Assume non-multiball until proven multiball is my mantra regarding this.

Regardless, you'll never be conftown, because you're being quite mean right now.

You do not treat people as conftown because they are NICE to you. You treat them as conftown because they look Town, or do Town things. Niceness has nothing to do with this!