alexhans wrote:
GIEFF: Town
jammer: Town
Benmage: Almost town
Zach: neutral, leaning town
SpyreX: neutral, leaning town
DDD: neutral. leaning Scum
bcc: neutral, leaning scum
Sensfan: neutral, leaning scum
KMD: neutral, Leaning Scum.
BM: scum
I know there can't be that much scum... But I'm not really sure who is really scum. BCC, I have no reads but Kai's exit + gut makes him look scum. DDD's lack of scumhunting is scummy. KMD's attitude towards Camn is scummy. KMD's play so far is scummy. SensFan is anti-town to the max. He may be hiding behind his meta.
(Colouring mine)
Why is Kai's exit a scumtell? Gut won't fly.
I pretty much agree on DDD, but again, lack of posting isnt really enough to lynch at this point. I agree on Sensfan hiding behind his meta. Not sure what to make of him atm.
Wanna elaborate on your KMD suspicion?
Alex wrote:
We need some BCC, DDD and SensFan input ASAP
Why do you want more input from 3 people who you think are more likely than not to be scum?
Alex wrote:
We have 3 scum in that 5 person pool.
Why 3? And whats with the confidence? I've seen cops with more caution than you! I doubt you consider your scumhunting to be THAT impeccable.
Alex wrote:
We have at least 2 more lynches. So there's no way we can fail to lynch scum. But we should try to lynch right today. I'm very confident BM is the right lynch. I'm gonna think a bit about pairings but I'm not sure how much can I trust that.
Thinking about pairings is a good idea. But i'm a terrible lynch. You should just NK me and be done with it. In fact, if you're town, i bet good money that if you stopped attacking me for 1 day, i'd be killed that night. So, thanks. xD
Alex wrote:
-------------------------------
GIEFF:
What do you think about your Camn+Alex theory now?
GIEFF wrote:Newly-humbled GIEFF is going to take a backseat now to try to avoid way too many pages of text or steering the town in the wrong direction.
Good. That will be healthy for the game.
You HAVE to be kidding me. You think we need LESS participation!? 0.o
Also, ^ Motive for Alex-scum to kill Camn.
[quote-"Alex"]
GIEFF wrote:
I do not consider myself the most threatening player in the game. I think the reason I was not killed is that so many people find me scummy.
And probably because your massive rain of posts pulled this game into a bloody confusion that helps scum.[/quote]
This is a terrible stance. I know you won't take anything i say seriously at this point, but for future reference, you should heed well- High levels of posting like we have seen in this game is PROTOWN. Simple spam is NOT. But posting here is actually productive-for those of us who are playing, anyway.
Alex wrote:
Battle Mage (this is all for you)
:
Woop Woop! xD
Alex wrote:
BM wrote:Humorous that you attack me for the Quicklynch, when i...wasnt even on the wagon. -.-
I didn't vote you for that waggon. I vote you because you're scum and you supported a quicklynch but tried to stay off it...
My comment to Gieff needs amending to you. Because clearly i can't expect the same level of rationality from you as town. Suffice to say, my play regarding the Ceph wagon cannot be attributed a scum motive. I'm pretty sure your vote on me is just because, for the last 40 pages, you cant be bothered to actually analyse this game. There isnt anything i can say to change your mind, so tell me-what's the point us even talking?
You need to open your eyes, comrade.
Alex wrote:
BM wrote:The problem with this game is, more than 50% of the players are good policy lynches at this point,
Bullshit. Stop talking like SensFan. There's no GOOD policy lynches. We have to lynch scum not people that we dislike for some reason.
A policy lynch in this case is not somebody i dislike. It's somebody that hasnt committed conventional scumtells, but we can't really deal with, and we certainly dont want to give a victory to. Lurkers like Ceph and BCC fitted that category for most people. Sensfan fits it, because he's hiding behind a scummy meta, and we cant get a read on him. You fit it, because you've been
worse
than useless, and aren't participating in anything remotely like a protown manner. DDD also fits it, for active lurking, and displaying an open willingness to participate the bare minimum.
Sometimes SensFan talks a lot of sense, i guess.
Alex wrote:
BM wrote:Camn getting killed is an absolute God-send, because she was both a policy-lynch, and a scummy player, who we now won't waste a mislynch on.
IIRC, you said she was town...
Really? I recall my public stance being pretty torn. In any case, i looked at the game in a different light overnight-hence my changing opinion on Zach.
Alex wrote:
regarding GIEFF's performance... there's 2 choices... he is scum... or he is town and is hurting the town with his enormous quantities of posts where he just tunnel visions on someone and keeps trying to find reasons to call them scum. I think the latter.
I don't even want to dignify the last bit with a response. I suspect Gieff will probably punish you accordingly. How can YOU call somebody on tunnel-visioning? lmfao
And, frankly, your list above, had Gieff in the "certain town" category. So why are you sounding less confident now?
Alex wrote:
BM wrote: I was one of the prime lynch pushers
, and i wasnt even voting for Cephrir by the end of the Day.
Wich is inconsistent... Why did you derail the bcc waggon but then didn't take responsability for the Cephir one?
Did you not read what you quoted? I'll highlight it for you.
That's me taking responsibility. What's your prob?
Alex wrote:
BM wrote:The Camn NK clearly implicates Gieff.
This is bs. You're night speculating when you voted Mastin for it.
Night speculating on Night 0 is foolish. Night speculating on a player whose presence was dominated by another, is perfectly reasonable. Whether Gieff committed the kill or not, is to be determined. But, the obvious conclusion we are expected to draw is that he did, or scum want us to think he did. I was leaning towards the former, but hearing from you and Benmage has swayed me back to the latter.
Alex wrote:
1508: shows why you're scum. Now you say that the Cephir vote had evidence that indicated he was scum?
Would be helpful if you quoted 1508. Anyway, i said at the time my Cephrir vote was a well-reasoned one. If you were following yesterday, you would know this. Why do you find it surprising now?
Alex wrote:
And you call Camn scummy NOW?
Yep. But, again, i'm pretty sure i voiced my doubts on her yesterday as well. I'm not the master at this game, and i'm not afraid to admit when i'm wrong. I was wrong to doubt Camn. But not as wrong as the Mafia were for NKing her. xD
Alex wrote:
And VP Baltar obv town? This is all designed to make you look good.
You do realise that Camn was town? And so was Cephrir? How does me thinking they could both be scum, correspond with me being CORRECT about VP Baltar?
I seriously doubt you even know what you are arguing anymore. You're just twisting anything you can to try and make a case, however illogical. But you give me lol's, i guess. It's just frustrating when i think you might be town, and if so, i honestly dont know what we can do with you...
Alex wrote:
Do you realize that scum can buss each other? If you do... then you'll see that anti-pairing is not so effective.
Which Anti-Pairing?
Alex wrote:
BM wrote:Ben - What do you reckon we should do with Alex?
Huh? Are you looking to see if you have support for a mislynch?
Yeh, thats right. You got me.
I think, if you're town, you getting lynched is the second best thing you can do for your chances of winning.
Alex wrote:
Why do you keep asking who does the kill implicate when we all know that scum has 100 % control over it? Didn't SensFan and DDD said that? Didn't you agree? Why do you use it when it's convinient to you? (That was rethorical, the answer is because you're scum)
Lmao. I don't really see what you're getting at here. Firstly, you were pro-kill speculation. Secondly, how does scum having control over the kill mean we cant speculate? :S
Alex wrote:
BM to GIEFF wrote:Just me? And i'm town. So, from my PoV, it's unlikely that the Camn-kill was to implicate you, given nobody has bothered to follow it up. But, i can understand a level of concern from yours.
Note also, that despite your anxious reaction to my comments on you, you arent my 1st of 2nd lynch candidate atm. Why would i have made a fuss of killing Camn last night, if i didnt really intend to pursue you straight afterwards - which would obviously be optimal.
It's amazing how you try to look town and buddy GIEFF in every post but still want others to pick on what you say and make him look scummy.
--------------------------------
Why do you draw a parallel between "looking town" and "buddying Gieff"?
Seems like you might be referring to your own play here. Iirc, this post started with you claiming that Gieff was definitely town.
I'm not interested in a Gieff-lynch at this point. Nor do i really want an Alex-lynch. I actually just want you to stop posting.
Ftr, i think you might confuse me "trying to look town" with me "actually being town". Just a thought. lol
BM