Countdown of the Illuminati GAME OVER

Samruc · Post Post #6 (isolation #0) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:07 am

/confirm

Samruc · Post Post #49 (isolation #1) » Fri Mar 14, 2008 12:56 pm

Another reason not to stay at L-1 is that Mafia (or more unlikely SK) might risk a kill just to lower the amount of people needed for a lynch. This only applies when there is an even number of players alive (like today).

I'll check out the previous game as suggested.

Also,

vote: Max

. (Not purely a bandwagon vote.)

Samruc · Post Post #66 (isolation #2) » Sat Mar 15, 2008 7:09 am

Miztef wrote:...with no reasoning behind...

I thought I made it clear that there *was* reasoning behind my vote.

I also want more input from Max.

Samruc · Post Post #71 (isolation #3) » Sat Mar 15, 2008 7:57 am

Miztef: I *am* active and playing aggressively. I've never before skipped random voting, and I definitely haven't voted seriously within one day of daybreak... What I'm after in Max's posts will surely not appear if I tell you what I'm looking for. (This is not to say I'm not looking at other people as well.)

Samruc · Post Post #81 (isolation #4) » Sat Mar 15, 2008 9:11 am

^ Good post

Samruc · Post Post #126 (isolation #5) » Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:59 am

Max wrote:First I propose we kill the
serial killer
, if the 6 mafia die and 6 masons die in a row it would mean that
serial killer
would win with 5 risky kills in a rown, unlikely scenario but with every lynch away from the
serial killer
will result in a death.

My proposal, one lynch every week, the
serial killer
can only kill once a lynch or once every real life week, so we need to be quick, if we go past 7 days we should wait til day 13 before a lynch. If we go at that rate the game will be over reasonably quickly.

And finally, unlike most games you should never claim, ever, and it would be useles as masons would claim town, mafia would claim town and
serial killer
would claim town...

Also because the
serial killer
did not get a kill pregame it leads me to believe beepy beep beep is scum
Vote Beep!Beep![/]

This is why I'm voting Max.

***

armlx wrote:On top of neko, I don't like muffinhead's 180 from "How do I know who scum is?" to "Vote scumbag Max".

Also a very good point.

Samruc · Post Post #231 (isolation #6) » Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:39 pm

Guardian wrote:samruc, about as bad as flameaxe

Boo, I already pointed out the SK for you... And then I happened to be away for one day. I'm not arguing with the speedlynching tactic, it's obviously working, but we can't just lynch anyone who's gone for one day...

Lloyd: I was agreeing with DGB, did not like Miztef's post.

***

I still encourage people to vote Max for his excess use of the word "serial killer". (How would *you* react if you got the SK role PM? I'd go nuts...) I've seen this tell work before, and to me, it's worth one of our lynches.

Vote: Max

Samruc · Post Post #335 (isolation #7) » Wed Mar 19, 2008 10:45 am

People don't heed my warnings. I should have let Max ramble on a bit more about SK's this, SK's that. Now the cat is out of the box... The fact that I'm not dead might be an indication I'm on the right track though.

Albert has impressed me so far in the game, but I'm not feeling his case for DGB. I think she plays like she normally does...

Max, get back and post!

Samruc · Post Post #337 (isolation #8) » Wed Mar 19, 2008 11:07 am

Hm, explain what? The SK tell should be pretty obvious what I mean from my last posts, so I take it you mean the NK part.

My thoughts were, that if Max wasn't the SK, I might have been killed to frame him. Nabakov was a much safer kill, since he hadn't really put forward any suspicions. (This is kind of weak though if you don't believe him to be SK from the first part...)

Samruc · Post Post #346 (isolation #9) » Wed Mar 19, 2008 8:00 pm

DGB wrote:Why wouldn't the SK target player A that suspects player B, to frame player B?

He wouldn't if the SK = player B.

Samruc · Post Post #353 (isolation #10) » Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:10 am

Onbiously, Max-lynch won't happen today.

Unvote, vote: Neko.

I'll go for him as the last mafia.

Samruc · Post Post #355 (isolation #11) » Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:15 am

Two more.

Samruc · Post Post #521 (isolation #12) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:52 am

Gotta get going here again guys. I know I haven't been the most talkative, but I'm afraid to give scum too much info, and I haven't had very much to say.

Max is my prime suspect for SK. You know why.

Mafia, dunno, but right now I'd vote for Flameaxe. Or Miztef.

***

Vote: Max

. Max is the play.

Samruc · Post Post #545 (isolation #13) » Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:57 am

Uhm... Me don't likes.

The only accusations against me seem to be Guardian calling me antitown, which he doesn't seem to have proof for, and DGB finding my last post scummy. Dahill could also vote for me if someone else does. That's not much for a lynch IMO.

I'm not happy about a DGB lynch either... sigh.

Samruc · Post Post #597 (isolation #14) » Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:11 am

Apologies for the infrequent posting.

To say that I haven't had time to post here would be a lie, but my overall time for Mafia has been somewhat limited (school's back again), and I've tried to prioritize modding over playing.

From what I remember, my suspicions pointed to Max, but what I'd really need now is a read-through. This game is kind of difficult though, as everyone has incentive to downplay their respective roles.

If anyone could, like, ask me some specific questions, just to get me into the game again...

Samruc · Post Post #599 (isolation #15) » Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:55 am

Probably one of these guys:

Miztef
dahill1
Max
Albert B. Rampage
Flameaxe
neko2086

***

No, seriously, I'll try to take a look at the early days and get some thought into this game.

Samruc · Post Post #623 (isolation #16) » Sat Apr 05, 2008 3:59 am

I'm not the SK.

Seriously. While it's not conclusive evidence, I do have an argument for not being SK.

I don't want to use it yet though.

***

I've finally had a good reread. Neko is the most likely SK for me. There is plenty of proof that he is not a mason:

1) Look at Guardian's votes, Ooba's vote etc. Very unconsistent with how they treated other masons.
2) There is no living player that he could be paired with, if you look at it closely.
3) Several scum voted him too. This could mean nothing, but I'm pretty sure finding the SK was a distinct goal for scum too.

I know that there are three non-masons alive, which means lynching all of them won't be enough, but I'm convinced enough of this lynch.

Vote: Neko

Samruc · Post Post #625 (isolation #17) » Sat Apr 05, 2008 4:27 am

I don't think that post will make any mason reveal his identity. I have tried to word it as carefully as possible.

I think you have the highest potential of being SK, partly because of what I said above. I don't want to reveal my possible other candidates at this point.

Samruc · Post Post #627 (isolation #18) » Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:36 am

Wifom is good, probably even necessary, at this point.

Samruc · Post Post #630 (isolation #19) » Sat Apr 05, 2008 10:06 am

dahill1 wrote:at this point in the game, or at any point for that matter, it is not helpful to speculate who we think is a townie or mason. that information can only help the SK even more.

Every vote, heck, every single post is a possible clue to the SK. I'm doing what I can to cloud the issue here. There is a possibility the SK has already lost his risky kill ability, but until we know for sure, we'll have to play around the threat.