Mini 1830 - Game Over

gerryoat · Post Post #2100 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 1:55 pm

In post 2097, House wrote:Manuel/mal, the fact Huntress was at L-1 for so long and unhammered should tell you she's scum.

Town has to work together at this stage in the game to lynch scum because they're in full on survival mode and won't be bussing.

So how does that = voting me?

House · Post Post #2101 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 1:57 pm

In post 2100, gerryoat wrote:
In post 2097, House wrote:Manuel/mal, the fact Huntress was at L-1 for so long and unhammered should tell you she's scum.

Town has to work together at this stage in the game to lynch scum because they're in full on survival mode and won't be bussing.
So how does that = voting me?

It doesn't. Me voting you is because you're the likeliest partner of Huntress and my willingness to work with town.

If you want to come back to the light side and lynch scum, I'll follow you onto her wagon.

gerryoat · Post Post #2102 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 1:58 pm

What happens if she flips town?

gerryoat · Post Post #2103 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 1:58 pm

Cause right now, I'm scared that if she is lynched and flips town I will be lynched and we lose.

House · Post Post #2104 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 1:59 pm

In post 2102, gerryoat wrote:What happens if she flips town?

If she flips town, mal has to be scum and the last is between you and CCC as the only non-scumcleared townread I have.

gerryoat · Post Post #2105 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:00 pm

Okay, can you unvote at least while I think.

House · Post Post #2106 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:02 pm

UNVOTE:

gerryoat · Post Post #2107 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:03 pm

Can someone tell me if there is always 3 mafia in this setup with this many people? or is it possible there is only 2.

House · Post Post #2108 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:05 pm

In post 2107, gerryoat wrote:Can someone tell me if there is always 3 mafia in this setup with this many people? or is it possible there is only 2.

With three PR's (no matter who you believe), 2 scum would be incredibly underpowered especially when one already flipped goon.

gerryoat · Post Post #2109 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:05 pm

If Huntress is mafia, then I don't know who can be partner. idk if gamma would be partners with her, but I won't rule it out. I don't think Huntress and CCC are partners unless they both bussed.

gerryoat · Post Post #2110 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:07 pm

The reason I think mal is town is because what gamma said and was setting up, so

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2111 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:08 pm

@gerry you're a dumbass. Did you not play Mini Normal 1832?

gerryoat · Post Post #2112 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:10 pm

In post 2111, Gamma Emerald wrote:@gerry you're a dumbass. Did you not play Mini Normal 1832?

OH RIGHT LOL. So it is possible for there to be only 2 maf.

House · Post Post #2113 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:10 pm

In post 2109, gerryoat wrote:If Huntress is mafia, then I don't know who can be partner. idk if gamma would be partners with her, but I won't rule it out. I don't think Huntress and CCC are partners unless they both bussed.

I honestly don't know how you can read my d2 play and think you'd want me around another day if you were scum named Gamma.

1) Hate all you want, i was a driving force behind two lynches.
2) I'd been pressuring Gamma ALL DAY
3) Grendel and I made a pact to slaughter him d3
4) Grendel lamented d2 that he lacked the ability to lead lynches

That makes him the perfect kill to set the dogs of war upon Gamma the following day.

gerryoat · Post Post #2114 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:11 pm

Gamma, if you're town, which I still doubt, but still. I've read you wrong before, so it's possible I'm wrong here. Can you unvote. Tell me why you think Huntress is maf

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2115 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:12 pm

In post 2112, gerryoat wrote:
In post 2111, Gamma Emerald wrote:@gerry you're a dumbass. Did you not play Mini Normal 1832?
OH RIGHT LOL. So it is possible for there to be only 2 maf.

And how many town PRs were there?
3.

gerryoat · Post Post #2116 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:16 pm

In post 2115, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2112, gerryoat wrote:
In post 2111, Gamma Emerald wrote:@gerry you're a dumbass. Did you not play Mini Normal 1832?
OH RIGHT LOL. So it is possible for there to be only 2 maf.
And how many town PRs were there?
3.

okay, okay. as I said i you're town can you unvote and explain to me why huntress is mafia

House · Post Post #2117 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:16 pm

In post 2114, gerryoat wrote:Gamma, if you're town, which I still doubt, but still. I've read you wrong before, so it's possible I'm wrong here. Can you unvote. Tell me why you think Huntress is maf

You're not in hammer range.

gerryoat · Post Post #2118 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:17 pm

I still want him to explain to me why huntress is mafia

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2119 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:18 pm

I think Huntress is mafia because she tiptoed around my wagon and now that I reflected on it, her Day 1 play seems kinda suspicious as well.

gerryoat · Post Post #2120 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:18 pm

What was bad about her day 1? She subbed in so I think she was rereading. Which is why I gave her the benefit of the doubt.

House · Post Post #2121 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:21 pm

In post 2120, gerryoat wrote:What was bad about her day 1? She subbed in so I think she was rereading. Which is why I gave her the benefit of the doubt.

I had a suspicion that GreenNope was scum a and offered to replace into that slot first due to my preference for playing scum.

Don't ask me why I thought that, just a, "ding ding ding! ME WANT" for the slot as I was following the game.

gerryoat · Post Post #2122 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:23 pm

Oh right I forgot you were a sub too. Why did you think they were scum?

House · Post Post #2123 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:24 pm

In post 2122, gerryoat wrote:Oh right I forgot you were a sub too. Why did you think they were scum?

Lol.

The flake, mostly. Struck me as a "shit, scum" thing to ditch the game like that.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2124 (ISO) » Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:27 pm

In post 345, Huntress wrote:
Vote: CCC

My other scum reads at the moment are eager and gamma, with Rhaz/House a little lower.

I originally defended her on this, but this looks really lazy.

In post 444, Huntress wrote:
In post 346, House wrote:Please explain eager and Gamma?
I'll dig out the detail on these tomorrow. I haven't had time to do it today.

In post 347, House wrote:Also, why a vanity vote on CCC instead of voting me if I'm among your scum reads?

I'd have expected a case if you were going to seriously vote CCC instead of joining my wagon.
Hardly a vanity vote to vote my top read at this stage of the Day. Why should I vote you when I had stronger reads?

In post 354, Gamma Emerald wrote:I'm a little curious about why Huntress scumreads me, but I don't really think that was something I had to say out loud.
Why not?

In post 390, eagerSnake wrote:Huntress, are you fully caught up?
I was fully caught up when I posted yesterday. I still need to do some meta reads though, and follow up on some stuff.

In post 420, CCC wrote:Might I ask why?
I'll explain tomorrow as I haven't had a chance to do it today.

First part: looks like scum trying to stall to make up a badly made read.

In post 750, Huntress wrote:My read on eager is mainly a gut read but I'll try to pin it down a bit.

Eager's posting felt off from his very first post. Most people who want to do something other than rvs to start discussion just do it. Eager made a point of drawing the players attention to what he was doing. He was too quick to call Gamma town in 70, especially in view of his statement that he starts with the assumption that everyone is guilty until proved innocent. I didn't like the second part of 80. If he thought Victor might be town with an ulterior motive then he should have waited to see what came of it rather than point it out. Either way it would have been better to wait for Victor's explanation first. His vote on Square in 600 was for an extremely flimsy reason. It was also for something that Manuel did, not Square. He's throwing the words "doubtcasting" and "WIFOM" around far too much and adding distracting stuff like 697.

Vote: eagerSnake

Yet again, feels like something scum would easier perceive in their buddy.