Mini 554 - Mafia in Vollville - Over!!


User avatar
Incognito
Incognito
Not Rex
User avatar
User avatar
Incognito
Not Rex
Not Rex
Posts: 5953
Joined: November 4, 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Post Post #725 (ISO) » Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:12 pm

Post by Incognito »

ChaosOmega wrote:
Incognito wrote:Reading is tech.
What exactly do you mean by that?
vollkan wrote:Guardian,
Watcher
, was shot Night 1
I'm assuming you're an SK.


======================================================
Votecount #29

ChaosOmega - 3 (Erg0, Adel, Incognito)

Not voting - 6 (Matt_S, Oman, ChaosOmega, Xylthixlm, Patrick, Jitsu)

With 9 alive, it's 5 to lynch.
Deadline for D2: Friday April 5, 11:30AM GMT+10
================================================
User avatar
ChaosOmega
ChaosOmega
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
ChaosOmega
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2283
Joined: May 2, 2007

Post Post #726 (ISO) » Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:17 pm

Post by ChaosOmega »

I read it. I'm curious why the mafia would kill Guardian, when I thought a lot of his play Day 1 was very suspicious. In terms of sanity, it means I'm either insane or paranoid.
Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive, so nobody listens!
User avatar
Incognito
Incognito
Not Rex
User avatar
User avatar
Incognito
Not Rex
Not Rex
Posts: 5953
Joined: November 4, 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Post Post #727 (ISO) » Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:22 pm

Post by Incognito »

A sanity challenged cop in a mini-game?
[ooc][color=black]patrickgower2006 (8:12:03 PM): all beer tastes same to me
patrickgower2006 (8:12:07 PM): like dish water
If you see Patrick drinking dish water, please try and stop him. Friends don't let friends drink dish water.[/color][/ooc]
User avatar
Erg0
Erg0
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Erg0
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4157
Joined: February 25, 2007
Location: Secret Aussie.

Post Post #728 (ISO) » Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:23 pm

Post by Erg0 »

I doubt very much that you're paranoid, since that's still an information role (just reversed).

Overall, I'm unsurprised and unmoved - this is exactly the claimed result that I would expect from fakeclaiming scum in this situation. If you're an insane cop then you're
really
unlucky, because there's no way that I'm moving my vote based on that claim.
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
User avatar
Incognito
Incognito
Not Rex
User avatar
User avatar
Incognito
Not Rex
Not Rex
Posts: 5953
Joined: November 4, 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Post Post #729 (ISO) » Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:26 pm

Post by Incognito »

In addition to what Erg0 said, why not just come out and say something like - "I got a guilty on Guardian but since he turned up town, obviously I'm sanity challenged"? When you say it after I called you out about it, it basically looks like you're backtracking.
User avatar
Xylthixlm
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
User avatar
User avatar
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
!xmafia win
Posts: 5414
Joined: July 12, 2006

Post Post #730 (ISO) » Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:39 pm

Post by Xylthixlm »

Even I can figure out that ChaosOmega is probably scum here.

I say we wait for everyone to check in, then lynch him.
#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net

"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi
User avatar
Oman
Oman
NK Immune Miller Vig
User avatar
User avatar
Oman
NK Immune Miller Vig
NK Immune Miller Vig
Posts: 7014
Joined: June 19, 2007

Post Post #731 (ISO) » Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:40 pm

Post by Oman »

Vote ChoasOmega


I think we all know why.
It's unfortunate that good oral sex excuses bad chemistry. - Korts
User avatar
Incognito
Incognito
Not Rex
User avatar
User avatar
Incognito
Not Rex
Not Rex
Posts: 5953
Joined: November 4, 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Post Post #732 (ISO) » Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:41 pm

Post by Incognito »

A little hasty there...

Unvote


Not yet.
User avatar
Erg0
Erg0
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Erg0
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4157
Joined: February 25, 2007
Location: Secret Aussie.

Post Post #733 (ISO) » Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:02 pm

Post by Erg0 »

I think Jitsu's the only person we haven't heard from now.
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
User avatar
Oman
Oman
NK Immune Miller Vig
User avatar
User avatar
Oman
NK Immune Miller Vig
NK Immune Miller Vig
Posts: 7014
Joined: June 19, 2007

Post Post #734 (ISO) » Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:06 pm

Post by Oman »

Oh, damn. I was going to vote erg0.


Hmm...This disturbs me more, but if there is no other development, erg0 is next.
It's unfortunate that good oral sex excuses bad chemistry. - Korts
User avatar
Erg0
Erg0
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Erg0
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4157
Joined: February 25, 2007
Location: Secret Aussie.

Post Post #735 (ISO) » Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:09 pm

Post by Erg0 »

I do so love it when being right is treated as a scumtell. It was especially nice of the scum to make a point of setting me up with their nightkill.
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
User avatar
Oman
Oman
NK Immune Miller Vig
User avatar
User avatar
Oman
NK Immune Miller Vig
NK Immune Miller Vig
Posts: 7014
Joined: June 19, 2007

Post Post #736 (ISO) » Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:12 pm

Post by Oman »

I don't look at nightkills for scumtells. Its too easier to WIFOM.
It's unfortunate that good oral sex excuses bad chemistry. - Korts
User avatar
Erg0
Erg0
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Erg0
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4157
Joined: February 25, 2007
Location: Secret Aussie.

Post Post #737 (ISO) » Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:16 pm

Post by Erg0 »

Me neither (obviously), but I thought it was interesting that both of the players that I opposed lynching yesterday are now dead. Obviously opie was a communal decision, but I doubt that it was a coincidence that Guardian was killed last night (unless he was giving off power role tells that I missed).
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
User avatar
Adel
Adel
Crystalline Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Adel
Crystalline Logick
Crystalline Logick
Posts: 6743
Joined: May 23, 2007
Location: Central Oregon / High Desert

Post Post #738 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 3:59 am

Post by Adel »

I'm not liking the wifom noise that is comming from Erg0 right now.
User avatar
Incognito
Incognito
Not Rex
User avatar
User avatar
Incognito
Not Rex
Not Rex
Posts: 5953
Joined: November 4, 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Post Post #739 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:34 am

Post by Incognito »

Erg0 wrote:Me neither (obviously), but I thought it was interesting that both of the players that I opposed lynching yesterday are now dead. Obviously opie was a communal decision, but I doubt that it was a coincidence that Guardian was killed last night (unless he was giving off power role tells that I missed).
I don't understand why you feel this way, Erg0. It's not like you were the only one who was opposed to lynching Guardian yesterday. Why do you feel like this night-kill of Guardian was somehow used to set you and only you up?
User avatar
Jitsu
Jitsu
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Jitsu
Goon
Goon
Posts: 461
Joined: October 11, 2007
Location: Cary, NC

Post Post #740 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 5:31 am

Post by Jitsu »

Something's really wrong here, people.

We have three townies dead. If I'm reading the night scene correctly, the Mafia took out Guardian, and an SK took out PEG. Guardian was the "obvious" investigation target, since other than ChaosOmega (who would not investigate himself), and Opie, Guardian was the only one to get more than a couple of votes, I believe.

But here's the thing that bothers me most. Right after the day started and ChaosOmega declared Guardian guilty, ChaosOmega's wagon steamed off and put him at L-1 before Incognito unvoted. Day 2 is still only a few HOURS old (real time), and already we had someone get to L-1 with very little discussion?
NO! THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THE SCUM WANT!


In my opinion, we are focusing way too much on the cop claim right now. I suspect that Incognito is thinking the same thing I am -- the scum are trying to speedlynch ChaosOmega. This could be true regardless of CO's alignment. If CO is town, then the scum have a lynch without a lot suspicion. If CO is mafia, then they have cut loose their damaged goods and distanced themselves from a fakeclaim, while looking town in the process. If CO is the SK, well, then the mafia would have gotten rid of a threat they'd have needed to deal with eventually anyway. Regardless of the situation, a quicklynch would deprive the town of a lot of information. So a CO lynch is a win-win-win situation for the Mafia right now. That's why I want to put the brakes on it -- at least for now.

I'm not saying we shouldn't lynch ChaosOmega's today -- his claim is a little hard to believe at this point. But what's the hurry? He's not going anywhere, and we can always lynch him later today. If he really is the right play, then that should hold up after some significant discussion today. If he doesn't hold up, well, that tells us something too. I say we put ChaosOmega on the back burner for the moment and revisit him later today.

The other thing that ISN'T being discussed is the Opie wagon, which is something that we really should be talking about. Six people were on that wagon for a while at one point, keeping him at L-1 for some time. As far as I can see, seven of the players voted for Opie at some point after the random phase: Oman, ChaosOmega, PEG, Xylthixlm, Guardian, Adel, and Matt_S. Two of those players (Guardian, PEG) are now confirmed innocent (nothing is 100% in mafia, but this is probably as close to that as we can hope for). That leaves Oman, ChaosOmega, Xylthixlm, Adel, and Matt_S. The only people that did not vote for Opie after the random phase are Erg0, Patrick, Incognito, and myself. I'm still making up my mind about Erg0, but I feel that Patrick is probably town, and I'm leaning toward Incognito being town, especially after he unvoted to disrupt the speedwagon on ChaosOmega. Since I know I'm town, then that leads me to believe that Opie's wagon is where most/all of the scum were. Also, remember that Opie sat at L-1 for a long time without getting lynched. Meta says that we are dealing probably with SK + 2 or 3 Mafia here (i.e., 3 or 4 scum total).


@Adel: I want to hear that explanation you promised us yesterday, in regards to the Opie wagon and what you were thinking. I'd actually like to hear your opinions of all the remaining players.
User avatar
Patrick
Patrick
Rantbuddy
User avatar
User avatar
Patrick
Rantbuddy
Rantbuddy
Posts: 7475
Joined: May 3, 2006
Location: England

Post Post #741 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 6:07 am

Post by Patrick »

Ok. So if ChaosOmega is a cop, he's either insane or paranoid. Assuming there's no other cop claim, does anyone know whether vollkan is a bastard mod type of guy? Having a single non sane cop in any game is very very rare, I'm not sure I've even seen a case of it happening. ChaosOmega choosing to claim so close to deadline looks terrible for him; he knew when the deadline was, and it looks entirely too convenient that he claimed when he did, at a time when scum would obviously want to do it as a last minute confusion tactic. If he's legit, that's awful play, as is the rest of his play in general. Investigating Guardian is plausible for him to have done as cop, but that's about the only thing going for him.

I don't really think Guardian was killed as a way to setup Erg0, and don't find that avenue particularly interesting. I do think Erg0 is probably town if ChaosOmega is mafia; I think he's been acting generally town all game and the vote on ChaosOmega doesn't hurt. Same for Incognito, who sounded particularly genuine to me yesterday. I'm not sure how much to analyse the scummier people for possible buddies of ChaosOmega, which would be a total waste of time if ChaosOmega is actually a cop, or even an SK as has been suggested. I have to say when I read the opening flavour of the game I felt like it emphasised a town v mafia kind of game and there would be no SK, but after last night it definitely seems possible.

I too would like Adel to explain what she chose not to explain yesterday, and why she chose not to.
Jitsu wrote:If CO is mafia, then they have cut loose their damaged goods and distanced themselves from a fakeclaim, while looking town in the process.
I guess this is possible. I won't be giving any credit for being on his lynch if he turns out to be mafia though. The real information is from yesterday, especially with two innocent wagons going on.
Primpod 11:13 pm
chamber can you please come to ukmeet
i would love to finally touch your face
User avatar
Adel
Adel
Crystalline Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Adel
Crystalline Logick
Crystalline Logick
Posts: 6743
Joined: May 23, 2007
Location: Central Oregon / High Desert

Post Post #742 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 7:31 am

Post by Adel »

I'll explain later.

This is vollkan's first modded game on mafiascum.net.
User avatar
Patrick
Patrick
Rantbuddy
User avatar
User avatar
Patrick
Rantbuddy
Rantbuddy
Posts: 7475
Joined: May 3, 2006
Location: England

Post Post #743 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 7:39 am

Post by Patrick »

Adel wrote:I'll explain later.
How much later?
Primpod 11:13 pm
chamber can you please come to ukmeet
i would love to finally touch your face
User avatar
Adel
Adel
Crystalline Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Adel
Crystalline Logick
Crystalline Logick
Posts: 6743
Joined: May 23, 2007
Location: Central Oregon / High Desert

Post Post #744 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 7:43 am

Post by Adel »

When I am at home and have my notes in front of me. Off of the top of my head I can't remember what it was that I was supposed to explain today... I only know that I said it to wifom the scum into either killing me or not killing me last night. I won't say if it worked or not ;)
User avatar
Incognito
Incognito
Not Rex
User avatar
User avatar
Incognito
Not Rex
Not Rex
Posts: 5953
Joined: November 4, 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Post Post #745 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 7:51 am

Post by Incognito »

I have a few things to add here.

Oman, I still really, really,
really
dislike your play from Day 1. Aside from your question avoidance (btw, you
still
never answered my questions that I repeatedly copied over and over) there were other things about your play that struck me as scummy. You can give yourself a pat on the back for being the third vote on opie. I don't have an issue with this. But let's have a look at your vote:
Oman, February 8th, 2008 wrote:
Unvote Vote Opie
Adel has convinced me with a majority of her arguments (I feel some are incorrect, but confirmation bias explains those).

In conclusion: TrustGossip must stop posting. Opie must stop breathing.
You placed your vote on opie despite the fact that you conceded that Adel's case on opie wasn't water-tight. Then on February 25th after mentioning that you approve of the opie wagon, you made it a point to mention the following:
Oman wrote:I'm the first.

No lip from you or I won't "happy scumday" you tomorrow.
which is an interesting post to me. Yes, you became "the first" vote on opie because both Adel and Xylthixlm (the two people who voted for opie prior to you) had unvoted but the fact that you would even
mention
that seems odd. I'm trying really, really, really hard not to read this post as: "Yes, I know opie will come up as town but since I was the first vote, I obviously can't be scum. First voters aren't scum."

Then your actions following your vote got even weirder and more anti-town to me. There were plenty of other things that happened after you placed your vote on opie that you probably could have and
should have
talked about if you were town but you chose not to. All we got from you were statements like this:
Oman wrote:
Guardian wrote:Adel, how about Big Love mafia?
Eww. Please don't mention that game.
Oman wrote:Getting a strong town read off Adel.
Oman wrote:I approve of the Opie wagon.
Oman wrote:It could've been someone else, I didn't check.
which really don't amount to anything at all. In my opinion, if you were town, even if you felt like your vote on opie was completely warranted (which, by the way, I find it hard to believe since you even conceded that Adel's case wasn't water-tight) you probably should have commented on the other developments that were going on. In fact, you even promised that you would comment on these developments but instead you never did:
Oman wrote:
Erg0 wrote:Xyl and ChaosOmega have already been allowed to get away with majorly wagonny votes on opie
I will review these.
And by the time the deadline drew to a close, it was too late.

So now my questions:

1) Can you please review these "wagonny votes" mentioned previously by Erg0 and provide your thoughts about them?

2) Can you please finally respond to my question that I only asked what three or four times in the thread?

3) Can you please explain why you agreed with a case that wasn't water-tight and why you didn't feel the need to comment on everything else that was going on in the thread throughout Day 1?

More later~
User avatar
Erg0
Erg0
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Erg0
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4157
Joined: February 25, 2007
Location: Secret Aussie.

Post Post #746 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 9:43 am

Post by Erg0 »

Incognito wrote:
Erg0 wrote:Me neither (obviously), but I thought it was interesting that both of the players that I opposed lynching yesterday are now dead. Obviously opie was a communal decision, but I doubt that it was a coincidence that Guardian was killed last night (unless he was giving off power role tells that I missed).
I don't understand why you feel this way, Erg0. It's not like you were the only one who was opposed to lynching Guardian yesterday. Why do you feel like this night-kill of Guardian was somehow used to set you and only you up?
I'm being egocentric again, ignore me if you'd prefer.

I don't particularly want to rush the CO lynch, but there's a limit to what we can achieve today whilst talking around the elephant in room. Those with something relevant to say should say it, but everything turned out pretty much how I expected yesterday so I don't have much more to add right now. My opinions at the end of yesterday are basically unchanged.
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
User avatar
Oman
Oman
NK Immune Miller Vig
User avatar
User avatar
Oman
NK Immune Miller Vig
NK Immune Miller Vig
Posts: 7014
Joined: June 19, 2007

Post Post #747 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:55 am

Post by Oman »

Erg0 wrote:Me neither (obviously), but I thought it was interesting that both of the players that I opposed lynching yesterday are now dead. Obviously opie was a communal decision, but I doubt that it was a coincidence that Guardian was killed last night (unless he was giving off power role tells that I missed).


NO! You say "me neither...BUT!!!" Do you or don't you?
Jitsu wrote:I say we put ChaosOmega on the back burner for the moment and revisit him later today.
I agree entirely.
Incognito wrote:You placed your vote on opie despite the fact that you conceded that Adel's case on opie wasn't water-tight.
No case is ever water tight. As town, we do the best we can. Overall, it was the best we had.
Incognito wrote:Yes, you became "the first" vote on opie because both Adel and Xylthixlm (the two people who voted for opie prior to you) had unvoted but the fact that you would even mention that seems odd.
I was looking at the votecount at the time. I meant first as in L-5. The "first" vote. Kind of like the third vote, no matter what actually number it is, if there are two people on before you, its the third vote.
Incog wrote:if you were town, even if you felt like your vote on opie was completely warranted you probably should have commented on the other developments that were going on.
I can't believe you thought you'd get away with that. You didn't quote my erg0 situation or anything, you just quoted my 1 liners.
Incog wrote:1) Can you please review these "wagonny votes" mentioned previously by Erg0 and provide your thoughts about them?

2) Can you please finally respond to my question that I only asked what three or four times in the thread?

3) Can you please explain why you agreed with a case that wasn't water-tight and why you didn't feel the need to comment on everything else that was going on in the thread throughout Day 1?
1) Can you please review these "wagonny votes" mentioned previously by Erg0 and provide your thoughts about them?

2) Can you please finally respond to my question that I only asked what three or four times in the thread?

3) Can you please explain why you agreed with a case that wasn't water-tight and why you didn't feel the need to comment on everything else that was going on in the thread throughout Day 1?
I'll do this later.
Patrick wrote:does anyone know whether vollkan is a bastard mod type of guy?
I know him to be a bastard :P <3 Samuel!

Unvote


I intend to vote CO again, but later.
It's unfortunate that good oral sex excuses bad chemistry. - Korts
User avatar
Erg0
Erg0
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Erg0
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4157
Joined: February 25, 2007
Location: Secret Aussie.

Post Post #748 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:28 am

Post by Erg0 »

Oman wrote:I don't look at nightkills for scumtells. Its too easier to WIFOM.
Oman wrote:
Erg0 wrote:Me neither (obviously), but I thought it was interesting that both of the players that I opposed lynching yesterday are now dead. Obviously opie was a communal decision, but I doubt that it was a coincidence that Guardian was killed last night (unless he was giving off power role tells that I missed).


NO! You say "me neither...BUT!!!" Do you or don't you?
The "but" was in reference to your original statement about looking for scumtells. I agree that looking for scumtells in nightkills is usually futile (certainly in the early game), but I wasn't really talking about scumtells, just making a general observation on possible motivations for the Guardian kill. I don't think that this really leads back to anyone in particular.
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
User avatar
Matt_S
Matt_S
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Matt_S
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1303
Joined: January 17, 2008
Location: Merriam, Kansas

Post Post #749 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:00 pm

Post by Matt_S »

Player by player mini-analysis after a quick reread of most of the stuff.

Adel
I never really understood why Adel was so sure that opie was scum, and so early on. However, I'll wait for Adel to give the promised explanation.

Oman
Not the nicest player, but he did state suspicions on more than one person. I'd say overall Oman's been useful and protown.

Erg0
It's probably because I was so opposed to the first wagon on him, but I've thought of Erg0 as being protown, and it seems to fit. He contributes to the discussion a lot.

ChaosOmega
If tracker and watcher mean what I think they do, then a cop doesn't seem likely. Especially an insane or paranoid cop. Hasn't contributed much.

Xylthixlm
Also isn't the nicest player. While there were things he did I disapprove of, he did ask a lot of questions of players and their suspicions. Xylthixlm could go either way.

Incognito
Seemed to be very influential day 1. I can't recall him doing anything scummy on day 1. However, today Incognito did seem to either miss or ignore how Oman had named Erg0 suspicious quite often, as well as me. I'll have to see his reply to this though.

Patrick/TrustGossip
TrustGossip looked to be helpful and fairly active. Patrick is definitely helpful and active. I can't think of anything else to say.

Jitsu
The main thing people brought up against him was that he backtracked. I've never looked at that negatively like everyone else did, but I guess I can see why they would find it suspicious. However, Jitsu is another person who asks questions, which I like.

Btw, I'm guessing that knife stabbing isn't likely to be a vig kill?
Show
"So I went to the librarian in the biology section and asked her if she could find me a map of the cat." -Richard Feynman

The Feynman Problem-Solving Algorithm:
(1) write down the problem;
(2) think very hard;
(3) write down the answer.

Return to “Completed Mini Normal Games”