Mini 574: Portal Mafia: HUGE SUCCESS

[Gorrad]

Unvote, Vote: Your Worst Nightmare

, what's with all the screaming?

I don't think L-3 is a big deal at all. Heck, knowing Flameaxe, I'd EXPECT it. That guy revels in latter-half votes.

[Your Worst Nightmare]

A fourth vote with 7 to lynch doesn't seem like a big deal to me. I couldn't see lynch-3 leading to an accidental lynch in this game. What do you mean by, "10 posts of actual game"? Nothing had actually happened, it was all random votes as far as I could tell.

I literally mean "10 posts made since the actual beginning of the game." And exactly because nothing had actually happened yet, exactly because they were all random votes, is the reason why so many votes on one person already is bad. A "oops, he got lynched" situation this early in the game is terrible for the town.

Why?

Because if you're not

thinking

pro-town, you won't

act

pro-town. And in such case, you may as well be mafia.

[Your Worst Nightmare]

Unvote, Vote: Your Worst Nightmare

, what's with all the screaming?

Re-check your Volume Control Device. No one is screaming here yet.

I don't think L-3 is a big deal at all. Heck, knowing Flameaxe, I'd EXPECT it. That guy revels in latter-half votes.

Exactly. I don't know Flameaxe. I don't know

any

of you. I am totally and completely un-biased. Hence, theoretically a better player.

[Flameaxe]

Unvote, Vote: Your Worst Nightmare

, what's with all the screaming?

Re-check your Volume Control Device. No one is screaming here yet.

I don't think L-3 is a big deal at all. Heck, knowing Flameaxe, I'd EXPECT it. That guy revels in latter-half votes.

Exactly. I don't know Flameaxe. I don't know

any

of you. I am totally and completely un-biased. Hence, theoretically a better player.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

UN-BIASED

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
AHAHAHAHAHAH
AHAHAHAHA
AHAHAHA
AHAHAH
AHAHAH
AHAH
AHAH
AHA
AH

That was funny. Really.

[Patrick]

A "oops, he got lynched" situation this early in the game is terrible for the town.

Yes it would be. Point is, I don't see this realistically happening. I don't think I could point to a single mini game where an early lynch-3 has let to an accidental speedlynch.

Because if you're not thinking pro-town, you won't act pro-town. And in such case, you may as well be mafia.

It could mean that person just has a different opinion to you on the early lynch-3 vote. I suppose it just seems odd to me to vote a person who doesn't buy it as a scumtell, rather than the person who dropped the (in your opinion) scumtell in the first place.

[Gorrad]

Unvote, Vote: Your Worst Nightmare

, what's with all the screaming?

Re-check your Volume Control Device. No one is screaming here yet.

I don't think L-3 is a big deal at all. Heck, knowing Flameaxe, I'd EXPECT it. That guy revels in latter-half votes.

Exactly. I don't know Flameaxe. I don't know

any

of you. I am totally and completely un-biased. Hence, theoretically a better player.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

UN-BIASED

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
AHAHAHAHAHAH
AHAHAHAHA
AHAHAHA
AHAHAH
AHAHAH
AHAH
AHAH
AHA
AH

That was funny. Really.

I laughed more about lack of metas making a better player. Also, joined in 2006 and 7 game posts? I'm calling alt here.

I feel fantastic about my vote.

[Flameaxe]

Unvote, Vote: Your Worst Nightmare

, what's with all the screaming?

Re-check your Volume Control Device. No one is screaming here yet.

I don't think L-3 is a big deal at all. Heck, knowing Flameaxe, I'd EXPECT it. That guy revels in latter-half votes.

Exactly. I don't know Flameaxe. I don't know

any

of you. I am totally and completely un-biased. Hence, theoretically a better player.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

UN-BIASED

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
AHAHAHAHAHAH
AHAHAHAHA
AHAHAHA
AHAHAH
AHAHAH
AHAH
AHAH
AHA
AH

That was funny. Really.

I laughed more about lack of metas making a better player. Also, joined in 2006 and 7 game posts? I'm calling alt here.

I feel fantastic about my vote.

That's kinda what I was hinting at...

[Gorrad]

Unvote, Vote: Your Worst Nightmare

, what's with all the screaming?

Re-check your Volume Control Device. No one is screaming here yet.

I don't think L-3 is a big deal at all. Heck, knowing Flameaxe, I'd EXPECT it. That guy revels in latter-half votes.

Exactly. I don't know Flameaxe. I don't know

any

of you. I am totally and completely un-biased. Hence, theoretically a better player.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

UN-BIASED

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
AHAHAHAHAHAH
AHAHAHAHA
AHAHAHA
AHAHAH
AHAHAH
AHAH
AHAH
AHA
AH

That was funny. Really.

I laughed more about lack of metas making a better player. Also, joined in 2006 and 7 game posts? I'm calling alt here.

I feel fantastic about my vote.

That's kinda what I was hinting at...

Ah. Sorry, My. Fancy Pants, I couldn't tell amongst all the laughing.

[Gorrad]

EBWOP: Mr. Fancy Pants.

[Flameaxe]

Still wearing jeans, Mr. Shorts.

[scotmany12]

You know, I didn't view the four votes on em as a big deal. They were all random and meaningless. I didn't find the four votes on me scummy at all.

[Incognito]

Explain?

Because placing a forth vote on someone (and keeping it) after

10

posts of actual game is already scummy in of itself (considering that 7 votes ends the day).

Not

finding that somewhat suspicious is scummier still.

I'm confused by what you're trying to say here as well. You entered the game, noticed that Flameaxe placed a fourth vote on scotmany12 (which is something that you have now adamantly declared as scummy), and instead of placing a vote on Flameaxe (your so-called scummy-acting player) you placed a random vote on Patrick. And then when I question Mach-Mafia about his comment and subsequent vote on Flameaxe, you place a vote on me for the reasons you've now provided?

Something about this chain of events doesn't jibe well.

That is the scummiest action I have seen thus far.

Mach-Mafia, what is so scummy about it? Why do you consider his vote to be so sneaky? He voted exactly the same way as anyone else would have voted and called someone a homo in the process. Calling someone a homo doesn't exactly constitute as "sneaky" behavior in my book. That seems more attention-grabbing than anything else.

[Machiavellian-Mafia]

:arrow: calling someone homo = non-game-related content

:arrow: non-game-related content = not as much attention paid to post

:arrow: not as much attention paid to post = sneaky

:arrow: sneaky + 4th vote = scummy

[Flameaxe]

Non-game related comment = Reasons for a jokevote day one? Yeah.

[Flameaxe]

Cake is most delicious, thus I must

Vote: Sir Tornado

Voting because cake is delicious = Scummy.

[populartajo]

What's the thinking behind this pair of FoSes?

Pretty simple. M&M is the first guy to vote for a reason. And Flameaxe, he knows I hate him.
Add Gorrard and Your Worst Nightmare to the list.
Also, unvote. My random powers are wrong.

[populartajo]

yeah, Im a newbie

unvote

[Flameaxe]

What's the thinking behind this pair of FoSes?

Pretty simple. M&M is the first guy to vote for a reason. And Flameaxe, he knows I hate him.
Add Gorrard and Your Worst Nightmare to the list.
Also, unvote. My random powers are wrong.

It's true. He hates me.

[Incognito]

What's the thinking behind this pair of FoSes?

Pretty simple. M&M is the first guy to vote for a reason. And Flameaxe, he knows I hate him.
Add Gorrard and Your Worst Nightmare to the list.
Also, unvote. My random powers are wrong.

It's true. He hates me.

You certainly have that affect on people.

[Flameaxe]

What's the thinking behind this pair of FoSes?

Pretty simple. M&M is the first guy to vote for a reason. And Flameaxe, he knows I hate him.
Add Gorrard and Your Worst Nightmare to the list.
Also, unvote. My random powers are wrong.

It's true. He hates me.

You certainly have that affect on people.

Yup.

[Sir Tornado]

unvote

[Your Worst Nightmare]

*obnoxiously large amount of 'haha's*

That was funny. Really.

GLaD I could brighten your day. Live to serve! :patriot:


Did I say anything wrong, though? If Gorrad already expects you to act scummy all the time, you can do whatever the crap you want, everybody will simply say "he does that all the time."
"What do you mean, Flameaxe is pointing a loaded gun at me? Naa, he's town! He does this all the time..."

I'm confused by what you're trying to say here as well. You entered the game, noticed that Flameaxe placed a fourth vote on scotmany12 (which is something that you have now adamantly declared as scummy), and instead of placing a vote on Flameaxe (your so-called scummy-acting player) you placed a random vote on Patrick. And then when I question Mach-Mafia about his comment and subsequent vote on Flameaxe, you place a vote on me for the reasons you've now provided?

Something about this chain of events doesn't jibe well.

When I voted for Patrick, I wasn't aware scotmany12 already had 4 votes on him. (Not exactly paying attention to such details that early in the game.) But when Machiavellian-Mafia brought that to everyone's attention and you questioned what was wrong with it, I just couldn't let it pass.

:arrow: calling someone homo = non-game-related content

:arrow: non-game-related content = not as much attention paid to post

:arrow: not as much attention paid to post = sneaky

:arrow: sneaky + 4th vote = scummy

Quoted for emphasys.

Also, joined in 2006 and 7 game posts? I'm calling alt here.

Well, you found me. Congratulations. Was it worth it? Because despite your violent behavior, the only thing you've managed to break so far is my heart. Maybe you could settle for that, and we'll just call it a day.

[Machiavellian-Mafia]

Non-game related comment = Reasons for a jokevote day one? Yeah.

You are helping my argument.

:arrow: Jokevote = not as much attention paid to post

[Incognito]

Unvote; Vote: Your Worst Nightmare

Not paying attention to that level of detail trumps not considering L-3 votes to be scummy in my book.

Also, unvote. My random powers are wrong.

I appreciate this but how do you already know that your random powers are wrong?

As an aside: We all do realize that we have two week deadlines in this game right? It would be nice to hear from some of the quiets.

[Miztef]

*obnoxiously large amount of 'haha's*

That was funny. Really.

GLaD I could brighten your day. Live to serve! :patriot:


Did I say anything wrong, though? If Gorrad already expects you to act scummy all the time, you can do whatever the crap you want, everybody will simply say "he does that all the time."
"What do you mean, Flameaxe is pointing a loaded gun at me? Naa, he's town! He does this all the time..."

I'm confused by what you're trying to say here as well. You entered the game, noticed that Flameaxe placed a fourth vote on scotmany12 (which is something that you have now adamantly declared as scummy), and instead of placing a vote on Flameaxe (your so-called scummy-acting player) you placed a random vote on Patrick. And then when I question Mach-Mafia about his comment and subsequent vote on Flameaxe, you place a vote on me for the reasons you've now provided?

Something about this chain of events doesn't jibe well.

When I voted for Patrick, I wasn't aware scotmany12 already had 4 votes on him. (Not exactly paying attention to such details that early in the game.) But when Machiavellian-Mafia brought that to everyone's attention and you questioned what was wrong with it, I just couldn't let it pass.

:arrow: calling someone homo = non-game-related content

:arrow: non-game-related content = not as much attention paid to post

:arrow: not as much attention paid to post = sneaky

:arrow: sneaky + 4th vote = scummy

Quoted for emphasys.

Also, joined in 2006 and 7 game posts? I'm calling alt here.

Well, you found me. Congratulations. Was it worth it? Because despite your violent behavior, the only thing you've managed to break so far is my heart. Maybe you could settle for that, and we'll just call it a day.

hmmm? I'd like to know what this is about (in blue). Are you being sarcastic? Are you actually an alt, if so, can you tell us who you are?

I do find Nightmare's claim that 4th vote = scummy as scummy. it's really not, and trying to prove otherwise seems detrimental.

Unvote, Vote: Your Worst Nightmare