Mike O' Malley wrote:Hi, I'm here.Vote: Scotmany
Mike O' Malley wrote:I like my vote. ^_^
Mike O' Malley wrote:Hi. Sorry for not being here, catching up later.
Forgot me already?The Jester wrote:Why BeepBeep? I know why Mike, but not sure on Beepbeep.
Actually, Mike hasn't really helped that much.
Vote: Mike
Not contributing, and a no reason vote on Scot.
I'm not sure on Scot from what Guardian has said, and I feel Mike seems more concrete then Scot.
About me you said this:The Jester wrote:Not contributing, and a no reason vote on Scot
So?The Jester wrote:Having secrets could mean a lot of things, are we to assume that the three NPCs that were dead didn't have secrets of their own? If Scot killed her, why? If we don't know, then voting him wouldn't be good.
I feel the most suspicious right now is Undo.
Reasons: Undo's "Why don't we massclaim, then?"
If Skruffs said based off flavor you'd likely be wrong, then why suggest mass-claim? Horrible idea, and giving mafia names to piece together some strategy? Later Undo even repeated what Skruffs said. So, why would he suggest mass-claim after knowing it would be unhelpful and actually hurtful?
You're not being pro-town.Undo wrote:What if I am curious to know the roles of everyone else?
Undo wrote:"Do you think it was really necessary to semi-claim like that?
Anyway, the flavour about Baxter Johnson you described matches mine somewhat, so my votes stays on scotmany12."
Scot posted above Undo 4 minutes before, so his post apparently didn't change his reasons for keeping his vote. "It matches mine somewhat" Yet a few minutes later you say.
Why would he unvote over that? Compared to Undo's strong reason to keep a vote, that made him unvote?Undo wrote:Just seen this. Made me hesitate.
Hmm... Unvote
I need to think about this better."
His vote post on Scot:
What was the strategy? I'm confused on this, it feels overdone, and he didn't show where Scot did these supposed things.Undo wrote:IMHO, scotmany12 is taking things too seriously. The purpose of votes and bandwagons in the early day 1 is mainly to gather information, not to immediately lynch scum. I don't like scotmany12 reaction, he is too worried with the sake of town, and he unnecessarily uses many 'insulting' words ("stupid", "retarded", "bullshit"). It really looks like scum trying to look townish. Like, 'Oh my God, a bandwagon is retarded and stupid, and it doesn't help the town at all. I am town, I want to help the town. No bandwagons, that's bullshit'.
It is a good strategy, scotmany12, but you used it too early.
Vote: scotmany12FOS: Undo
You were the first person to welcome when I replace in for pianogwen. How soon people forget me.neko2086 wrote:GHave we found a replacement for pianogwen, for instance?
I guess you have been gone a long time. Scot has claimed(or rather been called out). It's Yosarians claim that keeps changing every couple of posts. He can't make up his mind.Rosso Carne wrote:i really just feel like focussing on yossy's claim. even if he were to abandon it i wont, it seems solid. ill get a better read once scotty is forced to claim. kthx.
I did read it when it was going on since it was a fascinating and bizarre set-up, but that's the problem with that meta. It's such a different set-up, I'm not sure his behavior in that game is in any way telling of his usual playstyle. That is the only other game he's ever played, though, so there is no counterexample to say that you're wrong. He is lurking something fierce right now, so focusing on his play in this particular game, I would be inclined to agree with you.Beep! Beep! wrote:Meta on Mike: Read Worse Idea Mafia please. You can read the whole game in 3 minutes. He basically lurked his way to victory. Now, I'm not complaining, because he was, after all, my scumbuddy.
Therefore I'm particularly well placed to notice his lurkstrategy.
vote: Mike O'Malley- I'm on to you, Mike.
To me, it seems to be lacking some significant details. We do not know for sure what role Baxter(scot) played in the death of Marissa. We know he struck her on the head, and we know her car ran into a tree and she died while heavily intoxicated. There is aRosso Carne wrote: i really just feel like focussing on yossy's claim. even if he were to abandon it i wont, it seems solid. ill get a better read once scotty is forced to claim. kthx.
I was in this game and i can vouch for this ..Beep! Beep! wrote:Meta on Mike: Read Worse Idea Mafia please. You can read the whole game in 3 minutes. He basically lurked his way to victory. Now, I'm not complaining, because he was, after all, my scumbuddy.
Therefore I'm particularly well placed to notice his lurkstrategy.
vote: Mike O'Malley- I'm on to you, Mike.
Greasy Spot wrote:
I guess you have been gone a long time. Scot has claimed(or rather been called out). It's Yosarians claim that keeps changing every couple of posts. He can't make up his mind.