Mini #556 - The Most Excellent People Ever - Called.


User avatar
Cavebear with a toothache
Cavebear with a toothache
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Cavebear with a toothache
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: January 11, 2008
Location: Far away in space

Post Post #300 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 5:12 am

Post by Cavebear with a toothache »

Thanatos: Way to distract the town and then disappear for a week. >_>

Tyhess hasn't posted for more than two weeks. That's some heavy duty lurking right there...
Mod: Prod tyhess, please.
User avatar
Rosso Carne
Rosso Carne
[]=====
User avatar
User avatar
Rosso Carne
[]=====
[]=====
Posts: 2182
Joined: April 22, 2006
Location: The Socialist State of America

Post Post #301 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 5:16 am

Post by Rosso Carne »

THE OFFICIAL "FUCK YOU CAVEBEAR FOR TAKING MY TOIP OF PAGE VOTECOUNT!!!" VOTECOUNT!


PITT IS IT!


{1}
The Jester
(Korlash)

{1}
Korlash
(RangeroftheNorth)

{1}
Guardian
(Thanatos)

{1}
RangeroftheNorth
(tyhess)

{5}
Lloyd
(UltimaAvalon, Panzerjager, The Jester, lovo14, WhoMe?)

{1}
Panzerjager
(Lloyd)

{1}
tyhess
(Guardian)



Not Voting(Cavebear with a toothache)
With 12 alive, it's 7 to lynch


i'M PUTTING A PROD ON TYHESS NOW!
[13:31] glorktheinvader: and I was rocking this one guy
User avatar
Korlash
Korlash
Krap Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Korlash
Krap Logick
Krap Logick
Posts: 6579
Joined: August 23, 2007
Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous

Post Post #302 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 5:21 am

Post by Korlash »

Jester wrote: "FoS: Than For using reasons that well don't hold water. Kira? Really? Does anyone think we'd have a Jester? I think Than might be Jester, because if he means Kira from Deathnote....He's retarded. "
What? Come again? I'm sorry... what? required a double take...

How does claiming Kira = retarded? (Fake caliming excluded as that is retarded, claim itself is not) And why is he automatically considered to be a jester?

Panzer, can we compare our "caught" scum in terms of best lynch material. All I'm seeing recently on Lloyd is his scummy vote. I still don't see why Than/Jester isn't the lynch candidate so it's hard for me to switch over. And with Guardian all Thys crazy the vote pool is getting very shallow.

I'll go first.

So Than makes a claiming joke, no bad intentions or what not, just trying to connect with his partners. He gets into a bit of hot water for it, and then lashes out becuase his partner did not help him the way he hoped. Jester does his whole "well okay, than ignore my above post on Than." Than sees good attempt to bus, so he goes for it. Jester, seriously this guy is known for his overly bussing on other sites, attacks back. Than later does the whole "Although, if Jester did bring it up, which I mustive missed, then I retreat my claim on Jester's actions. " So far we have a fairly "directed" antagonistic fight. (Than's joke was directed at Jester, not implying night communication here or anything) Each person has said "Oh well then forget what I said" in some way, shape, or post. Than is scummy for the stupid claim, and Jester is just plain scum.

Granted this is all speculation, kinda forced a bit, lots of room for strawmanning I know... And I hate judging another's affiliation... All the more reason I want jester lynched.

Ok your turn... what makes lloyd a better lynch, and why should I switch my vote?

Also Than has been "lurkish" in every game I am in with him, often gone for a week+ at times.
It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.

Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!
User avatar
Thanatos
Thanatos
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Thanatos
Goon
Goon
Posts: 510
Joined: November 7, 2007

Post Post #303 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:16 pm

Post by Thanatos »

Yeah, I'm sorry, Korlash. I've been in a rough real life patch, for a while. Once upon I time I was very active, and I feel bad about it.

Other than that, though, I agree with everything in your post, Korlash. Even that my claim was scummy. It was a stupid attempt at a joke, and I messed up. I honestly don't know what I was thinking.

Still, what bugs me is people reading so much into it as to actually make more of it than it really is. It's a conversation piece at best, and a distraction at worse. To actually make a tell out of a joke is silly.
Never forget...you are Mortal.
User avatar
Thanatos
Thanatos
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Thanatos
Goon
Goon
Posts: 510
Joined: November 7, 2007

Post Post #304 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:17 pm

Post by Thanatos »

Cavebear with a toothache wrote:Thanatos: Way to distract the town and then disappear for a week. >_>

Tyhess hasn't posted for more than two weeks. That's some heavy duty lurking right there...
Mod: Prod tyhess, please.
It's called vacation. I was in NYC with no internet.
Never forget...you are Mortal.
User avatar
Guardian
Guardian
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Guardian
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4703
Joined: March 28, 2007
Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.

Post Post #305 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 3:05 pm

Post by Guardian »

Thanatos wrote:Still, what bugs me is people reading so much into it as to actually make more of it than it really is. It's a conversation piece at best, and a distraction at worse. To actually make a tell out of a joke is silly.
This sets off about 100 alarm bells in my head. There's a user on this site named EmpTyger -- his user title "It's a JOKE" is from when he got caught as scum for making a joke. Jokes can definitely be scummy.

Thanatos has been lurking about as bad as tyhess, even counting his two vacations. Why does he have us talking about avatars? Why is having an avatar a reasonable indicator of anything? I select avatars based on google picture searches for terms like "cool guy", the avatar I end up getting might be something I know nothing about.

Lovo isn't making much sense. Scum?

unvote: tyhess


vote: Thanatos

FOS: Lovo


unFos: Panzer
reasonable play lately, and someone pointed out his vote changes made sense... and they did, to an extent.

Lloyd has quieted down now that people are getting more suspicious of him... Odd.
Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]
User avatar
PJ.
PJ.
Hell in a Cell
User avatar
User avatar
PJ.
Hell in a Cell
Hell in a Cell
Posts: 4601
Joined: January 5, 2007
Location: somewhere better than you =*

Post Post #306 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 3:48 pm

Post by PJ. »

Panzerjager wrote: PBPA time.

1: Random vote on Lovo.
2: Disagreeing with Lovo.
3. Asking if his UA's elipses were code after he said they were elipses
4. Saying you missed is explanation after you were scolded
5. Repeats what everyone else has been saying abot Urza and RotN vote on RotN, no FoS on Urza
6. "Hey guys I'm bandwagoning RotN and you all should ignore thanatos claim"
7. Gives Urza's replacement an excuse for not being able to speak on the subject pretty much negating most of day 1's discussion. Seems like some scum would do to protect his buddy.
8-9. Nothing
10. Attacks Lovo for saying longer day 1's are good, Agreeing with Urza.
11. Defeats by breadcrumb reasoning aka strawman's my arguement.
12. Scolds jester for his No lynch but it's just a slap on the wrist, smells like distancing
13. Defends Urza again from Cavebear's thought of stronger personalities directing lynchs. Llyod pretty much says that strong personalties are gonna dictate games regardless.
14. typos making his post almost unreadable. pretty much saying that stown can slip just as easily as scum.
15. Big table and votes me for hoping (already addressed this
16. typos are awesome.

It seems like he has been buddying up to Urza and distancing to Jester and Lovo. He also lurked all throughout the Urza and Korlash situation and only making comments on it once the situation completely diffuses. Seems to want to avoid attention and is really protective of Urza. Also tried to half as distance from Urza in order to later say he doesn't buddy up to him. I honestly think Llyod is scum and is today's best lynch. All this is in addition to a strong gut feeling.
Llyod is clearly scum and nothing sense the PBPA has helped him any. I think Lovo is scum as well.
Sometimes a sandwich is just a sandwich.
User avatar
Thanatos
Thanatos
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Thanatos
Goon
Goon
Posts: 510
Joined: November 7, 2007

Post Post #307 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 8:35 pm

Post by Thanatos »

Guardian wrote:
Thanatos wrote:Still, what bugs me is people reading so much into it as to actually make more of it than it really is. It's a conversation piece at best, and a distraction at worse. To actually make a tell out of a joke is silly.
This sets off about 100 alarm bells in my head. There's a user on this site named EmpTyger -- his user title "It's a JOKE" is from when he got caught as scum for making a joke. Jokes can definitely be scummy.

Thanatos has been lurking about as bad as tyhess, even counting his two vacations. Why does he have us talking about avatars? Why is having an avatar a reasonable indicator of anything? I select avatars based on google picture searches for terms like "cool guy", the avatar I end up getting might be something I know nothing about.

Lovo isn't making much sense. Scum?

unvote: tyhess


vote: Thanatos

FOS: Lovo


unFos: Panzer
reasonable play lately, and someone pointed out his vote changes made sense... and they did, to an extent.

Lloyd has quieted down now that people are getting more suspicious of him... Odd.
Jokes can be scummy? Interesting. Can you go into detail about how, exactly, he was outed by a joke?
Never forget...you are Mortal.
User avatar
Guardian
Guardian
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Guardian
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4703
Joined: March 28, 2007
Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.

Post Post #308 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 8:49 pm

Post by Guardian »

He made a joking role claim, actually.

His was significantly different in that he jokingly claimed to be scum -- but I know many players (myself included) who find that scum are more likely to joke than townies. Develop comraderie with the townies, sense of trust, also relax some nervous tension.

While you didn't quite go so far as to joke claim scum, you did jokingly claim. And the same principle is kind of in action here -- why joke about your role? What's "funny" about it? etc.
Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]
User avatar
PJ.
PJ.
Hell in a Cell
User avatar
User avatar
PJ.
Hell in a Cell
Hell in a Cell
Posts: 4601
Joined: January 5, 2007
Location: somewhere better than you =*

Post Post #309 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:05 pm

Post by PJ. »

And on top of that, you did reference a role that, to my knowledge through Jesters reaction, would have been scum, so Than quite technical did joke claim scum.
Sometimes a sandwich is just a sandwich.
User avatar
lovo14
lovo14
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
lovo14
Goon
Goon
Posts: 102
Joined: January 22, 2008
Location: conquerclub.com

Post Post #310 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:38 pm

Post by lovo14 »

UltimaAvalon wrote:
lovo wrote:i have been lynched even after claiming
Lesson #1 Claiming isnt a "Get Out of Lynch Free" card. If people don't believe the claim, and/or you're pretty damn scummy, you're still gonna be lynched.

Lesson #2 No more talking about ongoing games

Lesson #3 Lynch Lloyd
meh it hurted town so they fucked up

my vote is on llyod :roll:


@guardian how am i not making sense
"Dave Grohl is everywhere, he is even in our breakfast cereals" --Oscar Whilde
User avatar
Thanatos
Thanatos
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Thanatos
Goon
Goon
Posts: 510
Joined: November 7, 2007

Post Post #311 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:39 pm

Post by Thanatos »

Seriously, Panzer? Kira would be scum, but he also wouldn't be in this game's flavor, so you're really splitting hairs. I was making a joke about Jesters avatar, and a recognition that I knew where his avatar was from. Judge me by my actions, not an off-handed comment. I don't really care if I look more suspicious for it. I know, in hindsight, that it was stupid, so I deserve that much punishment at least, but to base a vote on it? Because it worked once before? That's downright silly.

I can't defend myself with anything other than what I've been saying. "It's a joke." That's all there is to say. Could we stop distracting everyone from what else is going on (mainly you, panzer V. Lloyd) with a fruitless conversation, or do you have something new to add to this?
Never forget...you are Mortal.
User avatar
lovo14
lovo14
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
lovo14
Goon
Goon
Posts: 102
Joined: January 22, 2008
Location: conquerclub.com

Post Post #312 (ISO) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:41 pm

Post by lovo14 »

sorry for double post but to add
about lloyds PBPA
10.Attacks Lovo for saying longer day 1's are good, Agreeing with Urza.

only scum want a quick day/lynch
"Dave Grohl is everywhere, he is even in our breakfast cereals" --Oscar Whilde
Lloyd
Lloyd
Vote Lloyd
Lloyd
Vote Lloyd
Vote Lloyd
Posts: 1065
Joined: December 17, 2005

Post Post #313 (ISO) » Wed Mar 05, 2008 12:36 am

Post by Lloyd »

Comments on my bandwagon.

- UltimaAvalon: No surprise that he initiated the vote on me. He wants to kill everyone...If he had the choice, half of our town would be dead already. Only if Rosso Carne had given UltimaAvalon a day kill to use . . .

- Panzerjager: Vote-hopper who rationalizes based on directions of the wind. He's not vote-hopping anymore because I pointed it out.

- The Jester: I think Thanatos'claim was to get the discussion going, and nothing more, and I still feel the same way.

- lovo14: "only scum want a quick day/lynch"

Like Urzassedatives and RangeroftheNorth, I prefer shorter day 1s, which says little about alignment.

Since Guardian replaced Urzassedatives...If Guardian prefers longer day 1, would that suddenly change his role's alignment?

- WhoMe?: "Going for someone because they have the fastest wagon?" You're pulling straws out of thin air. His wagon was slow . . .
User avatar
Korlash
Korlash
Krap Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Korlash
Krap Logick
Krap Logick
Posts: 6579
Joined: August 23, 2007
Location: The Constellation of Kasterborous

Post Post #314 (ISO) » Wed Mar 05, 2008 1:07 am

Post by Korlash »

Panzer wrote:And on top of that, you did reference a role that, to my knowledge through Jesters reaction, would have been scum, so Than quite technical did joke claim scum.
Kira would not be scum. Unless you can argue Kira is a jerk/dickhead/loser... This is Excellent people, not "Nice peopel" not "The good guys!" not "Love and peace parade!" Scum would fall more along the lines or Michael Jackson... Pres Bush... The Boss from Office Space...

That in mind Than is still highly suspect and I in no way think he is Kira.
It's not my job to be right, it's my job to be convincing.

Star Trek Voyager Mafia! Ends in a Starfleet victory! Pomp, Circumstance, and Bloodwine for all!
User avatar
Thanatos
Thanatos
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Thanatos
Goon
Goon
Posts: 510
Joined: November 7, 2007

Post Post #315 (ISO) » Wed Mar 05, 2008 7:49 am

Post by Thanatos »

Korlash: and you shouldn't, and I'm not.
Never forget...you are Mortal.
User avatar
PJ.
PJ.
Hell in a Cell
User avatar
User avatar
PJ.
Hell in a Cell
Hell in a Cell
Posts: 4601
Joined: January 5, 2007
Location: somewhere better than you =*

Post Post #316 (ISO) » Wed Mar 05, 2008 8:37 am

Post by PJ. »

Oy, I got the vibe from jestert that Kira would be scum. Anyway, what I meant was to add to guardians arguement but it doesn't really matter I'm still lynching scum(Llyod).

And Llyod you pointing out my vote hopping has little do with me stopped changing my vote. Your scum, thats why my vote has stayed.
Sometimes a sandwich is just a sandwich.
User avatar
Guardian
Guardian
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Guardian
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4703
Joined: March 28, 2007
Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.

Post Post #317 (ISO) » Wed Mar 05, 2008 8:42 am

Post by Guardian »

Lloyd wrote:Since Guardian replaced Urzassedatives...If Guardian prefers longer day 1, would that suddenly change his role's alignment?
What do you mean here, I don't understand you.

lloyd, any reaction to my entrance post where I accused you?

lovo -- I read your posts, and I often don't understand your positions or reasons for them. that is what I mean by you not making sense.

why do scum only want a quick day 1, lovo?
Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]
Lloyd
Lloyd
Vote Lloyd
Lloyd
Vote Lloyd
Vote Lloyd
Posts: 1065
Joined: December 17, 2005

Post Post #318 (ISO) » Wed Mar 05, 2008 8:34 pm

Post by Lloyd »

Guardian,

Regarding you replacing Urzassedatives, I was pointing out that lovo's meta-gaming argument about short / long days is invalid when someone is replaced.

I don't view your post about words are scummy as an accusation. If something I wrote seems confusing, ask me and I'll clarify.
User avatar
PJ.
PJ.
Hell in a Cell
User avatar
User avatar
PJ.
Hell in a Cell
Hell in a Cell
Posts: 4601
Joined: January 5, 2007
Location: somewhere better than you =*

Post Post #319 (ISO) » Wed Mar 05, 2008 11:49 pm

Post by PJ. »

Urza/Guardian very well could be your partner, and no that doesn't change his alignment..or yours.
Sometimes a sandwich is just a sandwich.
Lloyd
Lloyd
Vote Lloyd
Lloyd
Vote Lloyd
Vote Lloyd
Posts: 1065
Joined: December 17, 2005

Post Post #320 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:54 am

Post by Lloyd »

Panzerjager wrote:It seems like he has been buddying up to Urza and distancing to Jester and Lovo.
Panzerjager wrote:
Panzerjager wrote:It seems like he has been buddying up to Urza and distancing to Jester and Lovo.
Llyod is clearly scum and nothing sense the PBPA has helped him any. I think Lovo is scum as well.
Panzerjager wrote:Urza/Guardian very well could be your partner, and no that doesn't change his alignment..or yours.
- Your repetition isn't validating your accusations. Considering that your posts are becoming old news, everyone may tune you out soon

- Your logic isn't making any sense, and instead vote-hopping (since I called you out on it), you are now making accusations by associations

On one hand, you accuse Urzassedatives / Guardian and I because we supposedly buddied up in your eyes.

On the other hand, you accuse lovo14 and I because we supposedly distanced in your eyes.

If you want to accuse people by hypothetical associations, at least make up your mind in how you associate one way or another.

- Wishy-washy associations that you're making seem like an extension of your earlier wishy-washy voting.

When this game is over many months from now, I may nominate you for the title of wishy-washy. I'll have to take a look whether you play other games in a similar fashion.
User avatar
lovo14
lovo14
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
lovo14
Goon
Goon
Posts: 102
Joined: January 22, 2008
Location: conquerclub.com

Post Post #321 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:10 am

Post by lovo14 »

Guardian wrote: why do scum only want a quick day 1, lovo?
in general (yes its a generalisation) that scum want a quick day 1 so that town can learn as lil as possible and then scum get into killing asap
"Dave Grohl is everywhere, he is even in our breakfast cereals" --Oscar Whilde
User avatar
Thanatos
Thanatos
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Thanatos
Goon
Goon
Posts: 510
Joined: November 7, 2007

Post Post #322 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:48 pm

Post by Thanatos »

Frankly, Panzer, doing nothing but repetition seems really scummy, and a way of appearing to be doing something, while really it just ends up blending in and, at best, is tunnel vision. You've made a few decent content posts, but mostly it's just restating your hunches. Or am I wrong?
Never forget...you are Mortal.
User avatar
Guardian
Guardian
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Guardian
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4703
Joined: March 28, 2007
Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.

Post Post #323 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2008 1:10 pm

Post by Guardian »

Wow, the more I re-read this thread, the more I find more and more scummy behavior that is just being ignored.

unvote vote: Cavebear with a toothache


Cavebear seems to have paid attention only to the major wagons in this game, hopping from one to the other, being somewhat cautious, calling out others for lurking, and other than calling out lurkers having very little original thought.

Speaking of being tentative and cautions -- Cavebear is the only one not voting.

Cavebear, who do you find suspicious right now, and why?

Is the third time a charm? Possibly.
Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]
User avatar
Cavebear with a toothache
Cavebear with a toothache
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Cavebear with a toothache
Goon
Goon
Posts: 464
Joined: January 11, 2008
Location: Far away in space

Post Post #324 (ISO) » Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:01 pm

Post by Cavebear with a toothache »

The reason I'm not voting is because I'm still confused by the game. Too much joking, not enough sharing reasons for suspicions. I would've voted Tyhess, but I thought a prod would be more useful in this situation. Voting lurkers does nothing if they don't even see it. That being said, I do find lots of people more or less suspicious. In alphabetical order:

Guardian: Went after Tyhess for lurking, abandoned him for another lurker (Thanatos; Guardian's words not mine) for no apparent reason, and is now after me for being after lurkers (among other things).

RangeroftheNorth: Was willing to have a quick lynch and didn't respond to why, returned briefly before he conveniently disappearing again after promising to add something meaningful. That was two weeks ago.

Thanatos: Made an odd claim, disappeared for two weeks and explained it away with having been on holiday for a week (note discrepancy). Hasn't added anything to the discussion since he got back.

The Jester: A joker. Seemed willing to do a quick lynch at first, seems less suspicious of late.

Tyhess: A lurker.

UA: A bigger joker. If he's got reasons for doing anything, he's not sharing them. Doesn't make him scummy as such, but adds to the confusion which I don't regard as pro-town playing. Is it so much to ask that you post things that aren't just distracting?



Regarding Lloyd: The person with the biggest wagon right now. Maybe this is my inexperience showing, but I don't see the big thing he's done wrong. The biggest thing on him seems to be that he thought Thanatos claimed to start discussion. Panzerjager seems to base a lot of his reasoning on a gut feeling (and ignored my plea to lay out his case) and Guardian's reasoning that "words are scummy"... No, I honestly don't understand what you mean. Would you care to clarify?

In short, I'm not at all sure who deserves lynching today. You've got a point though, I should use my vote.

Vote: Thanatos

If you want to get away from the Kira claim, post something of value to make us think it's less interesting. If you want people to post more content, lead by example.

Return to “Completed Mini Theme Games”