CJ wrote:And my point stands, if someone else is acting anti-town and most people agree on this, (and you too possibly), but think he is mafia, you are saying you wouldn't place a vote down on them because they 'aren't cult'?
That is obviously NOT what I'm saying. I am voting for mafia now. Since you either can't follow what I posted or are intentionally distorting, I'll make it simpler.
I am currently voting mafia. I would rather vote cult than mafia right now.
...srsly...didn't think this would be difficult for you to understand since you voiced the same opinion Day 1...
CJ wrote:With a Red Lantern down I'd rather take out the probable Cult Recruiter first
To more directly answer your question, I would vote for another player if I thought he was acting anti-town. For instance, if most people agree you are scum-mafia (and I agree with that), then I would definitely place a vote down on you.
If most people (read: you and your second head) think that muffin is scum (and I disagree), then I wouldn't place a vote on him
because he isn't scum
.
------
To Friend and GW: If I understand right, you suspect WLC as cult because:
(1) He hasn't posted much
(2) He attacked the idea that WL are anti-Cult
Is that the bulk of the argument? I see some merit to the second one, but I don't see the first one. Actually, my statement is imprecise; while he hasn't posted much, his posts Day 1 gave me a feel that he was actively participating, but probably overwhelmed by sheer post volume, and that he actively took a position in gunning for ooba's lynch. I feel like a cult player wouldn't be actively gunning for a lynch unless he had information to warrant such behavior.
------
Reviewing the low post players, I actually think Blackberry is more guilty of both offenses. I suggest you read through his post history; he begins with questioning Nikanor, he points out the Uncultable vs Unrecruitable role descriptor (could indicate he is interested in cult hunting, or could indicate he's cult and wants to know what he's up against), he fence sits regarding Nik vs Toast, but continues to post to discredit Nik (though admittedly, his criticisms are spot on). He contributes little content, and takes no official stances, while at the same time adding fuel to Toast and myself who had both voiced criticism of Nik's fake gambit, while keeping himself distanced. That rings to me as a non-commital cult-like play. Also, his criticism of Mr. S's gambit.
Peregrine's *3 posts* also worries me, especially as his justification for voting WLC is that WLC voted Mr. S
the Entity
, and he didn't remove that vote after Mr. S revealed that it was a fake gambit. I think there's a good chance peregrine is cult, fake cult-hunting, and happy to push the WLC wagon.
That in mind,
Unvote, Vote: Blackberry
My updated list:
Town:
Nik
Muffin
Friend
Hiplop
Nopoint
Toast
Mr. S
Mafia:
Andy
CJ
Vezok
SK:
?
Cult:
Blackberry
Peregrinne