569 Adel's Nightmare -- Game Over!

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #175 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2008 4:09 pm

Nah, I'm going by process of elimination, because I believe some players to be town enough that I would not lynch them today.

I want to lynch you because I have found no reason to eliminate you as too townie to vote for.

Adel · Post Post #176 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:10 pm

the dead still include: Xiao (Guardian), Aborted Elephant (Ghostwriter), Sparky (Rigel), Cold Fairy (ChaosOmega)

˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚

votecount as of post 175

^{with 7 alive, 4 will lynch before deadline}
˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚

¬QuantumFruit

: 3 : roffman, DrippingGoofBall, cicero

Occult

: 1 : Porochaz

DrippingGoofBall

: 1 : QuantumFruit

roffman

: 1 : Occult

No Lynch

:

none

not voting

: 1 : Streeflo

˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚

Day 1's deadline is March 19th

QuantumFruit · Post Post #177 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:16 pm

@DrippingGoofball: Well, can you please tell me what you find scummy in my behavior? You haven't pointed out evidence. It seems like you're not putting much thought into this.

Also, please explain why you first jumped on Porochaz, then decided you were fine with lynching any of the following people and went on eliminating people as they posted (anything), and since I'd been gone, got stuck on me and now adamantly stuck to me even though I've been posting content and trying to figure out what exactly was scummy.

cicero · Post Post #178 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:30 pm

You really are new, QF. Just so you know, we all assume DrippingGoofball to be, largely, insane, and mostly right by accident.

Just so you're up to speed.

(not that I don't love you, DG. You know that I do.)

QuantumFruit · Post Post #179 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:49 pm

Well yeah, I am pretty new. Kinda seems like you're all good ol' buddies and ganging up on me.

See, in life and in mafia, I'm more of the try to construct serious, well-founded arguments type and I wanted to be 100% sure I understand everything. I kind of try to approach the game like a mathematician, I think. (I really am an old grump with everything, I've realized.)

cicero · Post Post #180 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2008 6:01 pm

Well listen - I would love nothing more than to give you the benefit of the doubt and go bug someone else, but logical arguments are based on truth before they ever get to validity and you had some trouble ascertaining the basic truth of your role pm when I did not. So if you cannot understand the basic fact that Adel waking up is the town goal of the game, how can I trust you? I've even had a jackoff from beyond the grave fuck that up...

Streeflo · Post Post #181 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2008 7:53 pm

QuantumFruit wrote:
DrippingGoofball wrote: I don't see QuantumFruit looking for scum. Let's lynch her.
Neither are you, you're just voting for whoever's a popular lynch vote at the time. And I am looking for scum, I just happen to think you're scummy.

This is ridiculous. Why is DrippingGoofball acting so obscenely scummy.

There must be a law somewhere about being "Too Scummy", just like being "Too Townie"...

cicero · Post Post #182 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:23 am

HEy DG. When they're right, they're right. You've just been going through the game crying for a lynch, any lynch.

Unvote. Vote Dripping Goofball.

You really gotta stop that.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #183 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2008 2:59 am

Sorry, but I can't. I'm off my meds again.

nah just kiddin' I'm all natural.

This game has lent itself to identifying scum by process of elimination. From the choice of nightkills, to the PM quotes, and the claims that fit with what I know, the process of elimination is the natural way to go in this game. I am left with only a couple of candidates that have not shown signs or proofs of town-alignment.

I'm not crying for "a lynch, any lynch" because I will absolutely not vote for the players I have eliminated from my little scum rat race. That's not "crying for any lynch" at all. Rather, it's the complete opposite. I have narrowed down the field quite a bit to a very few possible scum candidates.

cicero · Post Post #184 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:26 am

I dont see any tour de force of analysis behind your conviction, DG. Think you could use some quote boxes and do a big long post demonstrating the evidence for your convictions?

Porochaz · Post Post #185 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2008 2:31 pm

please voting you I have no objections to because I agree with streeflo and cicero. I will be totally up to speed on my games soon, I know its been only a couple of days (thats due to a few contributing factors) but decided the deadlined ones were the ones I should post in now and Ill get to the rest later on in the week.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #186 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2008 3:33 pm

cicero wrote:I dont see any tour de force of analysis behind your conviction, DG. Think you could use some quote boxes and do a big long post demonstrating the evidence for your convictions?

Yeah, I thought about doing this, but I stopped myself. If I make a solid argument for some player to be a townie, then they become a target for the scum. That's the problem when you have a game like this that lends itself to backward scumhunting.

cicero · Post Post #187 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2008 3:35 pm

We're all scum targets already. You still need to support your opinions. They're killing me tonight anyway.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #188 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2008 3:39 pm

cicero wrote:We're all scum targets already. You still need to support your opinions. They're killing me tonight anyway.

Good point. I'll try to do it tomorrow.

Porochaz · Post Post #189 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2008 3:50 pm

unvote

Porochaz · Post Post #190 (ISO) » Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:25 pm

mod can we get a prod on players who havent posted within the alloted non prodding time

Adel · Post Post #191 (ISO) » Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:09 pm

what are their names?

Porochaz · Post Post #192 (ISO) » Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:13 pm

Occult I guess checking the 72 hour rule... but if roffman could be included it would be useful, although I will ask in again in 24 hours if you say no.

Adel · Post Post #193 (ISO) » Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:14 pm

Sending a prod to occult.

cicero · Post Post #194 (ISO) » Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:29 pm

Hi! Up to deadline I would really like to ask people to

unvote. Vote Occult

I have a good feeling about lynching Hamas Rabbit. No guarantees. But I feel better about it than Streetflo or Quantum. And DG is... insane. (love you DG).

Occult · Post Post #195 (ISO) » Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:31 pm

cicero wrote:Hi! Up to deadline I would really like to ask people to
unvote. Vote Occult

I have a good feeling about lynching Hamas Rabbit. No guarantees. But I feel better about it than Streetflo or Quantum. And DG is... insane. (love you DG).

I like the reasonless vote you slid in there.

cicero · Post Post #196 (ISO) » Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:33 pm

The reasons are as far away as the drop down menu and you appearing when your name is called like Candyman in the mirror.

Occult · Post Post #197 (ISO) » Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:59 pm

cicero wrote:you appearing when your name is called like Candyman in the mirror.

Yes, I do like to do that sometimes.

roffman · Post Post #198 (ISO) » Mon Mar 17, 2008 7:08 pm

Hey all, i'm here. Personally, i'm up for a QF or DG lynch, though as the dead have yet to en-masse change their mind, my vote stands.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #199 (ISO) » Tue Mar 18, 2008 2:05 am

This is how I eliminated players:

Porochaz: claimed tracker. I believe. Confirmed by cicero.
cicero: weirdo claim that I'd normally lobby to lynch (especially the miller bit), but PM quote leads me to believe cicero is town.
roffman: fits the flavor in Adel's first few post. Not willing to lynch now.
Occult: seems to have role-based information on Poro. Not willing to lynch today.
Streeflo: PM matching - NOT ELIMINATED
QuantumFruit: - NOT ELIMINATED