Open 180 - 3 of 5 / Out in the Wilde (Game Over!)

[Nikanor]

Vote Count 1.4

MrSuave (3)

- hohum, DeathSauce, dramonic

dramonic (1)

- saberwolf

hohum (1)

- MrSuave

Not Voting (4)

- malpascp, Alduskkel, Santos, Trumpet of Doom

With nine players alive, five votes are required to lynch.

Negotiable Deadline falls on November 12 at 01:00 UTC

[DeathSauce]

My response to post 83 is that scum love policy lynches because it gives them a great way to camouflage themselves. Starting a "lynch all lurkers" wagon is one thing, but this attempt to start a wagon by Suave is bizarre. Promoting a meta-game policy lynch when there hasn't even been any evidence of the so-called meta in this game (IMO) just screams "scum" to me.

And responding with "Durrr" is not exactly what I would call an eloquent defense.

I'm happy with where my vote is.

[Alduskkel]

I don't see the scum motivation behind it.

And where is malpascp?

[Alduskkel]

To elaborate, I don't see why Mr. Suave would try to start a bandwagon that didn't look good to begin with.

[hohum]

Alduskkel: if you're Suave's scum partner you'd do better to bus him.

[hohum]

To add to that I don't like how he crated this shitstorm for himself and then he disappears.

@Mod: I think we need more prods

[saberwolf]

I'm fine with applying the pressure

unvote; vote: mr suave

that's L-1, so please claim.

[dramonic]

I'm not sure how credible PR claims are in this setup...

[saberwolf]

I'm not sure how credible PR claims are in this setup...

ah, I very much disagree, and I will explain why after I get my role claim from my dear friend mr suave

[Alduskkel]

Alduskkel: if you're Suave's scum partner you'd do better to bus him.

Nope -- just don't buy the case.

[Alduskkel]

And I noticed no one is responding to 103.

[saberwolf]

And I noticed no one is responding to 103.

peanut butter on toast is good too...

[Alduskkel]

As long as you have something to drink with it, too.
Are we just raising our PPDs then?

[saberwolf]

As long as you have something to drink with it, too.
Are we just raising our PPDs then?

that's just my way of saying the point is either irrelevent, or I have nothing to say on the matter.

[dramonic]

It's irrevelant. We can't read Suave's mind.

[Alduskkel]

As long as you have something to drink with it, too.
Are we just raising our PPDs then?

that's just my way of saying the point is either irrelevant, or I have nothing to say on the matter.

Do you think Suave is just that poor of a scum player?

[Alduskkel]

It's irrevelant. We can't read Suave's mind.

I think we need to look into

motivations

for actions. If there's no scum motivation then it's not a scum tell.

[saberwolf]

It's irrevelant. We can't read Suave's mind.

I think we need to look into

motivations

for actions. If there's no scum motivation then it's not a scum tell.

welcome to WIFOMland. Population: You

[Alduskkel]

It's irrevelant. We can't read Suave's mind.

I think we need to look into

motivations

for actions. If there's no scum motivation then it's not a scum tell.

welcome to WIFOMland. Population: You

Back to basics: a scum tell is something that raises the % chance of someone being scum. If there isn't a motivation for scum to do X, then they have no reason to do it. If a person does X then they didn't have a scum motivation for doing it. Therefore, it's at best a null tell.

I don't see why I even have to explain this.

[saberwolf]

Sometimes I don't have a motivation to pull a gambit, sometimes I just do it cause spontaneously it seemed like a good idea.

sometimes ppl post on here without thinking out what they were going to say. I tend to post on the fly myself. I'm just saying not everything requires an explantion of motivation. For some reasons it does, others it does not, otherwise we would never ever defend each other, as we wouldn't have the proper safety of knowledge to be motivated into doing so. Trying to outthink the scum, as well as announcing it, is just gonna lead to scu fucking with your head.

[Alduskkel]

Maybe it's a play-style difference then. I always have a motivation for saying something.

If you don't think there's a scum motivation behind Mr. Suave's actions, then why is it scummy?

[saberwolf]

Maybe it's a play-style difference then. I always have a motivation for saying something.

If you don't think there's a scum motivation behind Mr. Suave's actions, then why is it scummy?

you're talking to the wrong person for that question. I'm more of a gut n logic man. I either peg you off the bat with gut [as you yourself have seen before personally] or I use logic to work out scenarios and possibilities and %s. [also you have seen]. I let you guys do the psychoanalysis on each others posts while I take a rougher approach and look at the opposite. I can possibly show you what I mean after we get a claim. You'll see I'm more of a logical scumhunter than a deductional one.

[dramonic]

my personal experience with Suave-town doesn't look like this.

[Alduskkel]

my personal experience with Suave-town doesn't look like this.

How so?

[dramonic]

He really wasn't half as sheepish last time he flipped town.