Streetflow wrote:
Actually, stuff makes more sense now. Porochaz is a tracker of some sort, so he has some information we don't have or he saw why the message from Xiao was suspicious based on personal ingenuity. Cicero didn't act night 1 (assuming he has a role as a resurrector) because there was not anyone to resurrect yet - we don't know his alignment though.
I'm noticing a pattern of you posting without reading over your posts. Streetflo (you spelled his name wrong) never said this, QF did.
cicero wrote:Occult wrote:cicero wrote:Sorry Occult, I'm not buying it. You can either cover over a townie's mistake or you can exploit it. You chose to exploit it.
Like you covered Poro's Mistake?
This is how you played the Poro situation, bitch (I'm just using Bitch as a form of punctuation in this case).
Porochaz said "That quote is wrong, I think it's from scum based on something only I know". This is fundamentally different from me responding to a point speculating on resurrection with speculation on resurrection. That situation invited probing because it articulated a falsifiable conclusion. Mine did not. Here, let me show it again:
Then you show one of your older posts (Its too long so I'm not going to keep it on here, read it on cic's post).
I'll give that one to you, it's a bit of a different situation (but not by much IMO).
Note the post was made in the context of a discussion of why it might be important to know whether the writer was lying or not, which was premised on us making sure we didnt get tricked into possibly resurrecting the wrong person, which is what the writer was asking us to do if possible. I simply respond. And you look up and point and then when I deny it, you point again louder.
My situation is different then yours, for my night actions to best benefit the town, I need to know whats going on, so I'm going to probe into and read between the lines of everyone's post. I'm also going to be aggressive as hell to get it done.
Now - the second half of your paragraph is irrelevant. I already had a target on my head by that point. People were beginning to speculate about me being a resurrector.
No, they weren't. It is relevant.
My answer (and one of the main reasons I claimed):
See that there? You did that there.
Occult wrote:Cicero wrote:With respect to the first half, if you read it in context with the note we got from the beyond which postulated about the existence of a resurrector.
No it said IF, it does not explicitly state a resurector role.
Exactly, and yet from me discussing resurrection you leaped to the idea that I had to be it and said so. I didnt say I was the resurrector. At best I said something assuming there might be one. And you had to pipe up with a completely unnecessary "Cicero, did you just soft claim?". Sadly with the role name "anubis" things got a little obvious to people from then on. [/quote]
You soft claimed to me, I read into it and saw a slip up in your words. You can't say I was wrong, b/c I nailed you.
We also have a speaker for the dead and dead players able to continue to play the game through him. So on what planet would we NOT talk about a resurrector? But that doesn't change anything. You could have let the "error" slide or you could have made damn sure there was a target on my head and this is what you did:
A Way to speak through a medium didn't definably mean a chance to be resurrected.
Course not. Yet you were damn sure what my role was. And damn sure you were going to make sure everyone knew it. You're being disingenuous, "bitch". Nothing I said was definitive but you did a "target: lock on: resurrector".
That's just facts.
I was positive due to your slip up, plus your name and then you add on Poro's investigation and it was obvious.
Disingenuous? No, I don't believe I am. A bitch? Yes. Yes I am, I've been forced within the last week to wake up during ungodly hours (to me, I'm a night person) for work, and I've been posting in this game in a bad mood (I've been taking my anger out on you and spelling mistakes).
Don't get too upset with me using bitch, I use that word in obscene quantities, regardless of situation.
Finally, as much as I've liked this little tennis match we got going here 'm not being sarcastic) we've allowed some people (the ones I happen to find the scummiest) a chance to lurk and I'd like to hear from them.