Things arent going nowhere here at the moment, and I need a lead here, there doesnt seem to be one at the moment, then again,
ok, my vote is serious now.
He says it like he had a reason even though he said it was random.
ok, my vote is serious now.
Qwints is number one on my list at the moment, hes voting for poor reason so far.GadgetArcrep wrote:I'm Going to Retract My Vote.Unvote
Things arent going nowhere here at the moment, and I need a lead here, there doesnt seem to be one at the moment, then again,I vote qwintsHe flip flopped too quickly by saying, and I quote.ok, my vote is serious now.
He says it like he had a reason even though he said it was random.
I hear, and I obey =PShotty to the Body wrote:Could be, I'm keeping my vote where it is until Toledo88 posts.
Why would falkoscum be more likely to OMGUS vote than falkotown?unvote, vote falkomango
For making an acknowledged OMGUS vote.
I'll take that as a random vote... I think.Giskard wrote:vote: Toledo88for the following reason:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/88_(number ... azi_symbol
Toledo88 wrote:I'll take that as a random vote... I think.Giskard wrote:vote: Toledo88for the following reason:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/88_(number ... azi_symbol
...should've said its cas his name sounds like a gas station...88? Really? XDGiskard wrote:vote: Toledo88for the following reason:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/88_(number ... azi_symbol
OH no, 88 is fine. Voting for someone for that number is WEIRD. Don't fret x]Toledo88 wrote:It was originally going to be 25, but 88 is easier to type. Whatever.
You call and FoS pressure? ._.falkomagno wrote:ok...let put some pressure right now...since it's early and there is not real reasons to put in danger anybody...but, the explanation of qwints doesn't be enought...unvote, Fos qwints
Toledo88 wrote:I hear, and I obey =PShotty to the Body wrote:Could be, I'm keeping my vote where it is until Toledo88 posts.
I have a question for qwints:Why would falkoscum be more likely to OMGUS vote than falkotown?unvote, vote falkomango
For making an acknowledged OMGUS vote.
Mod, I believe on the last vote count, you didn't note that Gadget was voting for qwints. Currently, it says he's not voting.Unless I managed to somehow misinterpret the vote count -.-
I also forgot to do this before: Welcome to the game everyone
an FoS* =_=PhilyEc wrote:You call and FoS pressure? ._.falkomagno wrote:ok...let put some pressure right now...since it's early and there is not real reasons to put in danger anybody...but, the explanation of qwints doesn't be enought...unvote, Fos qwints
I wasn't voting for him BECAUSE of the the number, I was voting for him because that number made is name jump out at me.PhilyEc wrote:OH no, 88 is fine. Voting for someone for that number is WEIRD. Don't fret x]Toledo88 wrote:It was originally going to be 25, but 88 is easier to type. Whatever.
Also [bumpbumpbump] more activity plz, I wanna find scum.
You can't create pressure by saying "let's pressure him." You create pressure through pointed questions and votes. The fact that you say "there is not reals reasons to put in danger anybody" makes this post basically white noise.falkomagno wrote:ok...let put some pressure right now...since it's early and there is not real reasons to put in danger anybody...but, the explanation of qwints doesn't be enought...unvote, Fos qwints
You're clearly misrepresenting me. My first vote choice switch was a joking response to falkomango. I made it clear (upon Phily_EC's) request that I was not being seroius. I stated that itGadgetArcrep wrote:I'm Going to Retract My Vote.Unvote
Things arent going nowhere here at the moment, and I need a lead here, there doesnt seem to be one at the moment, then again,I vote qwintsHe flip flopped too quickly by saying, and I quote.ok, my vote is serious now.
He says it like he had a reason even though he said it was random.
He just said he wasn't going to make a random vote. He can still participate if he finds something scummy. Its up to town to agree or disagree so I dont see where you're going with this one.qwints wrote:but you don't get to say "I'm going to sit out of the game until we find actual suspects." That's basically announcing your intention to actively lurk and it made me say that my vote was now serious
Because the action doesnt deserve a vote, let alone a lynch. You ain't being reasonable here and you could possibly be scum. I am rather contradicting someone I think to be scum rather than randomly defending a player (since thats no help towards finding scum)qwints wrote:This is not simply saying he's not going to voe. This is him saying he's not going to participate until "the serious voting start."falkomagno wrote:yeah....just advice me when the RVS stops, and the serious voting start...
Phily_EC, why are you defending him so fiercely so early?