Prophecy Mafia - Over

UltimaAvalon · Post Post #1150 (ISO) » Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:33 am

I still want a Gorrad death

Vote: Gorrad

Iammars · Post Post #1151 (ISO) » Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:26 pm

Skruffs wrote:So let me get this straight... the VIG has killed the jailkeeper AND the super backup...

Uh... Unless I'm reading the kill methods wrong, didn't the mafia kill the jialkeeper and the super backup? The vig only killed the cop.

Skruffs · Post Post #1152 (ISO) » Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:54 pm

Ahh. Got their kill methods switched up.

Oman is still scum.

Lowell · Post Post #1153 (ISO) » Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:38 am

vote gorrad

. I dont' know what's happening. But he seems potentially scumful. Plus bandwagon.

Gorrad · Post Post #1154 (ISO) » Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:33 am

FoS: Lowell

. That's a terrible post to make this late in the game. It might be ok d1, but d4 it's just scummy. MoS's posts are worse, but you're on THE LIST, bub.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #1155 (ISO) » Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:55 am

vote lowell

Lowell · Post Post #1156 (ISO) » Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:05 am

There are still 13 people left. Chill out.

To review: you are upset that I've ignored the three days of analysis when I cast my vote. Your solution: ignore three days of analysis to cast your vote on me. Good plan.

Iammars · Post Post #1157 (ISO) » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:18 pm

Lowell wrote:There are still 13 people left. Chill out.

To review: you are upset that I've ignored the three days of analysis when I cast my vote. Your solution: ignore three days of analysis to cast your vote on me. Good plan.

FOS: Lowell

If you do something scummy, you deserve at least some suspicion unless you're a confirmed townie.

Oman · Post Post #1158 (ISO) » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:23 pm

Nope, I'm on

This

bandwagon

Vote Lowell

.

Ironic aint it?

Oh and skruffs, your case is overpowering me, I cannot defend myself.

Skruffs · Post Post #1159 (ISO) » Thu Feb 21, 2008 2:06 pm

Scum rarely can, against my irreefutabe logic.

Seriously, though, starting off the day trolling for power roles?

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #1160 (ISO) » Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:19 pm

calm down lowell

Skruffs · Post Post #1161 (ISO) » Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:06 pm

Gorrad - Question:
Are you saying that you are not scumful?

Gorrad · Post Post #1162 (ISO) » Thu Feb 21, 2008 6:08 pm

Skruffs wrote:Gorrad - Question:
Are you saying that you are not scumful?

Nope, I'm definitely a bit scummy. I'll be the first to admit I have far from given this game my all. Lowell just made a bad post, and I'm calling him on it.

Oman · Post Post #1163 (ISO) » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:00 pm

Scruffs wrote:Seriously, though, starting off the day trolling for power roles?

I did?

Bookitty · Post Post #1164 (ISO) » Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:11 am

Think he's referring to this, Oman.

Oman wrote:So thats all the powerroles gone isn't it.

Skruffs · Post Post #1165 (ISO) » Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:09 am

Yuppo.

Your lack of response confirms your guilt.

Now die.

Skruffs · Post Post #1166 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:00 pm

Come on.
Just one mafia player, give up. You'll be losing for yourself, but helping make the game great again, and that's the only way your buddies can win, if they actually win the game.

Bookitty · Post Post #1167 (ISO) » Fri Feb 29, 2008 2:19 am

I want Oman to explain his earlier remark.

Lowell · Post Post #1168 (ISO) » Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:27 am

Bookitty wrote:I want Oman to explain his earlier remark.

I do too, actually.

Gorrad · Post Post #1169 (ISO) » Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:12 am

MoS and Lowell, thoughts on each other please.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #1170 (ISO) » Sun Mar 02, 2008 4:20 am

(yawn)

Oman · Post Post #1171 (ISO) » Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:55 pm

I was saying that we've lost all our powerroles. Its an Open Setup anyone could have answered.

Skruffs · Post Post #1172 (ISO) » Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:13 am

Except we haven't. You could have answered that yourself. Were you trying to fish out the vig to respond to you?
I think so.

Oman · Post Post #1173 (ISO) » Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:50 am

No, I wasn't. I was looking for anyone to respond to it.

I didn't bother to look at the first page. "Never suggest malice when sheer laziness will suffice"

Iammars · Post Post #1174 (ISO) » Wed Mar 05, 2008 3:01 pm

Oman wrote:No, I wasn't. I was looking for anyone to respond to it.

I didn't bother to look at the first page. "Never suggest malice when sheer laziness will suffice"

Despite the fact that this doesn't rhyme, I hate the idea of necessarily letting people hide behind the excuse of laziness.