Makes sense if Corvuus is scum, but it doesn't say much of anything at all if he's innocent. And for the record, I didn't realize deadline was so close/had passed until I read the end day post. That, and I didn't much like the fallen_angel case, and likely would've abstained.Rhinox wrote:vote Corvuus
The fact that the FA lynch didn't happen and no lynch was allowed to happen makes me think it is even more likely FA/Corvuus is scum and his buddies didn't vote for him to allow a no-lynch to happen.
{havingfitz, lrdwhyt, cruelty, nocmen, DP} - there are definitely scum here for allowing the mislynch to happen, whatever corvuus' allignment is.
That...doesn't make much sense. If scum wanted anyone who town wanted to lynch alive, then they'd be fighting against every lynch that happens.Empking wrote:Incognito: If town wanted to lynch FA then surely regardless of FA's alignment scum wanted him to live.
What are you talking about?Empking wrote:havingfitz wrote:You are all over the place with your votes.Empking wrote:Unvote- I've read another game that Singer is in and I'm no longer convinced she's scum. (I think its playstyle)
Vote: Lrd
I've voted two players today. That's hardly "all over the place".He's a lurking liar.Do you have a reason for voting Lrdwhyt?
As deadline was approaching, Empking and fallen angel were both tied at L-3. Incognito broke that tie by voting fallen angel, saying that he was more likely to be lynched...not true, as they were tied, and Adumbro followed. If Empking is scum, then Incognito probably is as well. If fallen angel is scum, Incognito probably is innocent, unless both Empking/fallen angel are scum.Incognito wrote:Anywho, fallen angel seems like he has the best shot of getting lynched
Going to say that the lack of a scum hammering fallen_angel doesn't look good for Corvuus, but it definitely doesn't guarantee that he's scum. Although, I also thought that him stating Rhinox scumslipped, but not following up was strange, but he was already voting someone else for a "scumslip", so again, not a great indicator of lack of innocence.
No, go back and read. He did repeatedly say that massclaiming was a good idea, after the first time, making it sound like a genuine proposal rather than just a reaction test type thing.Rhinox wrote:I disagree with you. While Empking might have thought he could have eventually got the town to agree with him and he might even think mass claiming is the best strategy, he didn't even try to back up his proposal with solid reasoning or really try to convince anyone. That tells me the proposal was more of a "kick start the game" type of proposal, rather than an earnest proposal. I mean, do you really think scum goes "oh hai mass claim time we should do it because its the best plan because it is" and just expects everyone to follow along without question? That'd be naive for empking to think that, and its lazy scumhunting to think that makes empking scum.
Probably not, unless he has no way to back out. And his play doesn't make sense for an innocent who has a scummy for best town performance. So...yeah.Rhinox wrote:see, right here. So you're saying you expect scum to keep arguing for an unpopular course of action that has half the town calling for his head?