I still think 5 electors per faction for 25 total is the best route
THIS POST IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
Titles are social, mods shouldn't be the biggest faction, shitposters and social fixtures should be, I still think my original proposal is the correct balance
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
THIS POST IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
THIS POST IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
In post 1360, Annadog40 wrote:Could also divide users instead by year they joined. Would be more simple.
But I'd be in different groups depending on your time zone
THIS POST IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
No, we need to go the opposite direction. We need to bring back the Title Fairy attitudes of old. The ones who didn't go out of their way to create elaborate tiered discussion and waiting periods or encourage a lot of input from scummers to appease or keep popularity
We need a Title Fairy who will rule with an iron fist and is the sole arbiter who what makes a good title or not.
THIS POST IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
“Trust is an orchid, beautiful but delicate, requiring ideal conditions in order to thrive. Without them, it dies.” - Dahrk (Arrow, Season 4)
---
"-grey- would hardclaim an inno on his obv-scum partner D2 in a micro if he could" - gigabyteTroubadour
"You type like a Bond villain." - DogWatch
You know, it occurs to me that, technically, psyche's poll on who should get to keep their April Fool's titles is the equivalent of people actually voting for those titles. You could argue that everyone who gets at least five votes, then, should have their title reviewed as per usual and approved or rejected as appropriate. Whadya think?
"As everyone knows there is a special guardian angel for drunkards and lovers"
No, because people have been actively campaigning for votes which goes against the process.
“Trust is an orchid, beautiful but delicate, requiring ideal conditions in order to thrive. Without them, it dies.” - Dahrk (Arrow, Season 4)
---
"-grey- would hardclaim an inno on his obv-scum partner D2 in a micro if he could" - gigabyteTroubadour
"You type like a Bond villain." - DogWatch
In post 1368, ConManMick wrote:You know, it occurs to me that, technically, psyche's poll on who should get to keep their April Fool's titles is the equivalent of people actually voting for those titles. You could argue that everyone who gets at least five votes, then, should have their title reviewed as per usual and approved or rejected as appropriate. Whadya think?
if we take the analogy too far, i should reject the titles i think are mediocre, which i think are nearly all of them
In post 1368, ConManMick wrote:You know, it occurs to me that, technically, psyche's poll on who should get to keep their April Fool's titles is the equivalent of people actually voting for those titles. You could argue that everyone who gets at least five votes, then, should have their title reviewed as per usual and approved or rejected as appropriate. Whadya think?
if we take the analogy too far, i should reject the titles i think are mediocre, which i think are
“Trust is an orchid, beautiful but delicate, requiring ideal conditions in order to thrive. Without them, it dies.” - Dahrk (Arrow, Season 4)
---
"-grey- would hardclaim an inno on his obv-scum partner D2 in a micro if he could" - gigabyteTroubadour
"You type like a Bond villain." - DogWatch