Nightson said his restriction was a seventh level secret and that I hadn't coughed up the money yet. Kirbyphreak wondered if Nightson was scum, and said it would be more likely that the first dog would be scum, strictly by the logic of conflicting claims. He then voted Nightson. He said he would wait to see the effects of small furde before taking any for himself.
Bertrand said we should lynch the dog, not thinking we'd get anything better. Ubertimmy wondered about scientology and the badness of cults, then voted for Nightson. He then commented that bertrand seemed not to be adhering to any restriction, unvoted, and voted for him.
Nightson then said he was in a cult of one, and that if he gets up to lynch -1, he knows how many scum are voting for him. Shadowlurker called him an idiot for claiming. Nightson said he made it all up, and that no one knows what his role and restriction are.
Oberon claimed to sit in some small furde. TWN tried to clarify, saying he would be prouder of a win as cult than town, comparing it to an SK win. Oberon agreed with this sentiment. Twomz voted for Bertrand, and then said if Nightson slipped up any more, he'd never act in this town again.
Nightson wondered what would happen if he made other people slip, and got a barrel of banana peels. MoS commented that bertrand's restriction seems to be subtler than pikachu.
Oberon suggested we try and nail down everyone's restriction. MoS wondered what we could do in cases where someone can't assert in the face of possible contradiction what their PR really is.
Oberon wondered if that meant people like him, and claimed to
not have
a post restriction, and that he didn't want to reveal anything for fear of being nightkilled.
Twomz said that restrictions are likely to be simple, and that if someone is caught in a lie about their restriction, they're probably scum. He suggested that even if someone only has to do something a certain number of times a day, they should do it constantly.
Oberon wondered if we would make a list, and Bertrand agreed with the idea. He then said to lynch the dog.
Small furde man praised small furde, commented on Oberon's lack of restriction, but did note that there was a precedent for it, in the first game. He then FoSed Bretrand, and voted for Twomz, seeing that post as instructions for scum.
Ether reminded everyone that bertrand's innocence had already been cleared, and asked m4yhem to clarify the code he's using.
ShadowLurker acknowledged the mistake, unvoted, and voted smashy. Bertrand misspelled small furde, and said simply 'burn'. Oberon said he sat in the small furde. Small furde man said this would only make sitting more pleasurable, and said bertrand should not incur the wrath of small furde.
MoS wondered about the size of the furde.
As for me, I'm not against getting everyone's restrictions out in the open. The fact that Oberon claims not to have a restriction makes me a bit nervous-- the fact that it happened in the first game would cause me to be inclined to think that it wouldn't happen again.
I still want more clarification on Nightson's. Bertrand is, despite acting like a jerk a lot, already confirmed town, so voting him isn't much help.
).
