I'm feel the need to mention that I didn't advocate a nameclaim originally, and I didn't especially advocate one now. I simply have no problem with one, and won't accept poor reasoning against it. I say this because I feel like someone will try to blame me if something does go wrong, since it may appear that I'm arguing intensely for it.
vollkan wrote:
Para's reasons for the claim were fairly optimistic (the idea of scum appearing to mimic). I think it's probably more likely that a mass rolename claim would not have such a potent effect.
You say cicero convinced you, yet his arguments are just as pessimistic as mine are optimistic, if not moreso. I mean how likely is a role which can do something once they know your role name?(as cicero suggested)
vollkan wrote:
For that reason, the potential for a serious information leak that Cicero raises needs to take priority.
I'll bring up the point once again, but couldn't anybody whose name had to do with they're role simply tell us this? I don't get why people have to worry for them when we aren't sure they exist. Though I guess scum could lie and say their's did.(not that I'll assume that)
This rule 9.75 intrigues me, but the number of people who requested a bastardly game has made me extremely wary of trusting everything the Mod says. It's the best argument against a nameclaim so far, imo, but I'd still be willing to proceed.